Crunchy Con

McCain picks a vice president

Thursday August 28, 2008

Categories: Republicans

Word is that McCain's settled on a vice president; the name will reportedly be released late tonight, after Obama's speech. Who should it be? I confess I haven't a clue. I know it should not be Joe Lieberman, whose name has been floated in recent days. A Lieberman pick would be a disaster. Aside from Iraq policy, Lieberman's a doctrinaire liberal Democrat; if McCain dropped dead (hey, he's old and has had cancer), the president would be a politician almost as liberal as Barack Obama. That would be impossible for Republicans to swallow.

What about Tim Pawlenty? I take it for granted that Pawlenty's a good man and an effective governor, but nobody knows him. It's an underwhelming pick, especially compared to Biden, who will bigfoot him in the debates. I doubt Pawlenty would do harm, but would he help? Doubt it.

Same with Romney. Is anybody excited about a Romney pick? Really? Romney's certainly capable of stepping into the chief executive's chair, and I think simply because he's so well known and capable of holding a national stage, he'd be a stronger pick than Pawlenty. But a very safe pick.

Last night on cable, they were talking about Meg Whitman, the eBay CEO, as a possible pick. That would be bold on several obvious fronts, but in the end, given the problems facing the next president, does McCain really want people to think about turning the country over to a business executive with zero political experience should something happen to McCain? I can't see it.

A Republican colleague made a suggestion to me earlier this week that struck me as absurd at first, but which on reflection has a logic to it: Condi Rice. Rice would be a bold pick, certainly -- black, female -- but also a reassuring one to many people. She's believed to be more liberal on social issues, which would give her appeal to moderates. Plus nobody can doubt that she'd be ready to assume command if McCain were to die or resign. And her training is in Soviet studies, which would make her especially useful in figuring out what to do with resurgent Russia, which is going to be one of the top foreign policy challenges of the next administration.

The thing that makes her distasteful to me is her role as a formulator and executor of Bush's foreign policy. The thing is, though, McCain is in every respect that matters an exemplar of Bush foreign policy. People who aren't going to vote for McCain because of this aren't likely to be persuaded by anyone he picks, so he's not going to lose them by picking a key Bush adviser.

So, a Rice pick makes sense. But nobody's talking about her much, so if McCain were to pick Rice, it would come out of the blue. It would be a real jolt, actually. In a good way.

Advertisement
Comments
John E. - Agn Stoic
August 28, 2008 7:37 PM

As I asked above earlier, just what has Condi accomplished in the past 8 years?

Kirk
August 28, 2008 9:59 PM

Condi Rice will not split the black vote. The "black vote" won't back a Republican. Naming her to the ticket would have the effect of losing more of the white vote than you would gain from the black vote, for a net loss.

The Man From K Street
August 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Not Meg. Carly. I predicted this early this summer.

Thomas R
August 29, 2008 2:53 AM

"She'll give the disenfranchised female vote, including the hard-core Hillary malcontents , somewhere to go." Gary L. N.

Maybe. Well if we mean only the conservative Democratic women who voted for Hillary.

"She'll split the Black vote" CR

I doubt it. She actually does have respect in parts of the black community for her life experiences, but I don't think that's enough. If Edwards had been the Democratic nominee against a McCain-Rice ticket I could see it. Polls indicated Edwards had rather soft-support in the black community. However that's not what happened. I don't see any indication black women are dissatisfied with Obama. Possibly she could add a couple percent among blacks as some black Republicans seem set to vote for Obama, but I think she'd lose some too and be a net wash.

Shawn morford
August 30, 2008 4:38 PM

I find it ironic that some who claims to be pro-life could live with the reality of virtually abandoning her infant special-needs child to enter this race that will take every ounce of her energy and time. How could she stand up her choice to bring this child into the world, and then walk away from that child in its most vulnerable and critical time of its life? A child (esp. a special needs child) needs its mom! I would applaud Sarah's decision to back out of this race after she realizes she has been picked more for her profile than her capabilities and after much prayer she determines she is guided to put her child first before stardom. I believe that Sarah will have angels who tell her it's been a mistake. I am very sorry this whole thing happened to her. It's NOT too late to say thanks, but no thanks. I will respect her for it.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.