Crunchy Con

Fr. Peck's Orthodox essay is gone

Sunday September 28, 2008

Categories: Orthodoxy

The other day, I posted a fantastic essay about the future of Orthodoxy in America by Fr. John Peck, a Greek Orthodox priest in Arizona. Guess what happened to it? It's gone from the American Orthodox Institute website, "removed at the author's request."

I wonder why the author had a change of heart? Was he pressured? Did his strongly stated view that the ethnic model of Orthodoxy in America (church as the tribe at prayer) had to change step on too many people's toes in high places? Did folks get upset with his saying churches have to get out of the restaurant/ethnic festival business and back into the soul-saving business? Below is a big chunk of the essay that I initially posted; regrettably, I don't have the entire thing. Revolutionary stuff. I know it was rocketing around the Internet last week among Orthodox laity and clergy.

UPDATE: I am told by an informed source that the Greek Orthodox hierarchy is coming down on Fr. Peck like a ton of bricks for that essay. Fr. Peck has been removed from his parish.

(From Fr. John Peck's essay about the Orthodoxy of tomorrow):

The notion that traditionally Orthodox ethnic groups (the group of 'our people' we hear so much about from our primates and hierarchs) are going to populate the ranks of the clergy, and therefore, the Church in the future is, frankly, a pipe dream. Orthodoxy, despite the failings of its leadership, has actually lived up to its own press. The truth of the Orthodox faith, as presented on paper, is actually being believed - by those who have no familial or historical connection with the Orthodox. These poor deluded souls (of which I count myself) actually believe what they are reading about the Orthodox faith, and expect the Church to act like, well, the Church. They refuse to accept the Church as a club of any kind, or closed circle kaffeeklatsch. No old world embassies will be tolerated for much longer - they will go the way of the dodo. No one will have to work against them; they will simply die from atrophy and neglect. The passing away of the Orthodox Church as ethnic club is already taking place. It will come to fruition in a short 10 years, 15 years in larger parishes.

This is a well known problem. Statistical studies taken a mere seven years ago predicted that within 10 years the Orthodox Church in the United States would for all practical purposes, no longer be viable. If nothing was done within five years (that's two years ago) the decline would be irreversible. Demographics determine destiny, as they say. As you may have imagined, not only was "nothing done," such reports were surreptitiously filed away, while the calls for a solution from clergy and laity alike only increased. Larger jurisdictions will, of course, have a little more time, but not a different result.

What we are looking at, of course, is of the highest concern to the hierarchy. They know, in their heart of hearts, that they cannot reverse this trend. Yet they fight a rearguard action, hoping against hope to forestall the historically inevitable movement toward an American Orthodox Church.

Statistical studies taken a mere seven years ago predicted that within 10 years the Orthodox Church in the United States would for all practical purposes, no longer be viable.

The laity has already moved on. Americans, generally, don't fall for very much strong arm intimidation or brow beating, don't go for bullying by insecure leaders, and certainly don't see the value of taking on and promoting someone else's ethnic culture. They care about the Gospel, and the Gospel does not require Slavonic or Koine Greek, or even English for that matter. The Gospel requires context, which is why it cannot be transmitted in any language unknown to the listener.

When we look at our seminaries, we are looking at the Church of Tomorrow, the Church twenty years from now. Indeed, this is the Church we are building today.

Oh, but this priest is just getting started. Check out some of his predictions for the future. They remind me of some of the things Pope Benedict foresees for Catholicism of the future in the West -- but this Orthodox priest is far blunter than even Benedict has been:


Vastly diminished parishes, both in size and number. There will be a few exceptions, (and they will be exceptional!) but for the most part, most current Orthodox parishioners will age and die, and have no one to replace them. Why? Because as they have taught the context of their culture, instead teaching the context of their faith. Some parishes will simply be merged with others. Many will close outright. A few will change how they do ministry, with a new vision of parochial ecclesiology. These newer parishes will be lighthouses of genuine Orthodox piety and experience. Some parishes, I believe, will actually be formed specifically, in the old fashion, by purchasing land, building a chapel or Temple in the midst of it, and parishioners building or buying homes around it. The Church will be the center of their lives, and many will come from far and wide to experience their way of life.

Publicly renowned Orthodox media and apologetic ministries. These ministries are the ones providing a living and powerful apologetic for the Orthodox faith in our culture (that is, our 21st Century life in the United States), and actually providing the Gospel in its proper context - engaged in society and the public arena. These will succeed in visibility and public awareness more than all the speeches before the U.N. and odd newspaper stories about Orthodox Easter or Folk Dance Festivals could ever do. In other words, the Orthodox Christian faith will become that most dangerous of all things - relevant to the lives of Americans, and known to all Americans as a genuinely American Christian entity.

