Crunchy Con

Dear Leader down for the count? Joy!

Tuesday September 9, 2008

Categories: International
Is it permissible to take pleasure and hope in the misfortune of others? Because I'm very pleased indeed at the news that the evil Kim Jong Il may have had a stroke. He truly is one of the most wicked...
Advertisement
Comments
Joe
September 9, 2008 3:58 PM

I believe that in Roman Catholic Theology, to which spiritual evil on another human being or to rejoice in the downfall of another human being is a very grave sin. I'm sure this is the case in Orthodoxy as well. Rod, you ask "Is it permissible to take pleasure and hope in the misfortune of others?" But the answer to that question is so obvious that it boggles my mind that you would proceed to deem yourself judge of another human being. Remember the prayer we pray prior to receiving the Eucharist,

"I believe Lord and profess that you are the Christ, the Son of the living God, come to save sinners, OF WHOM I AM CHIEF."

Joe
September 9, 2008 4:01 PM

I meant to say, "to wish spiritual evil on another human being..."

Shawn
September 9, 2008 4:06 PM

I'm not one to tap dance on graves, but if the stories are true, I hope some good for the North Korean people come of this.

Rufus Thomas
September 9, 2008 4:07 PM

At first I thought this post was going to be about the Lightworker's drop in the polls.

Joe
September 9, 2008 4:10 PM

By the way, I would make a distinction between feeling relief that a force of evil has now been terminated and joy over the actual misfortunate experienced by the human being who happens to be the force of evil. In other words, it is a sin to feel joy and happiness at the personal misfortune of Kim IL Jung but it is not a sin to feel relief that a very dangerous man may now be out of comission and there may be hope for North Koreans.

Adam01
September 9, 2008 4:27 PM

"we will all be better off when he is dead and buried."

Operating on the premise that this is true, who else in NK can hold it together long enough to make the transition to "a normal nation, not a pariah state."? Without it spiraling into chaos? That country has been the nutso fiefdom of the Kim family for what, 60 years?

Turmarion
September 9, 2008 4:33 PM

I think Joe's got it about right. There's the base, gut reaction (hah! you're about to bite it now, you old bastard!). Such a reaction is understandable, but it does not come from our best self, and we shouldn't cling to it. Next is the relief for the people of North Korea, which is perfectly acceptable. Finally, there should be prayers for Kim (or any other malefactor) regardless of how evil he is. Remember St. Silouan.

Rob
September 9, 2008 4:34 PM

"Is it permissible to take pleasure and hope in the misfortune of others?"

No.

I have to admit I often wondered why someone on our side hasn't taken him out, and I'd find it hard to imagine that North Korea wouldn't be a better place with him gone. Unless there are three worse evils waiting in the wings to take his place. But rejoicing in the misfortunes of others is a sin, for Christians, anyway.

BrianF
September 9, 2008 4:36 PM

The government of South Korea is probably rooting for Kim Jon Il's to stay alive harder than anybody. The costs of absorbing millions of malnourished people with no idea how to function in a market economy will shatter south Korea's economy

Kirk
September 9, 2008 4:42 PM

Rod, be careful what you wish for. Saddam Hussein was crazy too, but he kept the peace in Iraq and the trains ran on time.

Rod Dreher
September 9, 2008 4:45 PM

But the answer to that question is so obvious that it boggles my mind that you would proceed to deem yourself judge of another human being.

Is it that obvious? I should say that the thing I would want to see most of all is for Kim to repent. But failing that, I hope the tyrant dies and his people can be released from slavery. Would it have been wrong to have looked forward to Hitler's death? The Rev. Bonhoeffer not only thought it wasn't wrong, he participated in a plot to kill him. If it was not wrong to anticipate with relief Hitler's death, why is it wrong to feel the same way about Kim -- not so Kim will suffer, but so the suffering of the millions of men, women and children being ground down under his heel might end?

Tom
September 9, 2008 4:49 PM

Before we get too excited, let's see who is the replacement. He might be just as bad, or worse.

Joe
September 9, 2008 4:56 PM

Okay, fair enough Rod.

pentamom
September 9, 2008 4:57 PM

I have a hard time even imagining the concept of "worse," as pertains to the actual effect on actual Koreans. I wouldn't suggest that Kim Jong Il represents the summit of potential human evil, but I'm not sure there's much that could be done that would actually be worse for the people there to endure. Saddam's example notwithstanding, it's hard to describe NK as having the trains running on time, or anything working as it should.

I think Joe has it about right -- you need to distinguish between joy in a human soul's misfortune, and joy that the suffering of other human souls may be diminished by the incapacitation or death of the first person. After all, Kim was bound to suffer death or incapacity sooner or later (as we all are), and it really does appear to be a blessing to others if it happens sooner.

