Among some Republicans who admit that Sarah Palin has more or less blown her interviews to this point, there's developing a sense that the McCain people are screwing Palin up by cramming her head full off factoids and talking points. If they just back off and let Palin be Palin, the theory goes, she'll do much better in these interviews.
The problem with this, says Julian Sanchez:
It's a nice enough theory, but where exactly is the evidence for it? Sure, we can look back and find instances where she's handled herself more competently, but her gaffes have not been, as some of her apologists seem to want to imply, a matter of getting flustered by her failure to recall the name of the Brazilian finance minister. Her problem is not mastery of the details: It's fundamental cluelessness about how the economy works, and a demonstrable inability to conceive of foreign policy in anything but the crudest terms.
He goes on to say that Palin's answers so far suggest that she's a dim bulb, or that her ignorance of these important issues is so deep that she's not likely to make up for it by intensive briefings. I think this is true -- and I don't believe for a second that she's dumb. Just profoundly incurious and therefore manipulable.
I ask those who still believe in the Palin candidacy: where's the evidence that there's more to her than what we've seen on these interviews? I'm not asking to be snarky; I really want to know.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
This is simple - instead of putting her in front of Liberal Interviewers who hand her a pop quiz with the intention of crushing her, let her say what she believes in - which is why I am going to vote for her - God, Guns, rollback of Infanticide, American Oil, Strong Defense, Conservative fiscal policy.
I'm sorry, but Obama's college record isn't that impressive. He is part of the current student culture that real scholars, that are becoming continually marginalized, have mocked for generations.
His education, and his record as an educator, is stuffed full of pie in the sky Marxist nonsense that doesn't stand up to the foundations of Western scholarship at all. The entire curriculum is about a political philosophy that derives itself from a series of false premises.
It isn't something that needs to be proven, and has no history, and the types of Professors that live by it, are themselves largely inherently incurious. They are about as scholarly as your average evangelical creationist. Certainly neither feels the need to adhere to any amount of empiricism or Hellenic logic to come to conclusions about the world. They are more capable of couching their political beliefs in euphemisms and sounding sophisticated than creationist neanderthals, but they are both neanderthals.
So, why is the Ivy League, and college education in general sneered at by so many? It isn't just those that never went to, or finished college, but those that did go through it that sneer at it as well. Anyone who has been to one of these institutions, like Occidental, or Columbia in the past 50 years knows full well that all you have to do to get a free ride is to hand pick readily available Marxist professors, adopt their political philosophy, and put your intellectual curiosity on hold for a few years.
Trust me, even if you don't pick out the worst of what Red Academia has to offer in terms of professors you will still have to Leftist up your course work or see your GPA suffer for it. So much of Academia now is blatantly anti-intellectual. There is no goal, no intention, of actually teaching subjects or encouraging real critical thinking. "Critical Thinking" is now newspeak for Leftist ideology. If you read Marx, or god forbid Zinn, Chomsky, or any other modern Heroes of the Revolution, and think its not the work of abjectly inspired genius then in fact, you are not engaging in "Critical Thinking".
Look up Obama's record as a lecturer, and his teaching materials. Tell me that any of that is the mark of intellectual curiousity. It is dogmatic adherence to everything the man was fed from childhood until now, mixed in with some Black Nationalist rhetoric. Nothing he has written, including his two books, deviates very far from the espoused beliefs of those who influenced him throughout his very early life.
Now how many of you can look back to your freshman year of college, and say that now as adults decades later, have essentially the same exact political and world views? That isn't a mark of intellectual curiosity. I'm sorry.
This isn't a defense of Palin obviously, but please feel free to tear her down without holding up Obama and along with him the current anti-illectual college culture. Bob from Colorado wants to look at the history of education. Looking at it for me, I see that when the anti-illectual bolshevik thugs came to power in Russia, and China and everywhere else, the first people to go were the Professors and their students. The big difference now, is that when the anti-illectual thugs come to power they instead thank those Professors and their students for their invaluable service to the Revolution.
Palin's a sitting duck . Yes she won an election for the Governorship in Alaska , but what does that really say ? A sparcly populated State with an isolationist attitude , a marriage with big oil , and a disdain for the lower 48 . She's got a momsy charisma , the slang of a been thru the mill mom...been there done that , about the same as 100 million other American Moms . She hasn't got aclue about the issues facing the nation , foreign or domestic . She might as well have been the mayor of D.C. but less in touch . I'm sure she's a great Mom and an honest person [that is honest as a politician can be ].
When you haven't studied , cramming doesn't work .Nerves will wipeout any memorization . "Being herself " is all she's got . Proving she is qualified to be one heart beat away from a 72 yr old Pres .? No way .
Her only hope is a blundering Biden , known for inappropriate remarks , and himself not being anywhere near the sharpest knife in the drawer .
I can think of a hundred other much more qualified women in this country McCain could've picked , but McCain blundered in his attempt to win Semi-Feminist , -anti-abortion , religious right women voters .
The only way Palin makes a good showing is if Biden shoots himself in the foot .
But Hey , dumb-as-a-rock vp running mates have made it before ...both Dems and Gop .
And given the way this country votes , she just might make it , in spite of herself .
Anything goes ....but be prepared to CRINGE in front of your tv sets .
my apologies for that triple post, my bad ,I hit the button too many times ....sorry about that .
p.s. Quayle immediately comes to mind when I listen to palin ....good looks , charisma , but nothing on the cap ...I'll throw in Gore too [you know , the inventor of the internet ]
The successful scholars could read your topic close to this post and order the publish dissertation at the dissertation service.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.