Obama, a "dusky Dukakis"?
Christopher Hitchens says Obama ought to be crushing the Republicans, who deserve to be drawn, quartered and fed to the buzzards. But he's not. Should Obama lose, Dems will tell themselves it's because he was just too dadgum decent to...
Like Spengler said a few weeks ago: Obama is long on brains and short on guts. Maybe we'll get lucky and he'll bring the wood to McCain in the debate this Friday.
Like Spengler said a few weeks ago: Obama is long on brains and short on guts. Maybe we'll get lucky and he'll bring the wood to McCain in the debate this Friday.
So far I've seen Obama compared to Kerry, Carter, Mondale and Dukakis and Eugene McCarthy. Basically, to every Democratic loser in the book. He was also compared to JFK, favorably. So basically, that's nearly every Democrat over the last 40 years. So what else is new?
I think the Hitch put his finger on the problem when he writes that Obama appears to have been looking more to 2012 or 2016. I don't think he was really ready for what happened when he took off, thus the inelegant Jeremiah Wright matter. We can chalk part of this up to inexperience, but even so, I'd think that someone seriously expecting to take the nomination would have dealt with the goofy reverend long before announcing his run.
Further, there is a hesitation on Obama's part to be his genuine self. Look at how he dealt with the Georgia issue. Some intelligent doubts expressed, only to be banished in the face of McCain's Manic Mouthings. This reaction demonstrated two very unpleasant things: 1. Obama is a afraid of a real tangle and 2. His view of the American voter is so dim that he doesn't expect them to sympathize with a restrained and cautious foreign policy. In fairness, I can't altogether disagree with the second point.
Obama is really in a bind intellectually and emotionally. He cannot propose any bold political or social initiatives because he needs every last vote he can get to put him over the top, and he has to keep his range of emotions narrow for fear that white Americans will respond negatively to an "angry black man".
The following words are those of traditional Catholic conservative Tom Piatak (who by the way stood up with Mr. Dreher in the face of PZ Myers vicious bigotry:
Indeed, NRO appears to have a crush on Comrade Hitchens. When he wrote a book trashing religious faith, the only review of his book to appear at NRO was one by Michael Novak, who termed Hitchens a “Treasure,” praised him as an exemplar of “moral heroism,” described him as “a public protagonist of solidarity and compassion,” and termed him a “brave and good man.” Apparently, to Novak, saying of Mother Teresa “I wish there was a hell for the bitch to go to” and praising Lenin’s murderous suppression of the Russian Orthodox Church does not debar one from the ranks of the “brave and good.”
I don't care how clever the man's rhetoric de jour is, he is, in the words of Pauline Kael re: "Forrest Gump" "beneath contempt" and Barry Goldwater's re: Nelson Rockefelelr at the 1964 GOP convention "unfit" for any blog holding itself out at traditionalist in matters of faith or politics. His comments above regarding Blessed Mother Teresa, along with his cold blooded adamancy in the face of moral appeals from his own friend Martin Amis regarding the Ukranian genocide, is sickening. What he said about Mother Teresa is far more odious than Sandra Bernhard's ripping off the veneer of what the SNL "Todd is an incestous redneck" Cultural Marxists really think about Palin and her kind.
Roy Cohn was a better human being than Christopher Hithchens on his best day.
At this point every pundit is striving to say something new, and in general failing to be convincing because, primarily, the tone of most political writing I see (including Hitchens) belies a sort of canabalistic / incestuous internal conversation. Meaning they're too busy (etc.) to actually interact with people outside their loop and get a feel for what's being said and felt 'out there'. Trust me when I say that McCain is not getting traction, and for every vote Palin secures, he loses one.
I said from day one that if McCain loses, the autopsy will say that the Palin pick was a brilliant jolt and the ultimate deal-breaker for reasons any analyst recognized early on...after screaming with glee and sobering up. And if Obama loses, yes the left will have many excuses and accusations. But my gut instint tells me that the polls are not reflective of a smoldering vengeance toward the GOP that is by now larger than life and SURE larger than the Democratic party or left wing extremists. No few conservative columnists are all but spitting---Rod being one.
