Crunchy Con

The Bush "rescue" (bailout) speech

Wednesday September 24, 2008

Well, what'd you think of the president's speech tonight? Me, I don't know. I wish I could believe him. Of all the times when he needed to have the credibility to lead...

But I don't know what Congress should do. If they do what he wants, it's going to have to be in spite of him, not because of him. I really just want him gone, and I wish it were possible to emotionally disentangle my anger at him for the role he played in driving our nation into the ditch from the urgent need to deal with this crisis.

Your thoughts?

Advertisement
Comments
Rufus Thomas
September 25, 2008 9:44 AM

Scott in PA knows whereof he speaks.

Which is why he knows what sense it makes right now to pass the baton to *a diversity pimp.*

One with no executive experience.

One with no economic expertise.

One whose pick for Treasury was one of the first sub-prime lenders to go under in the current mess.

Which is not even to utter the names that go with the initials FM, FM, JJ, and FR.

DC
September 25, 2008 5:04 PM

Yes, Angie, I was referring to the Community Reinvestment Act. The Wikipedia entry is wildly skewed by those who are trying to spin this mess, so please do not take it too seriously.

The problem was not the push to make mortgages available to people who would not otherwise qualify. The problem was in (1) creating derivative securities of such opacity and complexity that they were allowed to be massively overvalued on the companies' books, supporting literally billions of dollars of bonuses to executives who were paid based on the number of transactions rather than the quality of transactions, while somnolent legislators and regulators and enforcement divisions and shareholders and press allowed it to happen, and then (2) the purchase of these worthless securities by customers like the Chinese, who use their hundreds of billions of dollars holdings in our debt securities to extort us to bail them out. Just as in the S&L mess, Wall Street lobbyists created legislation that essentially gave all of the downside risk to the taxpayers and all of the upside gains to the financial houses.

I'm just worried that the bailout will repeat that terrible mistake.

Kevin Divine
September 25, 2008 11:37 PM

The Wikipedia entry is wildly skewed by those who are trying to spin this mess, so please do not take it too seriously.

As an aside, in my academic life, Wikipedia is a no no. As Stephen Colbert noted, things on Wikipedia aren't true on their own, but because enough people say so. There's a big difference.

DavidTC
September 27, 2008 9:33 AM

Screw the bailout. Just, seriously, it's insane. Forget the whole thing.

If we need companies to keep making loans, we should make money available to other companies and let them carry on. And we already bailed out Fannie and Freddie, so they can carry on with their purpose of purchasing conforming loans.

Same with collapsing banks. Yeah, FDIC is near broke and can't handle the level of demands if multiple large banks collapse at once...so let's bail FDIC out, instead of the banks. Sheesh. What is this, rocket science?

Likewise, with AIG, if it's really important that their insurance actually cover stuff, let us simply state that we will cover any shortfalls for existing policies, so if that company disintegrates due to lack of money, companies are still covered. We don't need to give AIG a dime.

These companies are only 'too big to fail' if we implement no recovery plan when they do. I said, let them fail, and let's stand there with a team waiting for it.

And, while we're at it, let's make sure we don't confuse 'plummeting stock prices' with 'failure'. Plummeting stock prices just means a competitor will snatch it up for cheap. Stock prices cannot lead to the failure of a company, just the hostile takeover.

And, to point out here what I've been pointing out to everyone in real life, right now, about $110 billion dollars of mortgages are in default in the entire country, aka, 1%, and something like 60%-80% of their value is eventually recoverable.

So, um...what's this '$700 billion'? That's something like 6% of all mortgages.

See, folks, you thought it was a good thing the Democrats have been completely spineless the last few years, and now you're seeing the real problem. It's going to be you guys that stops this thing, because Congressional Democrats are total morons who forget what happened the last few times they were rushed into a bill.

Paul & Nader v Bailout!
October 2, 2008 6:07 PM

Staged "debate" dance now ready for 24/7 consumption -
Bailout Barack Obama w/partner Bailout John McCain.

Full-spectrum media suppression/distortion
target Ralph Nader and Ron Paul.

Your vote is your power,
they fear it, use it.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.