Crunchy Con

Fukuyama: Obamacon

Thursday October 30, 2008

Categories: Conservatism, Democrats

If a conservative were to vote for Obama, Frank Fukuyama gives the best reason in his American Conservative piece. Excerpt:

I'm voting for Barack Obama this November for a very simple reason. It is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of George W. Bush. It was bad enough that he launched an unnecessary war and undermined the standing of the United States throughout the world in his first term. But in the waning days of his administration, he is presiding over a collapse of the American financial system and broader economy that will have consequences for years to come. As a general rule, democracies don't work well if voters do not hold political parties accountable for failure. While John McCain is trying desperately to pretend that he never had anything to do with the Republican Party, I think it would a travesty to reward the Republicans for failure on such a grand scale.

McCain's appeal was always that he could think for himself, but as the campaign has progressed, he has seemed simply erratic and hotheaded. His choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate was highly irresponsible; we have suffered under the current president who entered office without much knowledge of the world and was easily captured by the wrong advisers. McCain's lurching from Reaganite free- marketer to populist tribune makes one wonder whether he has any underlying principles at all.

The whole AmCon symposium is well worth reading.

Advertisement
Comments
The Man From K Street
October 31, 2008 2:11 PM

It is hard to imagine a more disastrous presidency than that of George W. Bush.

James Buchanan? Franklin Pierce?

Reaganite in NY'C
October 31, 2008 2:16 PM

The Man from K Street:

Many, many thanks for your delightful skewering of Lincoln Chaffee, Scott McClennan, Susan Eisenhower, et. al. Good riddance!

Z
October 31, 2008 3:13 PM

Thank you for answering, Rob G.

Alicia
October 31, 2008 3:24 PM

Man from K Street, your responses to the list of conservatives backing Obama sound to me like classic "Yes, but..." responses. I get the sense that you would have the same response no matter how long the list of Obamacons got to be...

Sheree
October 31, 2008 9:40 PM

I will concede the Buchanan and Pierce were ineffective and, for practical purposes, historical footnotes.

GWB is no footnote. His policies are real disasters and I can only pray we are able to recover from them.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.