Crunchy Con

A tale of two abortion doctors

Sunday November 23, 2008

Categories: Abortion

Lesley Wojcik, a young Johns Hopkins medical student, was worried that there are fewer abortionists in America, so she got busy trying to show fellow med students how to perform abortions. That's where the papaya teach-in came in. Here's an excerpt from a Washington Post story:

It was Christina, the Students for Choice chapter president, who proposed holding a papaya workshop to expose more students to abortion. She'd heard about such a workshop at a national Students for Choice gathering. It was a hands-on opportunity for second-year medical students to learn how to perform an abortion, using a papaya as a stand-in for a woman's uterus. Lesley thought it was a great idea.

The women enlisted doctors, residents and nurses from Maryland and Johns Hopkins to run the workshop and e-mailed an invitation to all second-year students. They promised dinner, a sure bet to lure medical students. This time, if the dean knew about their plans, he didn't object. Soon the workshop, which could accommodate 20 students, had a waiting list -- and the women organizing it had a small firestorm on their hands.

In her e-mail, Christina had hoped to attract participants by suggesting that they'd have fun learning the procedure: "You'll get the opportunity to be shown how to use manual vacuum aspirators using papaya models (apparently papayas bear a striking resemblance to a uterus. Who knew?)" But some of the students who received the invitation didn't see it that way. "This is a serious matter," one told Christina. Those offended by her tone demanded to be dropped from any future Medical Students for Choice e-mails. After consulting a dean, the women didn't remove any names from their list, but they decided to word future missives more carefully.

On the day of the workshop, Christina wiped out the stock of papayas at a Whole Foods store. The man behind her at the checkout wanted to know what she was using them for.

A medical procedure, she told him.

Come on, tell me, he pushed. A suture?

Something like that, she said she responded. She was not about to get into an abortion discussion in the supermarket.

Bizarre as it might seem to perform an operation on a papaya, in medical school it isn't unusual. Fruit or other food is regularly used to describe things in obstetrics. A uterus holding an 8-week-old fetus is the size of a naval orange. After 12 weeks, it is more like a grapefruit. The uterus itself is shaped like, well, a papaya.

Lesley's eyes were drooping as she, Christina and Regina set out tortillas and taco fixings in a second-floor classroom and assembled papayas and abortion instruments at stations in a lab next door. Like the others, Lesley was recovering from a big test earlier in the week, but she also had overextended herself on the treadmill. Still, in a long-sleeve, black scoop-neck top, jeans, shiny black rain boots and a tan sweater vest tied lightly at her waist, she was a picture of elegance. Her chin-length blond-streaked hair was tied into a tiny pony tail, accenting her angular features.

"This is so cool," said Lesley, who believed she was doing something important to address the shortage of abortion doctors. After years of defending abortion rights, she would finally learn how the procedure is done.

Ten women and three men showed up for the workshop, fewer than the organizers had expected. After heaping their plates with food and chatting about the recent test, the students cleared the lab tables for the teaching doctor to lay out her equipment and pass around photocopies of her lecture slides. Her tray contained a pair of scissors with a sharp tooth on each end, for grasping body parts during surgery, called a tenaculum.

The doctor gave a short lecture on first-trimester abortions. Then she showed the students how to grip the papaya with the scissors to hold the angle of the "cervix" straight on. With one hand, the doctor demonstrated how to administer a local pain killer, at 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions. She picked up different sizes of dilators used to widen the cervix and advised against pushing them in too hard, because in a soft-skinned papaya, the dilators might come out the other side. In a woman, more pressure would be needed to slide the dilator past the cervix and into the cavity of the uterus.

The doctor next picked up the suction instrument, a manually operated vacuum suction syringe. It was attached to a cannula, or thin tube, that she inserted into the papaya. She rotated it around the fruit's cavity, pulling and pushing the syringe, suctioning the papaya's contents.

"This is the most important thing and the hardest to learn," the doctor said as she pulled out lots of seeds and juice, what in a real abortion she called the "products of conception," or POC. "You put the POC into a bowl, repeat if necessary, and examine them under a microscope to make sure you got everything," she advised.

There was silence as she passed around photos of a dish with a light under it from a real abortion. It contained something that looked like a cotton ball, a yolk sac, and some blood and tissue. It was hard to make out any parts of a fetus under 3 months old, which, she said, is when more than 90 percent of all abortions are performed.

