Crunchy Con

The more Evangelicals change...

Thursday August 21, 2008

...the more they stay the same, according to a new Pew survey showing that for all the yakkity-yak about the Evangelical-Republican crack-up and Obama's religious outreach, white Evangelicals are backing McCain as strongly today as they backed Bush in the past. They're not nearly as enthusiastic for McCain, but they're still going to vote for him, they say.

The full Pew results are here. It's a very comprehensive poll, one that shows a rising sense among voters that churches are too involved in politics.

I wonder: has MSM eagerness for the Religious Right old guard to fade away caused the media to overplay the openness of white Evangelicals to Democrats? Over to you, Get Religionistas...

Advertisement
Comments
Ann
August 22, 2008 12:51 AM

What these candidates say is far less important thatn what they have already done. And are yet to do.

If McCain picks Lieberman or Ridge for his running mate, it will be the final nail for me. It was hard enough to get behind him anyway. If he chooses Romney, I'll stick, more or less unwillingly, but Obama is totally unacceptable, based on his extreme leftist mind-set, very unsavory associates, typical Chicago-machine activities, radical pro-abortion votes and propensity to say one thing to one group and the opposite to another during the campaign.

But many like me will watch the polls carefully and if their state looks like it is going for BO by enough of a margin that one vote won't make a difference, I'll bet there will be many write-ins or third party votes - to send a message that we will not be taken for granted any longer.

who knew
August 22, 2008 9:47 AM

Not to seem ignorant, but how does one go about writing in a vote? I to intend to write in Ron Paul but would have no idea how to go about it and I don't think the pleasant grandma sort of ladies running the polling place do either.

I also wonder if any provisions have been made for "write-in" votes with these "new-fangled" compooterized voting machines. Ours,for this year at least, are still the standard lever madels.

And the reason evangelicals, such as myself, almost always end up voting for the Republican candidate, no matter how greatly we disagree with them, is the simply "a third party vote is a vote for the Dem candidate" argument. Here's my argument, with McCain, no matter what he says, he will not be appointing truly conservative Supreme Court judges anyway, I'm not even sure they make those any more. The best we can hope for is more neo-cons, pro-choice and pro-eminent domain. I don't need it.

fbc
August 22, 2008 10:50 AM

Can't speak for your jurisdiction, who knew, but in mine (Oklahoma) it has been illegal as well as physically impossible to "write in" a candidate's name for many years.

The physically impossible part is due to the use of a computerized ballot which is read by a machine as you insert it in the ballot box. ANY marks outside of the boxes beside the pre-printed choices, automatically invalidate the vote.

Good luck with your state.

Secular Republican
August 22, 2008 2:35 PM

McCain and the GOP in general need to steer the party away from the Religious Right and ultra-right and back near the center as Clinton and the DLC tried to do with the Democrats. Only then can the Republicans win back the public, former GOP states, and previous huge electoral victories. McCain and the moderate, moderate conservative, and "RINO" Republicans shouldn't pay too much attention to the Limbaughs, Hannitys, Coulters, and Dobsons of the party. After all, the religious and social conservatives won't have anywhere else to go, so they'll have to learn to compromise as the liberals did when the moderate and conservative Dems flooded into Congress in '06.

Marian Neudel
August 22, 2008 4:50 PM

Re: write-in votes--check with your local chapter of League of Women Voters. They always have the straight dope.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.