And, I do believe that Rod gets this as well.

Joe
September 9, 2008 5:05 PM

Yes, I too think that Rod gets it. At first, I wasn't sure because of Rod's initial question and because of this statement, "There's a special condo in hell for that cretin."

Thinking about this some more, I wonder if we shouldn't distinguish between a natural desire for justice and desire for revenge. To give an example, I may feel satisfaction that a heinous murderer is found guilty and sentenced to life in prison or death. But this is not necessarily the same as experiencing joy over the actual suffering that the murderer will face.

Watcher
September 9, 2008 5:07 PM

Rod, be careful what you wish for. Saddam Hussein was crazy too, but he kept the peace in Iraq and the trains ran on time.

Trains run on time? Saddam destroyed the whole of Iraq's infrastructure, by failing to spend a dime on it. Electricity was intermittent in Baghdad, and almost everywhere else was black most of the time.

Saddam destroyed the most fertile agricultural land in the whole middle east - the marshes and the farms watered by the river...

Saddam's roads and some minimal railroads fell apart and were never fixed.

There WAS NO PEACE under Saddam, at all. Millions of Iraqis were killed at the behest of Saddam. Every aspect of his administration was corrupt and incompetent. Not only was there no peace, there was no justice of any kind, and no ability to self govern by those who wanted free of his tyranny.

And the people who tried...Clinton sold down the river and let Saddam murder them wholesale.

Watcher
September 9, 2008 5:31 PM

I'm not goign to bother quoting, but I recall someone stating they needed a lesser tyrant to "hold it together" rather than spiraling into chaos.

Apparently, this person fails to realize the conditions within NK right now. Chaos, the kind of chaos that results from normal people making normal decisions not commanded by a tyrannical and malevolent government, is ASTRONOMICALLY better than what is now the "norm".

I am not an anarchist, and I don't believe in anarchy. I do believe that if the real monster himself were to expire, and the henchmen left behind were to kill each other off and decapitate the government, that conditions would actually IMPROVE due to the fact that people impose a self-regulating type of order over their everyday lives when given the chance to do so.

Exactly why these tyrants have been allowed by 'civilized' nations to continue to rule is an embarassment, and an indelible stain upon humanity. Every shred of human decency says we should have done something LONG ago.

Christopher Mohr
September 9, 2008 6:04 PM

"Exactly why these tyrants have been allowed by 'civilized' nations to continue to rule is an embarassment, and an indelible stain upon humanity. Every shred of human decency says we should have done something LONG ago."

watcher - that's exactly the kind of talk we don't need. If your desires were met, we'd be stuck policing every other nation, forcing them to assimilate to our goals. That's the democracy at a barrel, "do as we say or else". That kind of talk has no place in reality. It is unfortunate that our politicians and chattering heads run amok are stuck in notions of American manifest destiny.

Why not understand that not all people will be like us. Not all people work like us, and let them decide for themselves? The Russians did it. When the government was in the wrong, they rebelled. Not once but twice last century. If they can do it (under some of the most despotic governments known to man), then others (under equally or slightly less despotic leadership) can and will do the same, once it gets bad enough. Is it difficult to sit and wait? Yes. Is it necessary? Yes. Concentrate on building up our forces at home, and let the other nations figure it out. You get more bees with pollen-bearing flowers (aka the promise of something better within sight) than you ever will with a taser (aka current and past US foreign policy).

Technically, we did do something, and it ended up with what we have today. We may have more technology than we did then, but we still have the same mentality and the same obstacle: China, the puppetmaster. They have Kim held up by strings and they have us held up by different strings. Would I prefer that they (the North Koreans, or the Chinese) came around to our way of thinking? Yes. Is that going to happen? No. Get used to it.

Brendan Moran
September 9, 2008 7:53 PM

I can't say I'm unhappy to see Kim go, if indeed, he does go. I do worry about the transition: the total collapse of a society currently held together by "Juche" alone. Millions of people with no food no functional infrastructure basically have nothing but Kim's regime, and if the transition is handled poorly, it's sure to have a negative impact not only on North Korea, but also South Korea, China, possibly Japan.

Still, he was inevitably going to have to go, and we'd have to cross this bridge at some point, and this is probably the best way to have it happen. I am cautiously optimistic.

Watcher
September 9, 2008 8:11 PM

watcher - that's exactly the kind of talk we don't need. If your desires were met, we'd be stuck policing every other nation, forcing them to assimilate to our goals. That's the democracy at a barrel, "do as we say or else". That kind of talk has no place in reality. It is unfortunate that our politicians and chattering heads run amok are stuck in notions of American manifest destiny.

Ahh, yes, the old "the people chose to have a tyrant and who are we to judge the situation" canard.

