Crunchy Con

Pessimists vindicated! Bwahahaha!

Wednesday October 15, 2008

Categories: Decline and fall

drsmith.jpgJames Wolcott observes that the Chicken Littles are turning out to be, you know, right. Excerpt (and I'm sorry to tell you that the new, improved Movable Type apparently doesn't accept blockquote HTML):

Rooster-crowing optimists contend the media have a sullen disposition to make things look grimmer than they are, harping on the negative while downplaying the underlying positives. The problem with this argument is that in recent years the reality has often proved to be worse than anticipated. Wall Street's idea of a passing storm ended up being a tsunami of pandemic proportion. It was the sunshine salesmen such as Gramm, Steve Forbes, the Fox business-news claque, CNBC host Larry Kudlow, and the editorialists at Investor's Business Daily who helped suck us into this economic mess with their happy talk of "the Goldilocks economy" and the Bush boom as "the greatest story never told," while the forecasts of the naysayers, gloomy prophets, storm-cloud watchers, and motorcycle wraiths from hell went unheeded until it was too late and the subprime contagion took down Bear Stearns, threatening to tumble the entire lending system off the ledge. The alarmists may not have gotten every particular right, but they nailed the big picture with Paul Revere gusto. Among those vindicated: Nouriel Roubini, an economics professor and market observer who earned the title "Dr. Doom" (formerly held by Henry Kaufman) for dire predictions of the credit crisis that panned out with a vengeance. "Over the past year, whenever optimists have declared the worst of the economic crisis behind us," Stephen Mihm wrote in a New York Times Magazine profile, "Roubini has countered with steadfast pessimism. In February, when the conventional wisdom held that the venerable investment firms of Wall Street would weather the crisis, Roubini warned that one or more of them would go 'belly up'--and six weeks later, Bear Stearns collapsed."

Similarly, it was the "Peak Oil" theorists who warned of spiking oil prices and strains on the refinery system, only to be dismissed as amateur nerds and tinfoil-hat chiliasts--until $4-a-gallon gas and winter heating bills brought the new reality home. It was James Howard Kunstler, the author of The End of Suburbia and The Long Emergency, who warned with scourging wit and rococo imagery in his weekly online column that high gas prices, suburban sprawl, decaying infrastructure, the machinations of hedge-fund greedheads, and Wall Street necromancy were converging into a Hurricane Katrina-size "clusterf**k" that would deform the social and political landscape. In his August 25 column, Kunstler wrote, "I'm rather convinced that the carnage on the money scene will be so extreme this fall that the nation will seem to have been transformed from a superpower to a basketcase before November 4th, and that the blame for this state of affairs will be blindingly obvious: the people in charge for the past eight years looted the treasury, destroyed the currency, and left the machinery of capital a smoking wreckage."

Within a month, the carnage Kunstler envisioned not only got worse but gained velocity as mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae required an emergency federal bailout, fabled Merrill Lynch disappeared into the maw of Bank of America, Lehman Brothers went belly-up, A.I.G. was rescued, and the Dow lost 500 points in one day, the worst loss since 2001. Billions of dollars of bad loans devoured by boll weevils, thousands of well-paying jobs liquidated in a single stroke, stock portfolios turning into scarecrows before one's eyes, and who knew what awaited over the next hill?

Advertisement
Comments
Derek Copold
October 15, 2008 1:17 PM

However, there are people on the left who thought we couldn't 'win' in Iraq, (Me included) that the violence would never decrease..and it actually has.

I wouldn't give up this argument so quickly.

How do you define "win", here? In relation to 2006, yes, the violence has dropped in Iraq. In relation to 2003, not so much. Too, the idea of changing the regime was to allow for a pro-U.S. democracy to take root in a secular, multi-ethnic, multi-sectarian Iraq. Instead, we have a partitioned polity dominated by pro-Iranian, religious parties. This after a year or so of civil war and ethnic cleansing.

Did we defeat Al Qaeda? Yes, but they weren't there until we got there, and then we won by bribing the Sunnis who had been shooting at us before. Sure, it's a "win", in the sense that stopping the bleeding from an self-amputated limb is a "win", but I don't think we can survive too many of these sorts of wins.

Does anyone have a good example of the left doing so? (And, no, any morality claim is an opinion.

The Welfare Reform battle comes to mind, and many on the left are still trying to undo it. The left's push to get amnesty for illegal immigrants before enforcement is an example (shared by CoC Republicans) despite the empirical example of the 1986 failure. Both the left and the right want to push NATO further and further east, even though that's obviously going to get us into another Cold War.

Part of the problem is that both sides have their weak points, and these points become visible only after having been in power for so many years. 20 years ago the left looked foolish because its orthodoxies were defunct. It's happening to the right now (though, I'd argue it's really the neocon right, more than anything, as these failures were predicted by paleocons in places like TAC).

...but that's really the exception that proves the rule, as Clinton was part of the DLC, the fiscally conservative arm of the Democrats.

That group does not include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Chris Dodd and Charles Schumer, who were all styming efforts to regulate the GSE's. If pushing mortgages on people with no serious hope of repaying them isn't reality-denial, I don't know what is.

Scott Walker
October 15, 2008 1:41 PM

Reading Wolcott makes me wonder how the poor lad would have dealt with the authentic hard times that have been the lot of all of humanity for all but a few brief years of our history. If he gets the vapors over the likes of George W Bush, one can only imagine how he would cope with the Black Death or an invasion by the Huns. Hothouse flowers generally die in a natural environment.

JPL
October 15, 2008 3:13 PM

10 points for the Dr. Zachary Smith reference...

Oskar Chomicki
October 15, 2008 5:07 PM

I think Rod has the correct read on this situation. I see most in the comments section separating into left and right, but it's clear both parties are to blame for this mess. The fact is no politician (Ron Paul excepted) really dissented from the orthodoxy that abundant credit was essential to greasing the wheels of the economy.

Whether we got that credit through GSEs, lowering the Fed prime rate, or relying on China and Japan to buy up our debt, both parties were culpable. The blame game is an absurd one to play. We have a broken system and no one (including the electorate) wants to make the sacrifices required to fix it.

One thing I know I'll never fall for again is when "experts" talk about the economy entering a "new paradigm." The fact is that you can't create wealth from thin air, yet our supposed best minds pretended for years that we could. Whether the forced and unwilling adjustment of our economy to a more balanced model will take the form of a Great Depression is something I would hesitate to predict, but it will be painful to many. Or we could just inflate another bubble with cheap credit and find ourselves in a similar situation ten years down the line. The difference is that the rest of the world may not want to or be able to help us in this regard.

Alicia
October 16, 2008 2:01 PM

Hi, JPL. Originally, I believe Dr. Smith was supposed to be the villain (he worked for the Russians and he was the reason the Robinsons were "Lost in Space") but Jonathan Harris was so funny as Smith that he became the comic relief.

Favorite moment when some sort of space siren called out to Smith in a falsetto voice, "Smithhhhhhhh, Smithhhhh, whoooohooo." Good times.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.