E-mailed on Friday with a libertarian journalist friend the other day, who doesn't like McCain but is somewhat interested in Sarah Palin from a libertarian point of view. I directed her to Radley Balko's case for Palin on libertarian grounds. From Balko:
[A]s a libertarian, there's plenty I like about Palin. I don't agree with many of her culturally conservative positions, but she has for the most part declined to enshrine those views in public policy. Her lack of experience doesn't bother me much at all. Washington's in desperate need of fresh blood and fresh ideas, not the promotion of another five-term senator who's found a permanent home in the Beltway morass.But what I like about Palin should bother McCain. Palin actually has staked out unorthodox positions on a number of interesting issues, and they're issues that McCain and the Republican base that has embraced her would probably find troubling. Palin's taken a lot of heat, for example, for her (relatively loose) ties with the Alaska Independence Party, an organization that favors a vote on whether the state should secede from the union. Palin has also been friendly with the state's Libertarian Party. Palin's willingness to engage pro-liberty, deeply anti-federal political organizations--even fringe ones--is refreshing. But it's wholly at odds with John McCain's "country first" nationalist fervor.
Palin was also one of just three governors in the country to issue a proclamation in support of "Jurors' Rights" day, an event sponsored by the Fully Informed Jury Association, which encourages the doctrine of jury nullification. Nullification is an idea abhorred by tough-on-crime conservatives.
Palin also comes from a state whose constitution has one of the strongest privacy provisions in the country. Alaska's traditional reverence for privacy and personal autonomy is reflected in a number of issues that would likely be at odds with the national Republican Party--or at least the Bush administration--including a rejection of the Real ID Act, and the de facto decriminalization of marijuana.
Palin supported both the Iraq War and the surge, but in the past she has said she also supports a defined "exit strategy," an approach explicitly rejected by McCain, who has said we may well be in Iraq for decades.
Palin's persona thus far seems to be more in the tradition of Alaska's frontier, individualistic conservatism than John McCain's Weekly Standard-style national greatness conservatism. It's a philosophy that's skeptical of government, instead of what Repubilcans stand for now, which is to embrace government, so long as Republicans are running it.
This raises an interesting question, voiced by Tyler Cowen (H/T: Ross): Might Sarah Palin steal the conservative movement out from under the noses of the old guard?
Now that would be a reason to vote for her! Let me put the question to conservatives in the room: How do you think an ascendant Palin would change the conservative movement?

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I don't think Palin will deliver because I haven't seen her tested yet. Until I see otherwise, she's just another politician, policy wise.
As for stealing the party, Reagan did it. Genuine conservatives with solid political skills (not Ron Paul) will always win. The reason Palin is so popular is because finding a conservative with real political appeal is a challenge. Conservatives are by far the majority in the party, the "old guard" merely have the illusion of power, as long as they can serve up Hobson's choice in the primaries.
Watcher: You will never find libertarians or Democrats adopting conservatism as us "righties" define it (not Rod's wimpy, compromising version).
The problem with you, Watcher -- and I'm not the first person on this blog to recognize it, and say it -- is that you are a smart person who knows how to write, but just can't help yourself from being an obnoxious jerk. I've kicked you off this site before, but I let you back on. If I continue doing this, I'll have to explain why I follow a double standard. I'd rather not do that. If you would just learn to speak to your opponents, even people you do not respect, with a modicum of civility, you'd probably get along better in life. You'd certainly be welcome on this blog. But you've blown it.
Palin's circumstances will make it far more difficult to advocate for women (or men, for that matter) to stay home with their children. Women working outside the home will become the "norm", and the concerns of real normal families---the ones where parents actually stay at home to RAISE their children--will be pushed aside.
Traditional values took a major hit with the Palin pick.
Your servant,
Lord Karth
The more important question is how will Sarah Palin change the libertarian movement? It's already happening: an unwritten story, completely overlooked by the MSM. Over the summer Libertarian Presidential candidate Bob Barr was polling as high as 5 to 6% in Zogby, nationwide, and as high as 11% in New Hampshire, and 10% in Nevada.
Now, post-Palin, Libertarians have flocked to the GOP en masse and Barr has dropped down to 1%.
It's been amazing to see libertarians from across the libertarian spectrum saying nice things about Palin. And why not? This is a woman who attended two! Libertarian Party of Alaska meetings in Anchorage in 2005/06, and received their support in the last 3 days of the campaign for Governor.
Of course, the MSM chooses to ignore the libertarian angle, cause highlighting her libertarian support, as they've done with Palin's ties to the Alaska Indepence Party, would actually backfire. Lefties like to pretend their friends of libertarians. It always seems to happen around election time. If Palin gets tagged with the "libertarian" label, they will loose a valuable voting bloc. Thus, the word "libertarian" hardly ever gets used with Palin.
The more important question is how will Sarah Palin change the libertarian movement? It's already happening: an unwritten story, completely overlooked by the MSM. Over the summer Libertarian Presidential candidate Bob Barr was polling as high as 5 to 6% in Zogby, nationwide, and as high as 11% in New Hampshire, and 10% in Nevada.
Now, post-Palin, Libertarians have flocked to the GOP en masse and Barr has dropped down to 1%.
It's been amazing to see libertarians from across the libertarian spectrum saying nice things about Palin. And why not? This is a woman who attended two! Libertarian Party of Alaska meetings in Anchorage in 2005/06, and received their support in the last 3 days of the campaign for Governor.
Of course, the MSM chooses to ignore the libertarian angle, cause highlighting her libertarian support, as they've done with Palin's ties to the Alaska Indepence Party, would actually backfire. Lefties like to pretend their friends of libertarians. It always seems to happen around election time. If Palin gets tagged with the "libertarian" label, they will loose a valuable voting bloc. Thus, the word "libertarian" hardly ever gets used with Palin.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.