CNN just reporting that the Obama girls will be attending Sidwell Friends, the posh private school where the Washington elite send their children.
I don't blame them for making the best choice open to them for educating their kids, but I just wish children whose parents don't have the Obama's money had the opportunity to choose their children's schools. Which they won't as long as the president and the party he leads are devoted to the failed old public school model. Ah,, limousine liberals...

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I also posted a full-bodied text and got a submission error message and (again) there was no way to retrieve the post and re-submit. This has happened now three times. Please tell everyone to copy their text before attempting to submit in the new captcha torture-encouraged Guantanamo. Otherwise, it inexplicably goes to note-in-a-bottle/lost-in-space limbo (not unlike those astronaut tools). Sad but true. Or as they said yesterday when I was 'guest teacher' for the day at the Dallas elementary school, "Que Lastima!
'Your Name' was Rawlins Gilliland.
What about stopping to consider Malia and Sasha for a second. Does anyone really think they can form and maintain normal peer relationships in a public D.C. school? At least kids in a "posh" private school are used to families with celebrity status.
Let's imagine that we voucherize the entire K-12 educational system. There were many moments in my childrens' education when I would have loved to just escape a bad teacher, bad curriculum, bad peers, etc etc. BUT, it's close to delusional to think that if all or even most of the students in the US were in private schools, they wouldn't turn into a new version of the public schools. Only with no oversight, no possibility of transparency, and no obligation to serve the entire community (in fact, in many rural areas, no school at all). And highly segregated by income, religion,race, and a host of other factors. That doens't look like an improvement to me.
Private schools and Ronald Wilson Reagan.
TIME Magazine
Monday, Apr. 26, 1982
A Boost for Private Schools
Reagan offers tax credits
Ronald Reagan could not have picked a better audience (4,200 members of the National Catholic Educational Association), or a more fitting date (April 15, the deadline for filing tax returns). His speech was chock-full of applause lines, and he hit nearly every one on cue. "I believe that working Americans are overtaxed and underappreciated." Cheers and applause. "I have come to Chicago to propose another tax bill that will allow them to keep a little more of their own money. I have come to propose a tuition tax credit for parents . . ." At this point, his listeners rose to their feet, roaring their support and drowning out his words. After the clamor died down, Reagan finished his sentence: "This tax credit will be for parents who bear the double burden of public and private school costs."
It was a gratifying reception for a President who has not heard a lot of applause lately. But elsewhere his plan is sure to provoke as many boos as cheers. Republican Bob Packwood of Oregon and Democrat Daniel Moynihan of New York introduced a tuition tax credit bill in the Senate in 1977, and a bitter debate has been raging ever since. Indeed, even as Reagan basked in last week's cheers, opponents of the program were mobilizing.
Under Reagan's proposal, families with adjusted gross annual incomes of $50,000 or less would be allowed to take a tax credit up to $ 100 in 1983 for each child in private elementary or secondary schools, up to $300 in 1984, up to $500 thereafter. Families earning between $50,000 and $75,000 would be eligible for partial credits. Declared Reagan: "We are offering help to the inner-city child who faces a world of drugs and crime, the child with special needs, and to families who still believe the Lord's Prayer will do them less harm in the schoolroom than good."
Opponents claim that credits would violate the constitutional principle of separation of church and state, since 80% of private school students are in parochial schools. They also contend that the legislation would damage the public school system by encouraging parents to put their children in private schools; an estimated 5 million students are enrolled in private schools, compared with 40 million in public schools, and that ratio has remained fairly steady over the past 15 years. Moreover, the tax credits would drain away funds needed to improve public education. Says Albert Shanker, president of the American Federation of Teachers: "There is no more reason to pay for private education than there is to pay for a private swimming pool for those who do not use public facilities."
Supporters contend that the plan would benefit those who most need help.
According to Gary Jones, a deputy under secretary of the Department of Education, 54% of the families sending children to private schools make less than $25,000 a year. Trying to blunt the church-state issue, Reagan stressed that the tax credits would go not to parochial schools but to the parents themselves. The President also emphasized that no credits would go to families that send their children to racially discriminatory schools. Finally, he argued that strengthening private schools would force public schools to improve their programs.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.