Crunchy Con

Anthony Esolen's Rules

Sunday October 5, 2008

Categories: Culture, Family
At Mere Comments, Anthony Esolen has posted a personal list of his Rules to guide young people into matrimony. They're funny and wise. For example: + Never marry a man who is not admired by respectable male friends. The people...
Advertisement
Comments
Rachel
October 5, 2008 11:05 PM

Great list! I would add:

Never marry a person who's bitter toward his/her ex. He or she is still harboring feelings.

Never marry a person who is too friendly with his or her ex. Cordial is fine, being buddies is not.

Never marry a person who still has the belongings of an ex in his or her possession.

Never marry a person who is in group therapy. You have no privacy, and he or she is discussing matters that should be discussed only with you with others.

Never marry a person who enjoys poor health. There's a distinction between that and somebody who is sick or disabled.

It's okay to marry a person who is unemployed (if it doesn't matter to you and the other income isn't required); but never marry anybody who does nothing.

steve
October 5, 2008 11:05 PM

Never marry someone who is afraid to get their hands messy when they eat.

Never marry someone who doesnt pray.

Never marry someone who doesnt read.

Never marry someone who cannot laugh at their own mistakes.

Steve

Mark Adams
October 5, 2008 11:08 PM

These are, for the most part, idiotic (even if they are a bit tongue in cheek).

"Don't marry a man who is neater than you are."

Huh? Why? Does that make him gay or something. You know, some women aren't that neat and some men are particularly orderly. Maybe some couples can make that work.

"You may, however, marry a man who polishes his tools and puts them away after use"

B/c then you know he's not gay I guess.

"Don't marry anybody who insists on a separate bank account, bed, bathroom, vacation, or zip code."

I'm sure my wife would agree with me when I say that it would be quite wonderful if we could have separate bathrooms and I assure you are marriage would be the better, not worse, for it.

"Don't marry a man who does not like dogs. Such men do not like children."

Don't really care for dogs. I love (and like) my children very much though.

"Never marry . . . a man who does not like to help out with the removal of a junked car, regardless of how much he knows about junked cars."

Why would you want to help out with the removal of a junked car? Sounds like a dreadful chore to me.

"By all means marry a . . .man who looks at a mudslide and says, 'I can make a really fine wall out of that.'"

Now I'm just confused. What the hell is a really fine wall? And mudslide? Is he talking about a real mudslide or a dessert prepared by your wife who likes to feed people.

"Never marry anyone who is not interested in looking at your fourth-grade yearbook. "

Dear lord, are you kidding me.

doug
October 5, 2008 11:26 PM

Never marry a woman who has a tattoo of a dagger anywhere on her body

Ethan C.
October 6, 2008 12:04 AM

You may marry a man with multiple tattoos, but only if he can explain the occasion and significance of each one. Evasiveness in this area is a deal-breaker.

Elizabeth Anne
October 6, 2008 12:07 AM

Never marry anyone who doesn't tip well. The entire point of going out to dinner with someone is to see how they treat people they don't HAVE to be polite to (IE, servers, bartenders, hosts, etc.)

rombald
October 6, 2008 12:20 AM

Cheats and thugs, fair enough, but condemning losers sounds a bit un-Christian (not that I would know!).

Tattoos - never marry anyone, male or female, who has any. The same goes for ear and nose piercings. At risk of cutting down the options too far, I would be tempted to distrust any woman who shaves her legs or man who shaves his face. Or who wears any jewellery.

Grumpy Old Man
October 6, 2008 12:37 AM

Never date, let alone marry, a woman with more than three cats. Three is borderline.


AnotherBeliever
October 6, 2008 12:46 AM

A separate bank account is merely prudent. It needn't be large, but it's good to have in case of emergencies. Maybe I'm only saying this because my family is military, for generations back. You should be open about this, of course. Financial secrets can't be good for a marriage.

However, one can never agree with everything on a list. :) Certainly all are things to keep in mind. There is some measure of truth in a lot of the list.

At any rate, the man I marry has to read widely and/deeply, and laugh, and know how to relax. He also has to be a man of honor, who appreciates valor even if he feels he falls short of it, and a man who has faced trial, and come through it. He should also be at home in the outdoors, because that's where I am most at peace.

AnotherBeliever
October 6, 2008 12:52 AM

You may marry a man with multiple tattoos, but only if he can explain the occasion and significance of each one. Evasiveness in this area is a deal-breaker.

Posted by: Ethan C. | October 6, 2008 12:04 AM

This makes me laugh! Maybe if his FRIENDS can account for what happened the evening of acquiring the thing.... ha ha....

M.Z. Forrest
October 6, 2008 12:54 AM

Never marry.

;-)

Perhaps I'm getting humility in old age, but I have greater difficulty coming up with these lists, mainly because I can think of several counter examples for each and a counterexample of perfection to boot. Most of the items simply aren't all that important although one can recall a humorous example involving some.

Most of the list can be drilled down to one rule: Don't marry someone that is immature, and don't marry someone that has become set in their ways. Needless to say, that rule is worthless.

Grumpy Old Man is right about staying away from cat ladies though.

Sally Rogers
October 6, 2008 3:44 AM

Huh. I always kind of assumed "AnotherBeliever" was a man, but I guess since she is talking of the man she will marry that my assumption was obviously wrong. (unless I am wrongly assuming again, and he is a gay man planning to marry another man, but I doubt this). Hello, sister. Funny how you create an image of the people who comment here.

My Dad told me that his mom had a whole checklist of these items for his sisters, but I can only remember a few:

Make sure he is a safe driver.

Make sure he doesn't drink too much.

Religion - was a given, he should be Catholic.

Make sure he is kind to people who are weaker than he.

It's best if he has at least one skill at which he is very good.

Wish I could remember the rest.

Brett
October 6, 2008 8:47 AM

For numbers 2 through 6 below, I learned the hard way.

1) Look closely at the person's behavior since you've known them. Especially look for instances of instability, controlling, manipulation. Ask yourself, if this became 100 times worse, would I be happy?

2) Has the person ever had any diagnosis or treatment for any psychiatric or psychological problem, no matter when, no matter how minor?

3) Was the person abused in any way as a child, or neglected, or abandoned?

4) Was the person sexually abused or assaulted at any stage of life?

5) Was either parent an alcoholic?

6) Examine what the person has done, where they have been, as an adult. Any evasiveness, or things that don't seem normal, then get away. Don't hesitate.

If the answers to any of these are "yes", then don't walk away. Run away. As fast as you can.

anon
October 6, 2008 9:18 AM

Good luck with your search Brett. I hope you are as perfect as the mate you are seeking.

FYI - I was abused as a child, my mother is an alcoholic and I have been treated in the past for depression. My husband and I just celebrated our 20th wedding anniversary and have raised two wonderful children. We are closer now than we have ever been and both agree that we would do it all over again in a heartbeat. In some people difficult circumstances can build character.

Nick the Greek
October 6, 2008 9:35 AM

My rule: ignore these lists of rules and create your own. In the words of the poets: "The world don't move to the beat of just one drum, what might be right for you might not be right for some".

John in Indy
October 6, 2008 9:45 AM

Trite for the most part. Also, he might consider updating his boilerplate. Maureen O'Hara? Joan Crawford? Jane Wyman? Burt Lancaster? Is he talking to college students who actually are likely to be married soon, or to their (great) grandparents? Other than a handful of the rules that can be summed up as "don't marry a jerk or a liar," I can think of counterexamples on nearly all of the rules. I know happily married people who don't like dogs; where the husband is neater than the wife; with separate bank accounts and bathrooms; where the woman exercises almost religiously (many women I know work out precisely because they want to have kids and want to start from a thin baseline); where one or both of the spouses don't like football; where one or both of the spouses is a feminist; where a sister-in-law doesn't like the husband.