Just relax and wait. It won't be pretty.
Maybe Obama has been reticent and gun-shy because of the fear that if he directly confronts how bad our situation is, the press will jump all over him as a defeatist and a loser, much as Carter was branded after his "malaise" speech. The only acceptable speech that politicians campaigning for national office feel that they can make is one in which the American people are praised for their many moral virtues and their responsible exercise of freedom. Even Churchill's "blood, toil, sweat, and tears" would be dismissed as too stodgy and burdensome for therapeutic postmodern America.
So, the ideal speech has to include generous dollops of "positive thinking" and populist flattery if it is going to inject some actual medicine for our military, economic, and moral woes. It's a major challenge, a long walk on a narrow fraying rope...
Maybe Obama can channel the spirits of Lincoln, Churchill, FDR, and JFK and hit this one out of the park. Or maybe too many people, like Krusty the Clown, don't want to hear the ends of any sentences.
The US is in two stalemated wars---started by a Republican. Its economy is taking on water---on a Republican's watch. Its long-term economic prospects are downright terrible---and a Republican President signed a measure that will demonstrably aggravate that. Democrats should be preparing to scrape John McCain off the bottom of their shoes. Yet McCain is managing to give Barry "the Slick" Obama a real run for his money---and may pull out a win. Why ?
First, let's be honest: Obama's---say it with me, people----BLACK. This still means a great deal, on a subconscious level, to a lot of people. There is a known phenomenon in polling, to the effect that voters, out of not wanting to appear disrespectful or "racist", will overestimate their support for a black candidate. I see nothing to indicate that that phenomenon is not at work here. The 3-5 point Obama lead in the polls is probably really a 2-point McCain lead.
I'm going to say something very politically incorrect here: if Barry Obama were white, the only way he'd have been able to go to the Democratic convention would have by buying a ticket. Residual "white guilt" on the part of the more leftish members of the Democratic wing, as well as the media, is largely responsible for Obama being where he is.
But the question remains---why is THIS black candidate having such a relatively hard go of it ? Other black candidates have had easier times; Colin Powell almost got the GOP nomination handed to him on a silver platter a while back, if I recall properly.
Youth and inexperience, for one. Not even two calendar years in the Senate, no known major legislation to his name; and only a pair of non-government jobs as a "constitutional law" professor (and just where are his published articles ?) and a "community organizer". Neither of these are perceived, or even perceivable, as having much of a real-world orientation or providing much in the way of real life experience.
No military service: The military is the ultimate in "real world experience"; there's nothing so basic as the blood-and-guts struggle for survival that is combat. It gets to one on a very basic level, and provides a certain credibility, a certain sense of "having laid it all on the line" that resonates with voters. McCain has that, Obama never will.
A lack of ability to connect emotionally with voters. This is not necessarily a function of wealth; FDR was wealthy and still managed four terms. But there is a certain disconnect that can be traced to wealth. Consider George H.W. Bush's public surprise at that most common of devices, a supermarket price scanner. On a more local and esoteric level, Rick Lazio is often considered to have begun his process of losing to now-Senator Hillary Clinton when he did not eat a sausage sandwich at the New York State Fair. A modern American candidate needs to be able to demonstrate what used to be called "the common touch", and on the subconscious level. Barack Obama does not have this, as may be witnessed by his primary comments about the rural proletariat "clinging to their religion".
Excessive perceived intellectualism. Barry Obama is a great public speaker, probably the best political orator of his generation. When he does give a speech, however, he is easily perceived as looking down at his audience. His background as a professor and his lack of ability to speak well outside of a large venue reinforce the subconscious impression that he is what used to be called an "egghead". That label did not do well by Adlai Stevenson in 1952 or 1956, and it will certainly do Barry the Slick no end of mischief in 2008.
All other things being equal, I would expect McCain to win under such circumstances. Not that I expect anything other than four years of paralysis under his Administration, should he win. But that's all right. A divided government is often a paralyzed one, and a paralyzed central government is one that cannot do as much damages to the liberties of the American people as might otherwise be the case.
I'll take that one at a black market price right now.