More (and younger) bishops. If our current slate of bishops has been mostly a disappointment, reducing their number will only tighten this closed circle, making the hierarchy less and less accessible, and more and more immune to things like, oh, the needs and concerns of their flock. The process of selection for the episcopacy will contain a far more thorough investigation, and men with active homosexual tendencies, psychological problems, insecurities, or addictions will simply not make the cut. We aren't far from open persecution of Christians by secularists in this country, and we need bishops who know the score. With better bishops, no one will be able to 'buy' a priest out of a parish with a gift of cash. Conversely, parish councils will no longer be able to bully priests into staying out of their affairs, and will be required to get out of the restaurant/festival business and get into the soul saving business.

Advertisement
Comments
Linda
October 4, 2008 10:36 AM

Is the GOA dead or alive?
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles8/Barakas-Greek-Orthodox-
Church.php


The Time is Now
http://interfaith.goarch.org/thetimeisnow.asp


The future of the Orthodox Church, especially the GOA was the focus of Archbishop Iakavos' commissioned report in 1990 Clergy Laity ...

This sidetracked article from 1990 Clergy Laity should be revisited.


http://www.orthodoxdetroit.com/Abp%20IakovosTheologicalAgenda.pdf


The commission emphasized spiritual formation, catechesis, community
based on Christ and faith, and leaders as fathers and facilitators of
spiritual building up of the people of God rather than ambiguous
bureaucrats with ambivalence or lack of attachment and responsibility
for the people of God.

It named prominent Greek Americans and their Greek vs Orthodox
identity ... noting Sarbanes as the best of them (regardless of his
inconsistency to Orthodox principles on the floor).

Of course, being the GOA, the reality was addressed, again straight
look at attrition and negative zero Greek population replacements
(less Greek babies) and pushed to address the issue
of 'intermarriage' {more accurately, interfaith marriages} which lead
to the article by Fr Peter referenced previously (the Time Is Now),
though Archbishop Iakavos' report noted:

for a higher birthrate cannot be issued forcefully, or if issued,
have any impact.>>

Fr Peter in the Time is Now referenced above, footnoted that the solution for having more Greek babies would do little to stave off diminishing members.

Out of the horse's mouth www.goarch.org -- publications


Now from the Yearbook one can find camouflaged in the Alphabetical Directory of priests, all those with no assigned parish ...

Also from the Yearbook one can find that there are indeed underutilized and unserved parishes, dead or dying, with the appellation: served (occasionally) by Metropolis Clergy:

<*>>

Last check -- 70 in the GOA alone. The top listed is the Prescott, AZ parish to which Fr John Peck came to serve just six months ago from the OCA. So the trend is undeniable. And it was undeniable back

AZ
Prescott;

CA
St Gregory, El Cajon,
St Nicholas, Temecula,
St Spyridon, Upland;

CO
St John, Craig,
Prophet Elias, Hot Sulphur Springs,
St John, Pueblo;

CT,
3 Heirarchs, Storrs;

FL
St John, Destin,
St George, Hollywood,
Annunciation, N Miami,
St John, Panama City;

GA
St George, Brunswick,
Transfiguration, Columbus;

HI
Cathedral Honolulu,
Mission, Maui;

ID
Assumption, Pocatello;

IL,
3 Heirarchs, Champaign,
St Philip, Champaign,
St Barbara,Danville,
Annunciation, Kankakee;

IA
St John, Cedar Rapids,
St Demetrios, Waterloo,

KS
Holy Trinity, Wichita;

LA
Holy Trinity, Baton Rouge,
Ss Con & Helen, Monroe;

MD
St Theodore, Lanham;

MA
St Catherine, Braintree,
St Nicholas, Clinton,
St George, Southbridge;

MI
St Panteleimon, Lexington,
Assumption, Marquette,
St George, Sault Ste Marie;

MN
12 Apostles, Duluth;

MS
Holy Trinity, Biloxie;

MT
Ss Constantine Helen, Great Falls;

NC
St George, High Point,
St Luke, Mooresville;

NE
Holy Trinity, Grand Island,
Annunciation, Lincoln;

NV
St Alex, Ely,
St Barbara, McGill;

NH
Transfiguration, Franklin,
Taxiarchai, Laconia,
Assumption, Manchester,
St Nicholas, Manchester,
St Vasilios, Newport,
Assumption,Somersworth;