Or, in other words "I really do hate our country and the way we do things, and how DARE you be so stupid as to think that anyone else can self-govern either! Much less be liberated from the tyrants we on the left LOVE SO MUCH!!!"

Cripes, what an absurd bit of tripe. Furthermore, your attitude is completely and utterly immoral, in your refusal to believe that human beings really DO deserve their God-given liberties. I cannot think of a more hideous "philosophy" to hold in relationship to your fellow man. This is worse than the contempt of the racist or cultural elitists, this is "not only do I not care, how DARE YOU BE SO STUPID as to think they should live in humane conditions!"

The only thing I think that could possibly penetrate your wall of self imposed imorality is to be unwillingly deposited in NK yourself, and be subject to the tyranny yourself. Roughly 24 hours and you'd be changed forever, once you realized just how impossibly inhumane your fellow libs are.

"I NEED OUT, we have no food, we're starving, we're being killed by our police, our government, our military, and we are not allowed to complain OR DO ANYTHING TO RELIEVE THE SITUATION" would be YOUR telegram or email or letter or phone call.

And I'd hope it arrived at one who retorted "No, that kind of thinking is dangerous, you need to remove your own demons, besides, it would be arrogant of us to presume that your leader is actually bad..."

Of course he's bad. Of course he needs to be deposed. And yes, I DO have the judgement and the moral certitude to say that without hesitation and further, on that matter, I am absolutely correct and you are absolutely wrong.

Period.

Any further argument on your part is pure fallacy.


MH
September 9, 2008 8:48 PM

Channeling Mister Peabody:

So you might say that Kim Jong's ill.

Anne
September 9, 2008 10:39 PM

Damn, Watcher, go have a drink.

Pastor Paul
September 9, 2008 11:18 PM

Paul the Apostle wrote in Romans 12: "Do not repay evil for evil. . . do not take revenge. . . leave room for God's wrath, for it is written, 'It is mine to avenge, I will repay.' On the contrary: 'If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink . . . DO NOT BE OVERCOME BY EVIL, BUT OVERCOME EVIL WITH GOOD.'"
However you choose to interpret this, I don't think it condones rejoicing over the suffering of even one as evil as the North Korean dictator--and there's no question that he is evil and the world will be better off without him.
Still, I find your tone to be all about rejoice at the evil one's suffering, contrary to what Jesus and the apostles taught.
Someone, by the way, referenced Bonhoeffer. It's true that he joined in the plot to assassinate Hitler. It's also true that he took no joy whatsoever in it, and felt that he was throwing himself at the mercy of God for participating in the plot to kill another human.
Shame on you, Rod. Your posting reminds me of those immature kids who stand outside the gates at executions and hold parties.

Kevin
September 9, 2008 11:26 PM

Having been to Panmunjom and the DMZ several times, I can't express with words the true sense of seeing North Korea. All I really got to see with my own eyes was the PRK side of the DMZ, but it was something of an education. Standing on an observation deck on the ROK side, you can see across to the hills across the way. They were all stripped bare of anything green while the ROK side was in full foliage. The people over there had evidently been eating it, making tea, soup, or what have you from leaves and bark, according to our guide. The PRK guards in the "peace village" were very well fed, indeed. a

At about the same time, around 1997 or 98, we, the U.S., had sent food aid. That food aid showed up in rations aboard an abandoned PRK submarine that the ROK subsequently seized. Take that for what it's worth....

Thomas R
September 10, 2008 5:50 AM

I remember when Kim Il-Sung died I had hope that the bizarre personality cult around him would decline and North Korea would become less oppressive. That was like a decade ago. (Kim Il Sung was the one for whom the personality cult started and he headed it longer. He is still seen, at times, as "Eternal Leader.")

An advantage in this case is that none of Kim Jong Il's sons seem to be old enough or in his good graces enough to take over. Still the idea that Jong-Il dying or retiring will bring betterment to North Korea seems naive to me on first blush. These people have been living under a familial personality cult for over 50 years. Most of them probably know nothing else. Even if he dies change will likely be gradual or may not happen at all. Even Turkmenistan is not exactly "free" years after Turkmenbashi died. For that matter Belarus has never been really free either despite the fall of Communism.

James
September 10, 2008 9:33 AM

Do you really think that Kim's death will change anything?

Joey
September 10, 2008 5:47 PM

I'm sorry, Rod, but I don't think it's good to take pleasure even in the suffering of such an evil man. You can be happy about what his death might bring; I think it's okay, perhaps, to "hope" for his death, in that it could be ultimately good for the Korean people and the world (though of course, the practicality of that is a bit suspect; who exactly will take his place?). But to be happy that he, himself, as a person (even an evil person) is suffering, is a different matter.

God bless.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.