Crunchy Con

Patience, please, with the comments

Thursday August 21, 2008

Categories: Housekeeping

Masha wrote from Russia to say one of her recent comments had been held; she wanted to know if it was held for technical or political reasons. Let me assure you all that if your comment has been held, it's almost certainly something that the anti-spam software did. There's one troll these days whose stuff is always unpublished by me, but in most cases, if your stuff doesn't publish it's because the blog software flagged it.

And here's the thing: it doesn't notify me. The only way I know you haven't been published is if you tell me. You have to do so fairly quickly, though, because the spam bucket fills up in less than 24 hours, and your comments are irrecoverable if they've been sitting there after a certain point. Please e-mail me soon if your stuff doesn't publish (rdreher (at) dallasnews.com). I'm usually instantly findable during the work day at that address.

Anyway, I just wanted to apologize if your stuff hasn't been publishing. Yesterday, the spam filter caught one of my own comments, for no apparent reason. The only reason I knew it was because I got the "your comment has been held for approval" window. Otherwise, I wouldn't have known.

Advertisement
Comments
dangermom
August 21, 2008 4:55 PM

Well, in that case, I wrote a comment to the 'drinking at 18' column last night, and it was held. I've been waiting for it to show up.

Cleveland
August 21, 2008 6:24 PM

Rod, I doubt anyone blames you personally. When I asked the other day why mine was being "held for approval", it was solely to elicit information on the trigger word that caused the dirty deed by the human-programmed system. I.E., if we knew what words to avoid, we would.

Erin Manning
August 21, 2008 6:55 PM

Cleveland, you'd think it would work that way, don't you? Take it from one who has had the privilege of operating the smoke and levers behind the wizard's curtain, so to speak, when I tell you it seems frustratingly random. If there are "trigger words" etc. I doubt Rod knows them; I know nobody gave me a list! :)

But live links seem just about always to hold up a comment, as most people have figured out. Other than that, there's either some incredibly complex algorithm at work, or it really is as random as it seems.

masha
August 22, 2008 5:57 AM

Sometimes software workes out good, my comment was angry response to comboxer Watcher, now i m even happy it was not posted :)

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.