I decided over the weekend to pick up and read Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals," to gain more insight into Barack Obama's mindset and methods. Obama trained under and worked for followers of the Chicago community organizer, who died in 1972. I'm about halfway through it, and I have to say it's a brilliant work of practical wisdom. I say this in the same sense I would recognize the greatness of Machiavelli: not as a guide to how one should behave, but as a guide for how someone unsentimental (that is, amoral) about the acquisition and use of power should approach the acquisition of same.
Anyway, when I finish the book, I'll be blogging on Alinsky's apparent influence on Obama's political methods -- Obama's rhetoric paying respect to conservative cultural values while actually voting left on issues having to do with those values is classic Alinsky. But early in the text is a great passage that tells a blunt truth about religious life, at least within a hierarchical church. I thought of Fr. John Peck's dilemma when I read it. I also thought of Catholic priests I know who have chosen their calling over careerism. Here's Alinsky:
Each year, for a number of years, the activists in the graduating class from a major Catholic seminary near Chicago would visit me for a day just before their ordination, with questions about values, revolutionary tactics, and such. Once, at the end of such a day, one of the seminarians said, "Mr. Alinsky, before we came here we met and agreed that there was one questions we particularly wanted to put to you. We're going to be ordained, and then we'll be assigned to different parishes, as assistants to -- frankly -- stuffy, reactionary old pastors. They will disapprove of a lot of what you and we believe in, and w will be put into a killing routine. Our question is: how do we keep our faith in true Christian values, everything we hope to do to change the system?"That was easy, I answered. "When you go out that door, just make your own personal decision about whether you want to be a bishop or a priest, and everything else will follow."
Wise words, even if they come from the mouth (or the pen) of Alinsky, who dedicated "Rules for Radicals" to "the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom -- Lucifer."

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
True, ChuckDFW. I'm not a journalist. I do read a lot of books, and generally love biographies and memoirs, but find I draw the line at most biographies or autobiographies dealing with living politicians. Usually, the ratio of spin and propaganda to the more authentic, if still subjective, memories and stories is just too great.
Since Rufus seems to have this absolute obsession with calling Obama "The Reverend" for some reason, I'd like to suggest the following pet names for other political figures in the interest of balance.
McCain = Oldster McCrankypants
Palin = Caribou Barbie
Biden = Senator Shoeswallower
Bush = Lamester McDuck
Cheney = Dr. Horrible (He has a PhD in Horribleness)
Paulson = Daddy WarNoBucks
Bu using these, we can insure that any potentially valuable or interesting commentary is transmuted by sheer childishness into petty partisan bickering, and thus save ourselves much reading.
JPL,
You're right.
I stand corrected.
I'm being perverse about the Reverend (aka He-At-Whom-We-May-Not-Laugh)
No President has ever been given a nickname.
Not Old Sink or Swim
Not Mad Tom
Not His Little Majesty
Not Old Hickory
Not General Mum
Not Ten-Cent Jimmy
Not Honest Abe
Not Granny
Not The Dude
Not The Beast from Buffalo
Not Kid-Gloves
Not The Major
Not Old Four Eyes
Not Big Chief
Not Silent Cal
Not Hoo-Yah
Not Ike
Not Tricky Dick
Not The Gipper aka Bonzo
Not Slick Willy aka Bubba
Not Dubya aka Shrub
Now, I realize that the Right Reverend Emmanuel Lewis Lightworker (the Latter Day Saint) is an altogether cooler cat than any of those I've just named.
But remember how broken my soul is, remember how broken all the souls are of all of us bitter kulaks here in Jesusland, bowing and scraping to our Golden Calf instead of the One.
Have patience on us, Brother JPL, have patience.
Come next January 2009, we all will be changed, changed utterly.
Shan't we? Shan't we? Shan't we?
"I do know that for many on the Christian Right, sexual matters are the only conservative values..." J Dave G
You don't know any such thing, my friend. The so-called Christian Right abhors more than the perversion of just "sexual matters". The object of our abhorrence (i.e., Homosocialism) is the Socialist perversion of government by Alinskyites, as well as the perversion of sex.
Why should anyone doubt that Obama, Alinskyite citizen of the world that he is, would be true to his promise to facilitate further perversion of sexuality and government?
Cleveland, my friend - I recall that your views are more comprehensive than many. I know quite a few on the Christian Right whose morality pretty much stops outside of abortion and homosexuality (waterboarding? fine. unrestrained materialism? no problem. death penalty? they deserve it. immigration? no way. Evironment? drill, baby, drill. Global warming? Al Gore is a dumbass. Palin lied? She's pro-life.)
Maybe I missed your point; I had trouble understanding what you wrote.
JPL: Oldster McCrankypants - that's terrific.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.