NJ
St Nicholas, Atlantic City;

NY
Holy Resurrection, Brookville,
Kimisis, Island Park,
Transfiguration, Matituck,
Annunciation, Vestal;

ND
(lost to the OCA);

OR
Mission, Salem;

PA
St Antony, Clairton,
St Mary's, Johnston,
Holy Trinity, State College,
Ss Const Helen, Vandergrift;

SC
Holy Resurrection, Hilton Head;

TX
St John, Amarillo,
St Andrew, Lubbock,
St George, Pt Arthur,
St John, Webster;

VA/
Nativity, Fredericksburg,
St Elpis, Hopewell,
St George,
Lynchburg,
St Nectarios, Pasco;

WV/
Assumption, Morgantown;
WY/ Holy Trinity, Rockville.

Priest Elias
October 4, 2008 12:35 PM

To my Brother Priests of Jesus Christ:

There is certainly much in Fr. John’s article, The Orthodox Church of Tomorrow, to agree to, to ponder, to discuss, to disturb and to inspire. I read the article when it was first posted, and bandied comments back and forth with a small group of trusted priest brothers in my diocese; the fact that we do so in private, carefully and discretely speaks for itself.

Some of what Fr. John said was old news, which we needed to hear nevertheless. The superstructure of our American church administrations is most assuredly in decline. The ethnic clubs of the past, whether they are Greek or some other ethnic variety, speak not at all to the faith of those who struggle to purify the passions and draw near to the Holy Things. The intense struggles that the regular priest in any parish must face as he battles unchecked human wills in the typical parish council meeting, not to mention Bible study or that hotbed of unchecked passion, the Kliros, are degrading, antithetical to the Great Commission that all of us have been given. All of this just said from a priest who has served a little mission for a little less than two years (I’m a fast learner, though) after two decades of formation in the Orthodox Church as a layman, a deacon, an assistant priest, and even more years before as a decade-long pastor of an ethnic protestant tradition (yes, they exist, and are remarkable similar in their dysfunctions to those of our own beloved Orthodox Church.)

I shared Fr. John’s article with one of my most trusted spiritual sons. He made the sign of the cross and smiled. “Excellent,” he said. “Excellent?” I asked with some exasperation. “Excellent,” he repeated. “There are still one or two of you who are unafraid to speak the truth regardless of the consequences.”

I won’t say how THAT conversation went. But, alas, he is right. He sees the truth and discerns the Holy Things. More about this I cannot say either. But he sees a time of trouble ahead for all of us, symbolized at the moment in this instance by what appears to be the heavy-handed discipline laid upon a priest who spoke the truth. I only have a few things to say about this (five, to be exact). You are, of course, free to stop reading. I understand. Who am I to say these things? But the Spirit blows where He wills, and I will say what I discern it to be necessary and right to say, openly. May I give right glory to Him!

First, about that persecution. No one seems to know what happened to Fr. John. I’ve asked my spiritual father, my brother priests and looked for answers on the Internet. Was he disciplined because of what he said? If so, why? Was he disobedient to a hierarch who told him not to publish his article? Or, did his words embarrass a hierarch who was accused in his heart over the truth of what he wrote? Disobedience would be a terrible thing. But if Fr. John was not disobedient, and spoke in the Spirit, as Christ calls Him and indeed all of us to do, then “Blessed are they who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake!” Our love and our prayers and our support must go out to him. We need to stop hiding in the shadows like roaches and come out to stand together for Christ, if we are to be His priests.

Second, about the Orthodox Church of tomorrow. I know nothing about demographics or statistics. I accept the conclusions of those who do know. Still, I have some experience with the ethnic parishes of the tradition in which I had served so many years ago before I was chrismated in the Holy Orthodox Church two decades ago. They are virtually all gone. Yes, gone. The people I loved and served, to whom I preached “po slovenksy” so long ago: gone. Their parishes have either closed or been diminished to small remnants of whatever their protestant tradition now allows; I do not know, and I refuse to look back. This will happen to us as well, unless the migrations continue to feed our ethnic parishes with new blood from the mother churches across the sea. But what I do know is that there is life in the alternative: life in new communities that form not around this or that ethnic identity, but around the Great Physician of our souls and bodies, Jesus Christ. But this will require a willingness to embrace new models of the priesthood and new models of parish life.


