My cover story from this past Sunday's DMN opinion section is about how Wendell Berry's agrarianism makes sense in this moment in our political, economic and cultural history. It's Wendell 101 for those who know anything about Berry, but if you don't, this might serve as a good introduction.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Wendell Berry is one author, one topic, where I'm in complete agreement with Rod Dreher - and that doesn't happen very often. It seems inescapable to me that the double-whammy of oil depletion and hyper-inflation will eventually - in a decade or two - force many of us to return to agrarian lifestyles or starve.
And now that the GOP has made fear of socialism, and its relatives Marxism and Communism, a central part of its campaign rhetoric, I wonder who will start pointing out the similarities between Berry's agrarianism and Marxism.
Has Berry ever weighed in on Karl Marx? Berry's connections to Wes Jackson and the Land Institute link him to writers like the LI's Stan Cox, who has written quite a bit about Marxism, agrarianism about the evils of capitalism.
I'm not defending Karl Marx, or his theories, or the notable failed experiments with Marxism and Communism. But with 'pure' capitalism tanking in a big way, and with oil depletion forcing us to question the viability of 1000 mile salads, it's high time we started thinking about how our grandkids are going to feed themselves. Without diesel-powered tractors and combines, agriculture should naturally return to human and animal power to till the soil and harvest the crops. With a worthless currency, workers will turn to other means to barter for essentials.
Again, with capitalism failing in such spectacular ways, it's not surprising that socialism and agrarianism are getting more airplay.
Great article, Mr. Dreher.
I hope many people read it, and as a 'liberal/progressive' I'm a huge admirer of both Wendell Barry and also of Andrew Bacevitch.
Humility, a sense of place, and a new focus on stewardship are much needed.
Clearly, the arrogance of 'no regulations and no limits' didn't turn out well.
I just don't see how we would give up the efficiency gains of mechanization and large scale farming operations. If farmers currently pay substandard wages to illegal workers, what is going to make them higher hundreds of American citizens at a living wage? Sorry but Americans aren't going to spend 10 hours a day picking berries because gas is expensive. Maybe 1% of the population shares your longing for an agrarian lifestyle.
I fear that instead of adjusting our lifestyles our more likely path would be to fight wars over limited resources. if we do realize an agrarian future it will be in the most post apocolyptic sense.
"I wonder who will start pointing out the similarities between Berry's agrarianism and Marxism."
The similarities between agrarianism and Marxism are purely superficial. What you really want to look at is something like distributism, which is pro-private property, but anti-big business and big government. Distributist ideas have been around since at least the beginning of the 20th century. A recent book which does a nice job of introducing this view is "Beyond Capitalism and Socialism," edited by Tobias Lanz.
You miss the point. its not about being a luddite. its about making our "homes" -- the environment, the communities, families -- the priority in our lives and our governmental policies.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.