Crunchy Con

Austerity Britain and us

Tuesday October 21, 2008

Categories: Britain, Culture, Economics
Credit-crunched Britain experiences the hangover from its long party. Excerpt: Buoyed by easy credit and inflated property prices, the British public spent itself into debt, a total of $2.49 trillion of it. The average British household now owes $102,000, including...
Advertisement
Comments
MH
October 21, 2008 10:18 AM

My big fear is that the government will print the money to meet its entitlement obligations and inflate away its debt at the same time.

As a saver this means I will be up the creek along people who didn't acts as responsibly.

Scotch Meg
October 21, 2008 10:23 AM

The lack of sustaining entitlements is already real. And advance planning for retirement can be impacted by many events, not just the current crisis.

I am looking at taking in both of my aging parents, who are divorced but may end their lives together anyway. One sister is limited by a mental illness and the other is mourning the loss of a son. The latter wants my mother around, but not in her home. My half-brother and half-sister are of an age with my children and won't be able to help support our father for some time, if ever, during his lifetime.

Fortunately for my parents, I am a Christian. I say fortunately, because the home environment they created was not of a sort to create an intrinsic gratitude -- it is only through my faith that I have learned to appreciate my duty toward them. So, despite what we expect will be extremely deleterious effects on our family -- due to disparate values and self-centeredness, not to financial considerations (although those will, of course, also affect us) -- we will take them in when (not if) they get to the point where they are willing to admit that they need us to shelter and care for them. And hopefully, we can help them feel satisfied with their lot and welcome in our home. My husband, God bless him, long ago taught me to accept cheerfully and with grace what one must do, rather than whining about it.

My prayer is that all those aging boomers will have someone in their lives who is willing to take them in, whether a blood relative or not. It's not about what they deserve for the way they have lived, but what they deserve as human beings who reflect the image of God.

ctb
October 21, 2008 11:04 AM

I sense there is a general recognition that we need to act more responsibly and there is evidence that people are doing with less. But my frugality means that my neighbor may lose his job. Now he has to be really frugal so two more neighbors lose their job. None them can now contribute to either the savings rate or be taxed to retire the national debt, in fact they need to be taken care of.

Can this kind of collapse be avoided? How can a society be conservative in its use of resources and still provide full employment?

Has anyone written of this? Are there any answers?

Baton Rouge Reader
October 21, 2008 11:18 AM

I was both intrigued and encouraged to see Professor Lawler recommend smoking and child-bearing as antidotes to our present crisis...

Chris
October 21, 2008 12:00 PM

Clearly y'all don't understand how Bush/Cheney is saving America from Socialism.

The Bush/Cheney administration intended, by design, to leave the government so debt-ridden that it could not afford to carry out its entitlement obligations. That's why "deficits don't matter" (Cheney) and the Social Security Trust Fund was dismissed as "... just IOUs that I saw firsthand.” (Bush). Medicare D doesn't matter, because there's no intent to fulfill long-term obligations. Piling a huge new entitlement upon the old just speeds the total collapse of what Bush called the "house of cards."

Or was that our economy he called a "house of cards?"

For the first time in American history we had a president and his party insist on large tax cuts during wartime, "nothing is more important" they proclaimed. This, too, was part of the plan. The larger the debt, the less we can afford entitlements. They wrecked the economy in the process, but at least the evil government won't be able to send money to the elderly. The Weathermen only dreamed of doing such damage to America.

elizabeth
October 21, 2008 1:17 PM

People are already figuring out that a return to multi-generational households is in the cards. Over 3/4 of 2008 college graduates moved back in with the parents-- a matter of the parents extending their duty toward their children. This is no surprise to us, as rents in our neighborhood are running almost three times our mortgage payment (we bought in '87). Those of us who paid as we went and will be retiring mortgages in the near future may be able to leave houses to our kids, if they are willing to live with us for the duration.

My mother and siblings lived with extended family for much of their childhood. No reason we can't do that again. It's going to mean plenty of empty starter mansions in exurbia, though. Maybe we should consider returning those areas to huge shared gardens?