Third, the model of smaller and more intense communities. The Church will survive as a community of those who come to be healed – not as ethnic club, not as spinner of endless programs (Good Lord, is there no end to them!), not as social center, not as a place of nostalgia or remembrance of things past. The Church will survive as a hospital for the sick, the sick who come to receive the Holy Things of the Spirit. This is what is happening before my eyes in my little mission. Because of only a few people (one or two is all it takes), who truly discern the Holy Things and who have supported my priesthood – only a little leaven leavens the whole loaf – I have a collection of sick people who come to be healed; these form the core of my Community: a few “graduates” of this or that 12-step program, a few who have messed up their lives in other ways, and who have realized that they have nowhere else to go. (Yes, that’s it, isn’t it? To Whom CAN we go? Only you, Lord, have the words of eternal life.) To be sure, I also do have a few ethnic pockets of this or that old country tradition, a few worldly pockets who want the 7-11 model of the church, as my spiritual father calls it, a few who try to impose their nostalgia for remembrance of this or that past on all of us; but I will not have it. My task has been to stand face to face with them and try, sometimes with sheer guts, to point out their need for what God alone gives. Once, reacting to my directness, the parish council urged more money and a vacation on me; how strange was that meeting, and how sickening!

Fourth, the model of the worker priest. I would never suggest that worker priesthood should be the only model for the priesthood, but I humbly suggest that it should be one that takes its place next to the full-time priesthood with equal dignity and honor. Well, OK, maybe that’s too much to ask; at least with equal acceptance. Smaller communities of people who are very sick cannot support a full-time priesthood. They will come, and they may even tithe; but the widow’s mite, given in purity, still cannot support a priest and his family. This means that the priest may need to have an alternate means of income as well. I know the dangers, and it’s important that I admit them too: this alternate income, I think, should be one of necessity only. The priest must be the priest at all times, and his service to the Lord in his priesthood must be everything; that is, the priesthood may not be a secondary or extra-curricular activity; it must be everything. The priest must rely no less on the love of God, on the mercy of God, than he expects his people to do. He must give all to Christ, and do what Christ leads him to do in the priesthood. There can be no idea here of having it both ways: the world and the kingdom. Nor can there be any notion of the priest finding solace in his worldly employment; shame on him if he does; we must never labor for the bread that does not satisfy. Forgive my preaching, but here I preach to myself; the dangers are real, and I am all too aware of them as a worker priest myself.

Fifth, if you’re still reading that is, where do we go and what do we do? We stop competing with one another. We stop measuring our success on the basis of our parish income, our attendance, our recognition. We support one another and speak with brutal honesty and truth about the Holy Things, actually about ALL things, to our people and to one other as priests. We let the Spirit blow where He wills. We love one another, support one another, and embrace one another in our common priesthood. Let us not be ashamed of our Lord; let us be forthright, honest, fearless. If I am to be corrected, so be it; correct me in love. The time is coming when we will all need to be clear about Whom we serve and what we are about. We will need to allow the sword of the Spirit to slice through the nonsense. This is something all of us know, but all too soon we will need to stand together and act on it – together, as priests of the Living God.

Priest Elias
Westminster, MD

Steve
October 5, 2008 7:24 AM

Wow. For a long time now I’ve had an interest in Orthodoxy, but the ethnic thing is THE hurdle. As an example, there’s a Greek Orthodox Church 5 minutes from where I live. I once attended a Divine Liturgy there, and it was primarily in Greek. People were great, but also largely of Greek heritage. From everything I’ve read in the paper over the last few years, as a parish they’re struggling, and I believe problems now exist as far as holding on to a permanent priest. Currently, I believe they may be in a “circuit rider” mode. They have numerous “Greek” festivals during the year for fundraising purposes. This church is located in Spotsylvania County, Virginia, which probably has a very limited Greek community. As I said, I’m interested in Orthodoxy, but I’m not Greek, my family is not Greek, and I’m not going to pretend to be Greek in order to join the church. It’s a nonstarter. As I recall, one of the great things about the early days of Orthodox missions was that it went out to meet various peoples, and supplied them with a liturgy that they could understand. But now, this original strength has become petrified in the various Orthodox hiearchies into its opposite.

Thank you for posting Fr. Peck's letter. I ran across this site just by accident this morning.

Collin Michael Nunis
December 2, 2008 8:38 PM
http://cmnunis.wordpress.com

Fr. Gregory Peck should do well to find a new jurisdiction which promotes Christian thinking. As an established Orthodox priest, it is time for him to move on if the Church cannot get out of it's ethnic ghettos.

Collin Michael Nunis
December 2, 2008 8:44 PM

Rob, the link to the article is here...

http://www.byzcath.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/305923/Re:%20Essay%20by%20Father%20Peck,%20A%20Gr#Post305923

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.