"How do you know you are done?" a student asked.

When you do it often enough, the doctor replied, you'll notice a gritty feel as you are scraping the uterus. If not, there is another tool, a rod with a spoon, one side sharp as a knife, to scrape again.

Now it was the students' turn to try the procedure in the lab next door. Imagining herself working on a real woman, Lesley looked tentative as she pushed up her sleeves and reached for the razor-sharp tenaculum.

"This just seems so awful," she exclaimed as she tried to grab the papaya with it. "Do [patients] feel this?"

Her look turned to fright when the nurse practitioner at her station answered that they do.

Why not apply the local anesthetic before gripping the cervix with the sharp instrument? Lesley asked. The answer: A doctor needs something to hold the cervix steady to administer the drug.

Lesley offered Christina the suction instrument to try first, and Christina took it without hesitation. "You can feel once you get into the hollow part," Christina told Lesley.

When Lesley's turn came, she ignored the directions and numbed the papaya before using the scissors. Then she gripped the papaya with the scissors, dilated it with the instrument in her other hand, and suctioned it with the vacuum, twice bringing up lots of seeds and pulp. Finally she tried the curet, the spoon with one sharp side, and pulled out still more pulp.

"So," she asked the nurse, "did we not suction correctly, or is this a papaya issue?"

"It's the papaya," the nurse replied.

Meanwhile, on the same planet but in a different world, a Serbian doctor at the other end of his career comes to a different conclusion:

The Spanish daily "La Razon" has published an article on the pro-life conversion of a former "champion of abortion." Stojan Adasevic, who performed 48,000 abortions, sometimes up to 35 per day, is now the most important pro-life leader in Serbia, after 26 years as the most renowned abortion doctor in the country.

"The medical textbooks of the Communist regime said abortion was simply the removal of a blob of tissue," the newspaper reported. "Ultrasounds allowing the fetus to be seen did not arrive until the 80s, but they did not change his opinion. Nevertheless, he began to have nightmares."

In describing his conversion, Adasevic "dreamed about a beautiful field full of children and young people who were playing and laughing, from 4 to 24 years of age, but who ran away from him in fear. A man dressed in a black and white habit stared at him in silence. The dream was repeated each night and he would wake up in a cold sweat. One night he asked the man in black and white who he was. 'My name is Thomas Aquinas,' the man in his dream responded. Adasevic, educated in communist schools, had never heard of the Dominican genius saint. He didn't recognize the name"

"Why don't you ask me who these children are?" St. Thomas asked Adasevic in his dream.

"They are the ones you killed with your abortions,' St. Thomas told him.

"Adasevic awoke in amazement and decided not to perform any more abortions," the article stated.

"That same day a cousin came to the hospital with his four months-pregnant girlfriend, who wanted to get her ninth abortion--something quite frequent in the countries of the Soviet bloc. The doctor agreed. Instead of removing the fetus piece by piece, he decided to chop it up and remove it as a mass. However, the baby's heart came out still beating. Adasevic realized then that he had killed a human being,"

After this experience, Adasevic "told the hospital he would no longer perform abortions. Never before had a doctor in Communist Yugoslavia refused to do so. They cut his salary in half, fired his daughter from her job, and did not allow his son to enter the university."

After years of pressure and on the verge of giving up, he had another dream about St. Thomas.

"You are my good friend, keep going,' the man in black and white told him. Adasevic became involved in the pro-life movement and was able to get Yugoslav television to air the film 'The Silent Scream,' by Doctor Bernard Nathanson, two times."

Adasevic has told his story in magazines and newspapers throughout Eastern Europe. He has returned to the Orthodox faith of his childhood and has studied the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas.

"Influenced by Aristotle, Thomas wrote that human life begins forty days after fertilization," Adasevic wrote in one article. La Razon commented that Adasevic "suggests that perhaps the saint wanted to make amends for that error." Today the Serbian doctor continues to fight for the lives of the unborn.

You should read the WaPo story to see what becomes of Dr. Wojcik.

Advertisement
Comments
Your Name
November 25, 2008 7:38 AM

Ugh...up in the middle of the night...can't sleep...read this sad saga...

I had a wonderful family practice doctor care for me during my very difficult 4th pregnancy. I will never forget her listening for the heartbeat at 11 weeks and saying,"Come on,baby, where are you?" She left the military and established an abortion clinic in the N AK town I lived in at that time because she felt it was her duty to make abortion available to a large populace who had no access to it. Words fail me. I cannot describe the sense of shock and loss I felt knowing this lovely young woman who referred to my fetus as a baby was going to spend her life providng abortion.

