My Dallas Morning News column this week reflects my disgust with both political parties, and my inclination to withhold my vote this year. Last night we had some conservative friends over, and we all seemed to conclude that writing in Ron Paul (can you write in anybody in Texas) might not be the worst idea this miserable year.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
EricW, do you only read magazines that you know in advance will agree with your perspective? How boring that must be.
Christopher Buckley has endorsed Obama!
Alicia (AKA "Your Name"):
To answer your question:
No, I have other ways to bore myself - like answering annoying questions.
Congratulations, Rod. I ended up the same place as you, for many of the same reasons. A plague on both their houses, Republican & Democratic alike. Writing in Ron Paul for President is not a bad idea. However, Ron Paul has caused his name to be taken off of the Montana general election ballot, and has thereby indicated that he does not really want people to vote for him for President for the general election. I am writing in Joe Schriner. He is consistent life, namely, he is pro-life, anti-war & anti-death penalty. Look him up and consider him. His website is at http://voteforjoe.com .
What if Berg is right - i.e., that Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen?
youtube.com/watch?v=gA6_k3NtXZs
Conspiracy theory? Whacky idea? You decide.
EricW, I decide that you have shit for brains.
not a wacko:
I'm rubber, you're glue.
Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks on you.
Someone didn't get enough home trainin', it seems.
Have a nice day.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.