Old Susan
October 21, 2008 1:40 PM

My prayer is that all those aging boomers will have someone in their lives who is willing to take them in, whether a blood relative or not. It's not about what they deserve for the way they have lived, but what they deserve as human beings who reflect the image of God.

Well, that's nice of you, Meg, but pretty broad. And pretty condescending.

I'm not a boomer, being one year too old, but I don't see that "the way I've lived" merits anything less than support. After all, we've been there for you-all, in case you haven't noticed.

We've been married 42 years. We have four children, all adults now. One is seriously mentally ill, and we've been there for him. I shouldn't need to go into detail on that, but if you think that's been easy, you don't know much about it. One younger child cratered emotionally, and she moved in with us for two years after finishing her (very expensive) college education, all paid for by us, by the way. In fact, all college educations were fully paid for by us, no grants, and no one had to borrow a penny. That wasn't always easy, by the way. We didn't inherit money. It didn't fall out of the sky. We worked hard for it.

We lent our eldest money so he could buy a house. I do childcare for grandchildren.

So what exactly is it that I've done, in your estimation "not to deserve" help if I need it? What is this, all help is a one-way street? Your generation takes easily enough, I have noticed that part, but giving is something extraordinary?

If you don't get along with your parents, that's between you and them. But let's not broaden the brush on that, OK?

Maria
October 21, 2008 1:58 PM

This is not only in Britain, russians around are also getting inspired to live in credit. Two hours ago russian central TV channel stopped me on Tverskaya (that is russian Broadway) and tried to make an interview about hypothec. Correspondents and big cameras are scary to me so i pretended not to know what was hypothec, but they didn't allow to escape, they explained patiently and filmed my reaction. I believe it will not be ever shown because i expressed full contempt.When they asked if my family was going to buy new apartments using hypothec I replied we don't need such a thing because we have a roof over our heads.Couldn't find right words and felt like a fool. Perhaps that is soviet upbringing imprinted on me stronger than on others. People buy flats and cars in credit -I wouldn't feel at home in a flat being indebted for it. The same with car. Good cars cost 15-20.000$ For me it is better to spend whole year on nothing but bread and kefir to buy it in ordinary way rather than get it at once in credit (although i believe no car is worth of fasting, even beautiful red Mazda6)

Scott Walker
October 21, 2008 2:25 PM

You do well, Maria, to be skeptical about easy credit. The same greedheads that have gutted America are always looking for new fools, er, customers to buy their innovative financial products, especially now that Americans are about tapped out. As our once-prosperous nation is rapidly transforming into a smoking crater of debt, the wonderful folks who brought us this exciting new world would be delighted to offer Russians the same opportunities.

Connie Connie in Wisconsin
October 21, 2008 3:46 PM

Susan, you are too hard on Meg. Obviously she is a saint for being willing, nay, EAGER, to take in her undeserving DIVORCED parents.

elizabeth
October 21, 2008 3:48 PM

Home values are crashing around us. Houses that would have been snapped up even two years ago have been sitting empty for over a year. We're seeing lovely old houses priced in the $40-70,000 range in some neighborhoods. If I had a penny to spare, I'd buy one and rent it out.

It is interesting that the financial services industry has invented 40 and 50-year mortgages, too. I hope people expect to stay in one house for life, like we have. How many years would it take to have any reasonable amount of equity?

Old Susan
October 21, 2008 4:06 PM

Ah yes, Connie, certainly, anyone who divorces for any reason whatever is thereby rendered undeserving.

I obviously don't know any of these people. I do know that they raised a mentally ill daughter; and I know that another daughter thinks they are "self-centered." Meg may well be right about them.

I would note, though, that most saints are canonized by other people, not by themselves.

Mostly I resent being lumped in with these people on the basis of my age. These folks are unworthy, and so I am unworthy, get it? All us boomers are bad people. We can only hope our children are all saints if we need help.

If Meg was my daughter, and I knew her real views about me, I'd rather live in a cardboard box in the gutter than to live with her. Just my opinion. Living is about more than having a roof over your head.

Scotch Meg
October 21, 2008 4:36 PM

Susan,

I am sorry I offended you. As I pointed out, one of my sisters has mental disabilities and the other is seriously depressed due to a tragic loss. It sounds as though you have done everything your children needed and well deserve help and support from them. That's not my situation. My parents helped me with college and I'm grateful to them for that -- but my sisters didn't receive their diplomas until many years after they completed their degrees, because my (divorcing) parents couldn't get their act together to pay their share (we all worked and borrowed for college as well). My mother drinks and my father carouses. I certainly have no claim to being a saint; it's very difficult for me to deal with my parents, and I'm sure I could do a better job. BUT I mail my mother money for food every month (in gift card form so it goes for food and not anything else, such as alcohol). I gave my dad his rent money a month ago because he owes money to the IRS and they finally got impatient and confiscated his bank account. When my parents move in with me, I expect to be dealing with all sorts of bad examples for my kids, including incorrect -- from my point of view -- answers to my kids' questions, delivered without shame or consideration for the values my husband and I are trying to teach. I am constantly walking the line between enabling and caring for them.

By boomers I am including myself. I meant more my peers than our parents' generation, as a general rule. I meant to state that all boomers (and other generations, as well) deserve help in old age, regardless of whether or not they have lived good lives! I am truly sorry that you misunderstood me so completely.

Old Susan
October 21, 2008 5:02 PM

Hiya Meg, let me give you a piece of advice.

First, sorry I took all this personally. My fault. It has nothing to do with me. I see that.

I've never met either you or your parents, so I have no idea, really, what the situation may be. I've heard your side now, but 30+ years of law practice has taught me, sometimes the hard way, that there is always another side to the story.

My parents, both dead now, were both alcoholics, so I have some personal experience with addiction, enabling, acting out, all that jazz. By the way.

Whatever. Moving right along. My advice to you, based solely on what you've posted here, which is of course all I know, is to avoid moving these people into your home at all costs. There is rent in this world, and there are places to rent. There is public assistance for people who do not have assets, and I'd encourage you to explore that.

You are very very angry. Your anger shines through every word you say.

Doubtless, from what I can tell, you've got good reasons. Whatever. Or not. Irrelevant. There it is. Maybe no one should be angry. Maybe we should all be able to flap our arms and fly. Whatever. We have to deal with reality, not with pious fantasies. If there is any way at all to avoid moving all this anger into your home, do it. Even if it's more expensive financially.

You don't need this in your life. You have children of your own, who are properly your first responsibility. You are your first responsibility. Your own marriage is your first responsibility. Don't do this to the rest of your family, don't do it to yourself. Figure out something else.

stari_momak
October 21, 2008 7:55 PM

And to support that lifestyle they allowed the migraton of millions of non-Europeans. Granted they had some before, but it accelerated in the 1990s under Blair (lefties love immigration, its their best electoral weapon). Now London is less than half indigeneous British, probably less than half European. The Tube is creaky and dirty. The whole city and Island is crowded. Its awful

Alicia
October 22, 2008 10:15 AM

Hi, Scotch Meg.

Caring for an aging parent or for two aging parents who don't like each other, is a tremendous repsonsibility. There is no way to know in advance whether you are up to it except to trust what you know about yourself.

I could never live with my mother - I'd commit matricide if I did (I'm almost kidding). Whatever you decide, Scotch Meg, you have my good thoughts, but please don't allow the irresponsibility of other siblings to push you into turning your household upside down and making a decision you will regret.

elizabeth
October 22, 2008 12:16 PM

Scotch Meg,

What Old Susan said. My 75-year-old mom has a personality disorder. I will do whatever I have to do to see that she remains housed, short of letting her live with me. Her behavior is very similar to that of an active alcoholic - hostile, paranoid, no boundaries, etc.

Your children do not deserve the chaos that will ensue if you bring your destructive parents into your home. There are other ways to honor the parents without disrupting your home life. You may be responding to the codependent tug that all children of alcoholics feel. Pray hard for discernment before you let them in.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.