Your servant,
Lord Karth
Wow, Karth, I'd love to sit down over beer (or wine) and hear your takes on things for a long evening.
Irenaeus, I'm flattered. Thank you !
Any time you (not just Irenaeus, but any of you) are in the Cortland/Syracuse/Oswego NY area, let me know; I'll be more than happy to talk ears off over a beer (although blueberry or raspberry wine is also fine by me) and a Dinosaur Bar-B-Que rib platter.
Your servant,
Lord Karth
Christopher Hitchens attacks Barack Obama; on the other side of the coin, George Will attacks John McCain:
"Under the pressure of the financial crisis, one presidential candidate is behaving like a flustered rookie playing in a league too high. It is not Barack Obama.
Channeling his inner Queen of Hearts, John McCain furiously, and apparently without even looking around at facts, said Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, should be decapitated. This childish reflex provoked the Wall Street Journal to editorialize that "McCain untethered" -- disconnected from knowledge and principle -- had made a "false and deeply unfair" attack on Cox that was "unpresidential" and demonstrated that McCain "doesn't understand what's happening on Wall Street any better than Barack Obama does...
...For McCain, politics is always operatic, pitting people who agree with him against those who are "corrupt" or "betray the public's trust," two categories that seem to be exhaustive -- there are no other people. McCain's Manichaean worldview drove him to his signature legislative achievement, the McCain-Feingold law's restrictions on campaigning. Today, his campaign is creatively finding interstices in laws intended to restrict campaign giving and spending."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/22/AR2008092202583.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Shorter Hitchens: Obama is not as effective as he should be.
Shorter Will: McCain is a dangerous hothead.
Draw your own conclusions.
Kit Stolz @ 1:46 AM writes:
"Shorter Hitchens: Obama is not as effective as he should be.
Shorter Will: McCain is a dangerous hothead.
Draw your own conclusions."
All right: no matter who wins, we're in for 4 years of Great Value for Our Entertainment Dollar.
Anyone see where I put my popcorn ?
Your servant,
Lord Karth
Lord Karth,
Man, I miss Syracuse! Lived there for five years and was dragged kicking and screaming to Texas for the husband's job promotion. Lived there during Sausage-Sandwich-Gate and laughed every year after when the Clintons popped up at the fair, stuffing their faces with all the local food faves.
We would probably disagree on a few things politically (I'm more of a "crunchy conservative Democrat," if there is such a thing) but I thoroughly enjoy your posts and would meet you at Dinosaur for that beer, some pulled pork and conversation tomorrow if I could. :)
Kit Stoltz, you said:
"Shorter Hitchens: Obama is not as effective as he should be.
Shorter Will: McCain is a dangerous hothead."
I agree, to a great extent. McCain's proposals about how to manage the greatest crisis for our economy since the Great Depression amount to attempted scapegoating (the proposal to fire the head of the SEC) and railing against "corruption" on Wall Street and in Washington.
The problem is, due to the lack of regulatory oversight, which can be traced back, primarily, to the best of my knowledge, to the massive deregulation beginning during the Reagan Revolution, the whole Banking and Finance system may be corrupt or simply built on sand, but it is hard to get to the bottom of things.
McCain, through his stated support for deregulation and his record, has been part of the problem for 26 years. That is why, in my opinion, he is not proposing solutions that would actually get to the heart of the problem. Those solutions would go against his own oft-expressed convictions.
Lord Karth,
It does my (extremely Southern) heart no end of good to know that folks not only eat BBQ in New York state, but *pulled pork* at that.
What is the sauce like?
*Your* servant,
Rufus Thomas
Rufus Thomas @ 4:37 writes:
"It does my (extremely Southern) heart no end of good to know that folks not only eat BBQ in New York state, but *pulled pork* at that."
The Dinosaur is perhaps the most popular small restaurant in Central New York. I eat there regularly, and most days the lines are inordinate. You should see the place on weekend nights; it becomes a jazz club that attracts national talent.
"What is the sauce like?"
Which one ? The Dinosaur's sauces range from a mild sauce that even my two-year-old likes to an Habanero that will take the top of your head clean off.
Your servant,
Lord Karth
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.