Crunchy Con

Palin: "She's touchable."

Wednesday September 3, 2008

Categories: Republicans

Just back in Dallas from St. Paul. On the flight back, I sat next to a woman I'll call Jane. She was 55, a resident and native of a small Minnesota town north of the Twin Cities, and headed to Dallas for a meeting of the company she works for. She's in sales. She and her husband live out in the countryside, in a small house because that's what they can afford. They have a few horses, and a few acres. All their extended family live within easy driving distance. That's the best thing: to have your family around on the holidays, and anytime. People these days are too quick to walk away from their families for money. "Sometimes I think my generation has raised the 'walk-away' generation," she sighed.

Stick with me, this is going somewhere.

She talked about how this country is in serious trouble. Living beyond its means. People don't raise their kids right. Don't teach them to take care of things. People don't have respect anymore. No respect, and no faith. You've got to be willing to help yourself, and quit blaming other people for your own problems. She comes from a military family, and Bush has run the country into the ground with this Iraq war. Jane said she's a Catholic, but to hear her tell it, a rebellious one. She doesn't like "them" pushing people like her around. She's angry over the sex abuse scandal because it was ultimately about men thinking they're all high and mighty, and running over the little people. She admits that she hasn't done as good a job raising her kids in the Catholic faith as her grandma did with her. This bothers her.

The Republicans have royally screwed things up. The Democrats -- well, she can't go for them, because politicians, they'll tell you what you want to hear, but nobody's going to do anything worthwhile. You know who had it going on? Jesse Ventura. "You could trust what he said," Jane said. "He was a straight shooter. He didn't put up with that usual political bullshit. He shut the governor's mansion down because he said the state was wasting the people's money keeping it open."

She respects Barack Obama. "Given his racial background, you know he's had a lot to overcome in this world." But she just can't see voting for the Democrats this time around. Abortion matters to Jane "I don't like it," she said. "We weren't raised to believe in it. I've never believed in it."

"So," I asked. "What do you think about Sarah Palin?"

"Oh, I like her!" Jane said. "She's touchable. You know? I wasn't even going to vote in this election, but now I'm seriously thinking about voting for McCain. I've got no use for him, but I sure like her. She knows what it's like to be a real person. It kind of opens me up to what [the Republicans] have to say."

No kidding, Jane lit up talking about Palin. And then Jane told me how much it meant to her that Palin was standing by her daughter through this pregnancy. Jane said she got pregnant at 17, and married the father of her baby. She and her husband have been together for over 40 years. And Jane's adult daughter, who is 28, is now dealing with a pregnancy, though unmarried ("The birth control pill was giving her migraines, and her doctors were trying different doses"). Jane isn't pleased that her daughter is pregnant, but she is proud that her daughter didn't choose abortion. They're going to get through this as a family. She thinks Sarah Palin can relate to somebody like her, and her values, and her problems.

"From what I can tell, she doesn't take any crap," Jane said. "You watch, that gal is going to bring a lot of people over."

She's touchable. There's political power in that. I'm just sayin'.

Comments
Kevin
September 3, 2008 9:46 PM

I was one of those Minnesota Ventura voters in 1998. It was absolutely a vote against politics as usual as much as a vote for Jesse. That it only lasted one term neither surprised or saddened me, but the point was that Skip Humphrey and Norm Coleman just did not get that we the people were pissed at both of them, or at least enough of us in a 3-man race. I think they learned their lesson. If Coleman didn't, he has Al Franken to deal with this year.

In that vein, what Palin's candidacy means to me is that we aren't playing the same s###/different election game as we always seem to do. Is she unknown? Well, ja, but do your homework then. Do your homework on Obama, too. When I actually read the link Rod provided of his speech on the NYT last week, instead of just watching, my enthusiasm dipped considerably-- as written, it came across as weak liberal talking points that have been around since I was a yungun. Change? Not hardly.

BTW, I just downloaded the new Google Chrome, and I'm typing this on it. Verrrrry smooth. Nice streamlined format. I may still use Mozilla Firefox for my academic stuff, but this is great for general purpose. Internet Explorer is toast.


Karen Brown
September 4, 2008 9:49 AM

What on earth does being 'touchable' have to do with being VP?

I mean, not like you're going to be touching her once she's VP. The Secret Service would kick your butt, and rightfully so.

Is it only women who have to be 'touchable' in their political personas?

Has any male candidate ever been described (well, positively) with the word 'touchable'?

I don't think anyone would ever use that word for any VP I can think of in recent memory.. (And given the photos I've seen of people from the 1800's on back, I don't know if you can call ANY of them 'touchable' looking.)

David J. White
September 4, 2008 10:32 AM

"Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President?..."

Actually, given the history of presidential elections, the voters seem to have decided that, for the most part, senators are not qualified to be president.

One of the real historical oddities of this election is not the fact that, for the first time, neither major-party ticket consists of two white men; but the fact that, whoever wins, a sitting senator will be elected president. The last time that happened was in 1960. Before that ... I really don't know who the last sitting senator elected president was before JFK. I think we might have to go back to the 19th century.

***

OK, I just Googled it. Harding was a sitting senator when he was elected president. But he's the only other one. Period. No one else has gone directly from the Senate to the White House.

There were other men who had served in the Senate who became president (e.g. Truman, Nixon), but they weren't sitting senators at the time they became president.

***

Every election cycle, a number of senators always put themselves forward as candidates for president. But historically the voters have shown a marked disinclination to elect a senator as president, preferring to elect governors.

David J. White
September 4, 2008 10:51 AM

"If the kids are off limits and not to be used for political purposes, is scheduling a meet and greet between John McCain and the kids on an airport tarmac really the best idea?"

Good question. What about sending Chelsea on the campaign trail? What about parading Obama's kids around the stage at the DNC?


Absolutely. I nearly had my head ripped off on another thread for suggested that, if you don't want your kids to be used as fodder by your adversaries, then you yourself shouldn't exploit them for political purposes, either. If kids are to be off limits for criticism, they should also be off limits for boosterism.

Anduril
September 4, 2008 3:37 PM

OK, I just Googled it. Harding was a sitting senator when he was elected president. But he's the only other one. Period. No one else has gone directly from the Senate to the White House.

Kennedy?

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement