Crunchy Con

Liveblogging Barack Obama's speech

Thursday August 28, 2008

Categories: Democrats

OK, here we go...

I was skeptical about the stadium setting. I was wrong. This looks fantastic for Obama. And the roar of an entire stadium full of people, and these incredible shots. Wow.

(BTW, here's the text of the speech he just started to give.)

UPDATE: "America, we are better than these last eight years. We are a better country than this." That's a good approach to take. Better angels of our nature and all that.

UPDATE.2: I appreciate Obama's standing up for the autoworkers, but the truth is what John McCain told them: their jobs are not coming back. Barack Obama won't say this. John McCain did. Sorry, but there it is. How does Obama propose to save the autoworker jobs, especially given that he's a Clinton-style free-trade Democrat? He needs to be asked this over the next few weeks.

UPDATE.3: "It's time for them to own their failure." Pow!

UPDATE.4: This speech is loping along nicely. But it's not soaring. Or even close to soaring. Yet, anyway.

UPDATE.5 "And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East."

What a load of nonsense. Within 10 years? He knows this is impossible. Why does he say it? Why do people cheer this? Do they really think he can do this? That any politician could? This irritates me to no end. It's just talk.

"I'll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. And in exchange, I'll ask for higher standards and more accountability."

Isn't education a state and local responsibility? "Higher standards and more accountability"? G.W. Bush said the same thing; we got No Child Left Behind. Does Obama support continuing that? Why or why not? What's his plan for accountability. He should be asked this over the next few weeks.

UPDATE.6: "John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell - but he won't even follow him to the cave where he lives."

What does this mean? That Obama would invade Pakistan? Either this is empty bluster, or it's reckless. But he said it in August 2007 too.

"The challenges we face require tough choices, and Democrats as well as Republicans will need to cast off the worn-out ideas and politics of the past."

By now, this is sounding like the dreariest boilerplate. He has offered ideas in this speech, and in his campaign, but what exactly is so new about any of this? Seriously, what's new? I can understand Democrats liking this kind of thing, but come on, it's not new. What's new is the face of the Democratic politician. Seriously, here's John Kerry's 2004 convention acceptance speech. What's essentially different about Obama's speech and this one? Kerry talks a lot more about the war and the military than Obama does, and talks more sensibly about foreign wars and entanglements than Obama has tonight. But it's the same basic speech, on policy. Or so it seems to me.

"And you know what - it's worked before. Because it feeds into the cynicism we all have about government. When Washington doesn't work, all its promises seem empty. If your hopes have been dashed again and again, then it's best to stop hoping, and settle for what you already know."

No, you know what makes people cynical about government? When politicians promise things like ending dependence on foreign oil within 10 years, and don't deliver because they can't deliver. This is all about packaging. Obama's an attractive package. But again, where are the new ideas? Where are the "new politics for a new time"? Call me cynical, but this is bosh.

UPDATE.7: Speech is over. Given what he's capable of, and what he needed to do tonight, I think this speech was a slight disappointment. A B-minus. He said earlier today that it would be "workmanlike," I believe. Well, he was right. Hillary's speech was better, I'm astonished to say.

But what a lovely family, these Obamas. FWIW. And again, the stadium setting is really, really working for him. The speech wasn't worthy of the setting, I'm afraid.

UPDATE.8: On Fox, Juan Williams is bringing it to Obama pretty hard, saying that his speech wasn't memorable, not especially substantive, and that Obama didn't play to the real emotion in the crowds. The moment is memorable, Williams said, but not because of anything Obama said. Bill Kristol, in contrast, is saying Obama did a great job.

Advertisement
Comments
Anonymous
August 29, 2008 10:58 AM

Lord Karth, what made Lincoln qualified? State senator and single term in the House of Representatives, he was.

Lincoln had served only one term in the House. He used that one term to be one of the more forceful critics of the hugely popular Mexican War.

But Lincoln more importantly established himself long before running for President as the leading national spokesman for the Anti-Slavery cause, which was THE issue of the day. Lincoln was viewed by many as an extremist, but his positions were specific and articulated courageously.

In other words, Abraham Lincoln didn't waste his rhetoric on banalities like Hope and Change.

Alicia
August 29, 2008 1:01 PM

sigaliris, you are so right. Obama is telegenic, smooth, and more or less a "metrosexual" so he gets treated as an empty-headed celebrity (or given a nickname such as that bestowed on Bill Clinton, "Slick Willie."

Biden is direct and down-to-earth, so he's called a big-mouth. Once people make up their minds, no facts or new information is enough to change them.

elmo
August 29, 2008 2:14 PM

Elmo- " Why don't you call him a retard while you're at it, Rod?"

Hey Sis2Lis: Sorry if I offended you. I thought that Rod was out of line calling somebody autist/asberger's in a demeaning and insulting way, and was trying to point out that this is no better than calling somebody a "retard".

Anna
August 31, 2008 7:27 PM

Wow, do we really believe what he says. In that speech it had no substance no real solutions. Just the same bashing of McCain. I needed to hear a solutions. I would feel more comfortable if Biden were running for President. I look at Obama and say "How can anyone believe in this guy?" He has no executive experience, no foreign policy experience. I question his character, especially his character. Being associated with people, dirty people does not make him a favorable candidate. I'm sorry he is very green and so I place my vote to Mr. McCain.

Your Name
January 20, 2009 7:29 PM

I think the thousands of people in the audience who were crying were inspired, no matter how much you try to act like you didn't hear it.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.