Crunchy Con

Why Jane Austen matters

Sunday November 30, 2008

Categories: Culture, Education

Reader Rick R. sends along this piece from a South Carolina high school teacher talking about why Jane Austen's novels speak to her public school students. Excerpt:

Jane Austen's characters have lives circumscribed by the social conventions of a rigid class system. Elinor Dashwood and Elizabeth Bennet are acutely aware that their lack of rank and money are insurmountable handicaps as they look for happy endings - or would be if they weren't just characters in Austen novels. As women, they are financially and socially dependent on men in their lives. In the ways that matter, they have little or no control over what happens to them.

Most of the students in this general level English class are circumscribed by the limits of class and money, too. The majority eat free or reduced-price lunches. They depend on the school bus for transportation. After high school they will go straight to work or the military, few of them able to pursue higher education. At least the English department's insistence that they read every day in class has turned many of them into voracious readers.

At some level they seem to know that their modern lives of easy entertainment and frank sexuality are unworthy compromises in the search for romance and love, that Austen's women have richer lives than their own. When impetuous Marianne Dashwood finally had a soft word for Colonel Brandon after rejecting him throughout "Sense and Sensibility," the class gave an audible sigh of satisfaction. When I told the class we only had about 10 more minutes of "Pride and Prejudice" to watch so I would just tell them the ending instead, they screamed.

The author of this piece, Kay McSpadden, has written a book about her teaching experiences, "Notes From a Classroom." Check it out.

Comments
Night Train
December 1, 2008 11:56 AM

Some of the comments are even sillier than the very silly post.

Your Name
December 1, 2008 12:19 PM

Rod, thank you for this post. My college-age daughters and I love Jane Austen. In fact, my oldest is in an Austen class at Univ of Dallas this semester. Yes, Austen's novels are very romantic (sigh!), but what I love most about her story lines is that the female protaganist usually makes a terrible mistake or series of terrible mistakes that she must first recognize as errors, then secondly she must take responsibility for her error, and finally she must atone for and make right the havoc she has wrought. Wonderful lessons of compassion and maturity that women need to ponder.

pentamom
December 1, 2008 4:52 PM

Yes, Elizabeth knows about Darcy's money from the beginning -- it is literally the first fact she learns about him -- and is utterly revolted by him. She bitterly rejects his first proposal while staying virtually on the grounds of his aunt's grand estate. She knows exactly who he is and what he is worth materially, and completely rejects him in every respect due solely to her opinion of his personality and character.

She finally accepts him after she discovered that he has risked his reputation and given up an amount of cash that even a wealthy man would feel, to preserve her family's reputation -- all the while attempting to conceal his generosity from as many people as possible, herself included. It wasn't even an overt bid for her good favor, but rather an attempted anonymous and disinterested effort to help right a wrong that he believed he had a part in.

To read P&P, or other Austen novels, as being all about women scheming to get a hold of men's money is way, WAY more shallow than seeing it as a romance. It betrays not only a chronological prejudice, but an absolute unfamiliarity with the very works being described.

Tocqueville
December 2, 2008 1:53 AM

Teaching school in York, South Carolina does not make one a "North Carolina teacher."

MargaretE
December 2, 2008 6:56 AM

Thanks for refreshing my memory, pentamom. And I agree with your thoughts wholeheartedly. Couldn't stand to see Lizzy Bennett maligned like that! Also, nice reference to "chronological prejudice." Sounds like you're well-versed in your C.S. Lewis, too - another one of my favorites...

Night Train, you must be pulling your hair out by now :)

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement