Crunchy Con

Poulos: McCain jumps the shark

Thursday September 25, 2008

Categories: Republicans

James Poulos thinks it's responsible for McCain to have suspended his campaign to work on the economic crisis. But overall, Mac's move stinks. Excerpt:

John McCain's September surprise -- suspending his campaign, pending resolution of the massive bailout bill conundrum, and postponing the first Presidential debate in the bargain -- is an act of shark-jumping worthy of Evel Knievel. For at once it cements all of our reigning prejudices and caricatures of the man: impulsive maverick, careless egomaniac, bold decider, patriotic drama queen. You take the good, you take the bad; you take them both and there you have the facts of Mac. But McCain's high-stakes, high-flying move needs to be brought back down to earth -- if for no other reason that to get clear in our minds whether he's doing right by we the people. Because, after all, that's the basis on which he's justifying this extraordinary decision.

I had not realized, until reading Poulos' piece, that McCain is offering to move Friday's planned debate to the slot already set aside for the vice presidential debate. Say what?! Sure enough, the Dallas Morning News reports:

The McCain campaign floated the idea of holding the first debate next Thursday in St. Louis, using the slot set aside for the vice presidential debate. It was unclear whether that would mean there would be two, rather than three, presidential debates. It also wasn't clear if or when a debate would take place between Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Joe Biden.

Well, that pretty much settles it: Team McCain is scared for Sarah Palin to face the public. I don't believe McCain is scared to debate Obama at all; I think he's aiming for a trifecta here: 1) doing something dramatic to shake up a campaign he's losing; 2) get credit for leadership in crisis instead of talk; and 3) save Palin from having to face Joe Biden and the American people. As you know, I was prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt on the leadership question, because I think it's right and proper for a US Senator -- which McCain is, which Obama is -- who's also running for president to be closely involved in these critical negotiations. But the Palin debate substitution aspect of the deal really does give the game away, doesn't it?

Advertisement
Comments
SiliconValleySteve
September 25, 2008 3:04 PM

IK, confused? Just plain stupid. Biden has a record of lying about his academic record. (he was a poor student) The guy has a mouth with nothing behind it.

Doug Cramer
September 25, 2008 3:15 PM

Considering all the industry consolidation we're seeing, at this point might it possible for the Obama campaign to simply acquire/buy out the McCain campaign? I'm in the mood to see doomed, inefficient national businesses (like McCain-Pain '08) put out of their misery.

Bless,
Doug

Insane Kitten
September 25, 2008 3:15 PM

Seriously Steve, you don't want to get in a discussion about which VP candidate is a bigger liar. Biden's gaffes and lies are simply not at the same level or volume as Palin's, and she's only been on the national stage a few weeks. Palin is Tommy Flanagan with lipstick.

bb
September 25, 2008 6:51 PM

Biden a poor student? McCain was last in his class, and Palin's degree is in journalism, for pete's sake.

Denise
September 25, 2008 10:53 PM

Palin/Biden debate = caribou in the headlights = Alaskan roadkill = damaged Obama campaign bus. It won't be pleasant.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.