This article has helped me understand the thought process she must have gone through. It doesn't make it any easier but it helps me understand what her motivation was. I guess she was really pro-choice, because she supported my choice to have the baby despite the horrible suffering I was going through. She never once suggested abortion to me. Probably she was judging her audience, knowing DH worked for the RCC.

I think, like gay marriage, abortion is here to stay and we need to do all we can to help reduce it, to help mothers who are deciding about it. To pray. Prayer is so powerful I am always reminded of this when I read stories of great saints like Seraphim and St. Terese, who did nothing but pray and look at how much they accomplished compared to the average believer!

rombald
November 25, 2008 8:00 AM

fbc: "Utter bunk. At the moment of conception the embryo has a distinct DNA which is human and which is different from both mother and father. It is at that moment a unique human being."

I'm picking hairs a bit, but that's not quite right. Until gastrulation, the embryo can still divide and thus develop into two or more foetuses, so it obviously cannot be viewed as a distinct individual, unless you argue that identical twins form a single individual.

The debate is not single-sided, between prolife and prochoice, as there is a range of points at which one could argue the foetus to be fully human:
1. Egg-sperm fusion
2. Implantation
3. Gastrulation (2-3 weeks)
4. Quickening (Aquinas' 40 days, or thereabouts)
5. When it is of recognisably human form
6. When it can feel pain
7. When survival is possible
8. Birth

Your name: "I think, like gay marriage, abortion is here to stay"

Why did you make that comment? Did you ignore Old Susan's ponts about abortion and gay marriage being separate issues? Don't you realise how much the linkage between prolife and other conservative-Christian issues repels humanitarians who have other views about sexuality, etc.?

Matt C
November 25, 2008 9:30 AM

This was a very weird piece. The author spends a lot of time highlighting the young doctor's inquisitive nature and thoughtfulness, then ends the article with "oh and she decided it's not for her..."

Well, what did she decide to do? That's such an important part of this conversation. How did the learning process affect her decision making, and where did she ultimately decide she would be better off?

The overall tone of the piece was rough. "count the parts..." is a phrase I will never forget. The role of medicine in abortion is indeed complex, and I feel for doctors on both sides of the spectrum. There is much we could learn from their perspective.

It was good to see that the hosptial turned away the woman with a 6-month old baby though. Obama would let her have the abortion if he had his weay...

Appalachian prof
November 25, 2008 9:56 AM

RJohnson: "I find it interesting that nobody has spoken to the rights of the mother to live, or the rights of the other children to keep their mother. How would you explain to the children that you could not allow the doctors to save their mommy's life?"

I don't know if this is in response to anything I wrote, but the point I was trying to make was that there are ways we can preserve the mother's life without aborting the baby. The baby might have to be removed, the baby might die, but without gruesome torture. Pregnancy and childbirth can be a terrible stress on a woman's body, as I know from hard experience. But I don't think at any point I meant to convey any sort of cavalier attitude regarding a mother's life. I am a mother, and I take my own self-preservation seriously, as I do not wish for my children to ever have the pain of losing me. As a Catholic, I have seen literature extolling mothers who willingly chose to sacrifice their own lives for their unborn children; I often think, what about their other children? Would I be capable of that? Would that be the right thing to do? Should mothers be exhorted to do so by the Church?

In the end, I feel I might answer no to all of these questions. I don’t think I’m capable of that. And while the Church is within its rights to uphold models of heroic sanctity, it needs to anticipate, and have a good answer for, the dark side of these matters, precisely, the fate of the children left behind. But in the end, my main point is that even when a mother chooses her own life over that of her unborn child’s, must that child suffer terrible agony? Can it not be extracted humanely?

Mrs. Toad
November 25, 2008 10:27 AM

It was good to see that the hosptial turned away the woman with a 6-month old baby though. Obama would let her have the abortion if he had his weay....

FOCA says that a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy is absolute only up to the point of viability.

From FOCA: The term `viability' means that stage of pregnancy when, in the best medical judgment of the attending physician based on the particular medical facts of the case before the physician, there is a reasonable likelihood of the sustained survival of the fetus outside of the woman.

Here's FOCA if you want to read it. It's short: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2020:

Mrs. T

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.