Crunchy Con

Losing Bill Buckley's religion

Sunday October 26, 2008

From a NYT Magazine interview with Christopher Buckley:


As an only child, did you find one of your parents easier to talk to than the other? My mother. She got it. He often didn't get it.

What didn't he get? Religion.

He was a practicing Catholic. What are you? I am post-Catholic.

As opposed to a lapsed Catholic? I am probably more of a collapsed Catholic.

Do you believe in the afterlife? Alas, no. But I find myself wondering at the oddest times: So, Pup, are you in heaven? Is it true after all? If he is there, I hope he is debating with St. Peter about letting me in when my time comes, and I hope he is winning.

I hope so too. I find this so touching and sad. I worry from time to time about my children losing their faith. I would consider that just about the worst thing that could happen to them.

That his son had lost his faith must have been a terrible burden for a Christian like Bill Buckley to bear -- especially because his wife, by their son's testimony, had no faith either. I wonder if she ever did. I couldn't imagine going through life married to someone who had no faith, or who didn't share my faith. Before I met Julie, I once had a mad crush on a Jewish girl in my office. She was smart, lively, funny, beautiful, and interested in me. But she didn't have faith, and even if she had, it wouldn't have been my faith, nor mine hers, obviously. My faith is the most important thing to me; it defines who I am. I couldn't have entered into that loneliness within a marriage, nor put her into that loneliness, to say nothing of confusing our children. I read somewhere not long ago that children of mixed-faith marriages are disproportionately likely to become adults who have no faith. I believe it.

Understand, I'm not saying it's impossible to have a loving marriage without a shared faith. Pat and Bill Buckley disprove that thesis, and I personally know at least one other example. Nor, I hope it's obvious, am I saying that a father and son cannot love each other if one believes in God and the other doesn't. I would love my adult children not one speck less if any were to become atheists; in fact, there's a part of me that would actively love them more, because I would worry so much about them, and want them to know and to love and to serve God. Still, reading that part of the Chris Buckley interview made me sad for him and for his sweet and noble father, who, I hope, is able now to intercede for divine mercy on us all, especially those who struggle to see more clearly through this darkened glass of mortality.

Advertisement
Comments
Max Schadenfreude
October 27, 2008 9:14 PM

Oh, I'm laughing a many posts.

Insane Kitten
October 27, 2008 10:44 PM

Laugh it up, fuzzball.

Jim H
October 28, 2008 7:46 AM

Eddie, My prayers for you.

Alicia
October 28, 2008 9:52 AM

Hi, MH. That's a dilemma, if you don't want to pretend to your children to something you don't feel. I'm also more or less an agnostic, but I am fascinated by religion.

Perhaps sharing your own journey with them in an age appropriate way and teaching them about religion, giving them the opportunity to visit churches of different faiths if they want to, allowing them to attend Sunday School (or Hebrew School or classes at their local mosque) if they want to. If you have friends who are religious, attending their church or temple or mosque with them occasionally. Encouraging your children to take religion classes when they go to college.

For me it comes down to talking about your own choices with them, and the journey you are on, and encouraging them to have open minds. Good luck whatever you decide.

MargaretE
October 28, 2008 10:13 AM

I finally just read the actual NYT magazine interview with Christo Buckley. I enjoy his novels – they're hilarious and fun – but I agree with his own take that he's not a political thinker... or "even much of a thinker." He doesn't seem to ponder the big questions as deeply as his dad did, and I definitely don't see the same sort of humility, or love of humanity, that permeated so much of the elder Buckley's writings. Christo seems to be all about the clever quip and the satirical jab, and he does it very well, but that seems to be the extent of his vision. WFB had a great intellect AND a great heart. I find it ironic that Christo says his father "didn't get" religion. From what I can gather of both men, it seems to be the son who doesn't get it.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.