I thought the most insightful of the rules was the one about taking a look at who his or her friends are. Ironically, I have used this rule in my own life in cutting some slack to my wife's sister's husband. My wife can't stand him, and he can be a bit of a know-it-all blowhard, but he has lots of long-lasting friendships with seemingly good people, so I tend to think he's a good guy, even if we aren't buddies. He's a devoted husband and father and a good provider. But if his wife had put more stock in her sister's opinion, she would have passed on marrying this good man. Of course, I suppose Esolen would then say there is something wrong with my wife. I disagree with her on this point, but don't we all have our faults, our low moments, our idiosyncrasies, our occasions of thoughtlessness? A list-based approach can mean throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Brett
October 6, 2008 9:54 AM

anon - I've been married 8 years. All the things I warned about in my earlier post were true about my spouse. I could write a long book about all I've been through. Here are a few highlights. Keep in mind, none of this happened before we got married. No warning signs at all.

For years, I was subjected to incredible outbursts of anger. I could be attacked, yelled at, cursed, and insulted over anything, or nothing, at any time. Every aspect of my life was attacked. Especially my family members, who treated my spouse very well.

After 6 years of intense therapy, most of the anger is gone now.

Obsessive behavior was another problem. We spent entire Saturday afternoons discussing why some high school friends said a certain thing. Over and over. We would regularly spend 30 minutes or more on the phone, while I was at work, discussing some obsession of hers. We've spent countless hours discussing strippers and prostitutes.

Sex has been almost non-existent. We tried the first few years. But she would end up attacking and insulting me. We haven't tried in many years. May not ever try again.

After her father passed away I almost had to move out. One night she threatened to kill me, and broke my car window as I was driving away.

We had a good financial cushion when getting married. But we almost went broke due to her excessive spending. The 6 years of therapy have helped her now to control this. But lots of arguments and tears to get there.

She can't travel anywhere overnight. This disruption is too much for her to handle. She becomes unstable. I can't travel overnight on my own. The last 2 times I did, she started to go out of her mind (literally - psychiatric medicines only work to a certain extent).

She can't interact with other people. She hasn't been to church in 5 years. We haven't gotten together with friends in 4 years. For a couple of years, she barely left the house on her own. If we run into a friend while at the grocery store, this can disturb her psychological condition.

She started using pornography shortly after we got married. This is still a problem.

I'm sure I've left out whole categories of stuff I've been through.

My life can never be the same. Even if all her problems go away completely, and years pass, I'll still have to wonder if they will come back.

Brett
October 6, 2008 10:09 AM

In a previous post, I concluded:

"If the answers to any of these are "yes", then don't walk away. Run away. As fast as you can."

I now realize this is harsh sounding, which was not my intention.

I would rewrite it as: If the answers to any of these are "yes", then understand that this person may behave very differently after marriage, as compared to before.

John in Indy
October 6, 2008 10:17 AM

I'm very sorry to hear about your wife, Brett, and glad to hear that things have improved from the lowest point. I think that your points #1 and #6 are common sense, but I don't think it follows that marrying someone who fits one of 2-5 will always lead to disaster. I think that's the problem with establishing hard-and-fast rules. Most people are intimately familiar with only their own marriages, and assign dos and don'ts accordingly. There are many happy, stable, productive people with a history of minor psychological treatment or instances of abuse or alcoholic parents on their resumes. There are many awful people without such backgrounds. I think these lists arise too much from people's own experiences, when everyone's experience is different. Marrying a good, stable, honest, caring person is important, but trite, arbitrary rules about dogs and tidiness do more harm than good. And even rules about the big things, like Brett's, are far from universally applicable. Not all abuse victims are created equal.

Brett
October 6, 2008 10:45 AM

John in Indy - thanks for the comments. I guess you can understand why I wrote my points 2 through 5.

I talked to my wife's therapist in private, and he said the psychiatric issue make her problems geometrically worse. If bad things had happened, but no psychiatric problems arose, then it wouldn't be anywhere near as bad.

Through modern medicine (like Zyprexa) people who would be totally unable to function, are able to function as well as anyone else.

This was my wife's case. With proper medication, you'd never know anything was wrong. Without it, she would have to be institutionalized.

Getting married shook up her system enough, that the underlying psychological problems burst through. No amount of medication can push them back down.

So I guess you can imagine my shock and anger when I married someone, and their behavior changed so much, so fast, and for so long.

She did tell me before marriage, about the psychiatric condition and medication. It didn't mean anything to me - I assumed if someone behaved a certain way today, they would be basically the same a year from now, etc. She said she had no idea that things would change so much.

Bugg
October 6, 2008 10:46 AM

I have violated many of the sillier rules here, thugh i don't feel compelled to elaborate.

Boil it down to some simple ones about a potential spouse-

Does the person have a good heart?

Can this person love children?

Is this person honest?

carly
October 6, 2008 11:12 AM

Brett-this may be too personal a question, but why did you stay with her? I wouldn't walk away myself without giving it my best for a year or two, but if she's not even sleeping with you, it does look like she still has a long way to go, and it looks to me that there's no guarantee of further improvement. I don't wish to sound crass, but after 8 years, nobody would blame you for looking to your own needs.

pentamom
October 6, 2008 11:20 AM

Some of those are good common sense, some are insightful, and some are just stupid. The ones about dogs, for example -- one of the best husbands and fathers I've ever known is not a "dog person," and I don't think he was taken by surprise when he found he loved his children. Some people (self included) just don't relate to dogs well. It doesn't mean we're not fun-loving, it doesn't mean we don't find enjoyment in romping with less-rational creatures; it means there's something about dogs we don't connect with. And yeah, I like cats. I'm not Jane Wyman. Deal.

The one about the junk cars and the mudslide rubbed me the wrong way as well. I guess that's because I'm married to an excellent man who just isn't a hands-on, "Git 'er done" kind of guy. That doesn't mean he doesn't take care of his family well, that doesn't mean he's not good at things that matter as a husband, father and provider. Mostly it means that his father became ill and died before he had a chance to pass on a lot of that "guy knowledge" that develops that kind of mentality into a useful skill.

And the fourth-grade yearbook? Come on, [i]I[/i] don't even have an interest in what I did in fourth grade and who I sat next to. That doesn't mean I don't care about where I came from. For some people, that might matter. For others, it's a non-issue. Some of these are a lot more about what Anthony Esolen cares about, or what his wife cares about, as matters of personal taste, than about universals.

But some of them were great. The one about not marrying a scoffer -- well, that's straight out of the Psalms. Ditto the ones about treating female relatives well, thinking ill of typical male interests, and public belittling.

Anglican
October 6, 2008 11:22 AM

1.)Never date or marry a women whose favorite t.v. show is Sex and the City.
2.) Don't or marry anybody who doesn't read.
3.)I like his point on women who are exercise freaks and can't handle the though of getting fat,he is right on in what he says.
4.) Be very wary of people,male or female who don't like kids,many times they are either selfish or mentally ill.

Random Good things.
1.) Someone who can laugh at themselves.
2.)Somebody how can just as happy at home,watching movies,as going out on some expense night out.
3.) Religious faith is good unless,they are the kind of Christian who reads Joel Osteen books and watches T.V. preachers with more than mocking irony.Also, New Agers are not so great.
4.) People who don't lie are worthwhile,while those who do,you run fast and don't look back.

AnotherBeliever
October 6, 2008 12:33 PM

Wow, Brett, you are in the battle of a lifetime. I certainly hope that things will get better. As you said, you will never be 100% sure that things can stay better even if they do improve, but I also imagine you would be a hell of a lot more at peace if she could got out casually and be okay with you being gone overnight now and then.

My mother has a few of these issues, though by no means to the same extent. She is able to work and has friends and has no trouble going to social events and church. She is not obsessive, but there is some measure of paranoia, and a lot of anxiety and anger. They tried her on a few psychotropics, to say that did not end well is a bit of an understatement. It's come to light recently that she may have had mild traumatic brain injury as a child, and it's rather hard to unravel how much of what she's dealing with is that, and how much is genetic. She does not want to pursue final consult with a neurologist because she is scared, so me and my brother are just left wondering. We intend to care for her ourselves in her old age if at all feasible, being good traditional Hispanics (even if we are ethnically mixed) who value precious few things more than family ties. But we are also aware it could come at a heavy cost if things do not go well. There is also my youngest brother to be concerned about. He is still school aged and living with her. It would be nice to have a bit of a road map so we could plan accordingly, but these things are uncertain, like life itself.

I'm praying for you, Brett. I hope you have some support on your end.

pentamom
October 6, 2008 12:35 PM

On second thought, Esolen's list is good as a thought-provoker. There's nothing in the list that I can say is objectively bad, just that some of it is too specific and rules out people on what might be spurious grounds, depending on circumstances.

So probably, everybody seeking a spouse or watching their offspring do it should read through this list and think through what Esolen's saying, but nobody should use it as an actual checklist, ruling people in or out item by item.

David J. White
October 6, 2008 2:36 PM

If anything, you should be suspicious of a man whose friends are principally female. The men may be avoiding him, and there is a reason for that.

Sheesh, except for a few very close male friends, most of my friends are female. It's not so much that men are avoiding me (so far as I know), but that I am avoiding them. In my experience, when groups of men get together they tend to talk about a) sports, and/or b) cars, both of which bore me to tears. I enjoy having friends I can really *talk* to, and, sorry to say, but on the whole women are better at that.

Having said that, I have generally preferred to date (and have had more successful relationships with) women who have more male friends than female friends. I don't have a gang of male friends, and I prefer women who don't have a gaggle of female friends.

But, then, I've never been married or even come close, and at this point I doubt I ever will.

JM
October 6, 2008 3:31 PM

Brett, while I am truly sorry for the troubles you've experienced, please understand that your list is pretty offensive; just because someone has been abused does not mean that they're guaranteed to evolve into someone who has multiple psychiatric issues or who will make someone else's life hell. There are more variables involved than just the abuse, including other events in one's life, genetic predisposition to mental illness, etc.

That mentality is PRECISELY the reason why I don't talk to anyone up front about my childhood. It's too easy for people to jump to the conclusion that I'm damaged, that I am unstable, or that I'm emotionally fragile. I'm none of those things - I'm more even-keeled and resiliant than a lot of folks, and while the abuse was, yes, damaging at one point, time, distance, and (most importantly) the good Lord managed to effect a whole lot of healing.

Furthermore, to make the assumption that you need to run from someone who's been abused just adds insult to injury in the most painful way -- it implies that person is not worthy of love or a healthy relationship. If it didn't work out for YOU, recognize that 'you' are not 'everyone'.

Anyway, on to the original list:

Some of it was funny and spot on, but some of those items weren't what I'd call diehard truths. I know plenty of men who have or love dogs, for instance, who should never, ever become fathers. And plenty of tidy men who are manly. Etc. But I think the larger truths behind the snark are pretty much spot on -- people who take themselves too seriously, who are irresponsible, who can't relax, etc -- probably will make a relationship harder work than it needs to be.

MJ
October 6, 2008 4:22 PM

I won't even bother reading this list, as the snippet Rod posted sounds stupid and every list I've ever read like this has been just as dumb.

From being badly burned, my rule is similar to what a few people above have said: problems that are unsolved pre-marriage will not be solved after. Most likely they will get worse. My only rule? Trust your instincts. Keep in mind that you may have children with this person, and if your worst suspicions come true, you will be visiting this awfulness on your own flesh and blood. Trust me -- nothing is worse.

MJ

sigaliris
October 6, 2008 6:35 PM

Hey there, r-e-P! It seems we have similar acumen in selecting a mate. ; ) Mine is similar, though he didn't get his tattoo until quite awhile after we'd wed.

My rule number one would be, don't marry a man who writes for Touchstone. But I suppose that's one of those things one couldn't predict until it was too late. I don't think I'd have married any man who wrote for a conservative publication. That would have seemed far too incestuous, rather like being married off to one's father's uncle's second cousin in settlement of some feud among the legendarily bloodthirsty tribes of Konservistan.

Seriously, I don't think any human relationship should be based on a checklist. If I ever found I was being evaluated according to a checklist, I believe the evening would end with my invitation to the idiot to "check off THIS!" How rude and demeaning. My advice would be, never marry anyone who doesn't make your heart sing, and never marry anyone who doesn't consider him or herself the luckiest man/woman in the world to have found you. When hard times come, and they will, the knowledge that you got into this via the truest love you've ever known will help you get through them.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.