Leon Wieseltier is nauseated by the privileges claimed by the wealthy. Excerpt: I am tiring of very important people. I never saw the owl of Minerva fly through Harvard Yard. In a society as wounded as our own, there is...
As the saying goes, "what we don't learn through mercy we learn by judgement." If we're lucky...
CW
December 23, 2008 10:36 AM
Please edit the profanity out of the original post. Not appropriate for a PG site.
Max Schadenfreude
December 23, 2008 10:39 AM
I don't understand the uproar of the Caroline Schlossberg (yeah, THAT'S her name) and the Senate appointment.
Like it or not, the U.S. Senate is, by DESIGN, elitist.
Hundreds of years ago Aquinas put forth the idea that the ideal form of government would conatain elements of the three basic types that would limit one another: Monarchy, Oligarchy, Democracy. Sounds alot like Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. And note that the Legislative is itself a combination of two of these: Oligarchy (the Senate) and Democracy (the House of Representatives).
I know little of Mrs.Schlossberg. She has, after all, kept out of the public eye, which means that she has NOT participated in the scandals so associated with her family of origin. In my book, that's a good thing.
Of course I disagree with her politically, she is after all (in her words) "a Kennedy Democrat; a Clinton Democrat."
But as a person I suspect she has quite a bit on the ball. Elite? Is she? If so, it sounds like she's got the Sentate qualification down pat.
Besides, does anyone really think that she doesn't understand the political process, doesn't have access to savvy advisors, etc.?
So, while I don't care to see her in the Senate, it's not because of "lack of experience" (which seems like a complaint FROM an elitist, not OF one), nor that she is of a priviledged class. Rather, I don't want her there because of the issues; she's a liberal.
AnotherBeliever
December 23, 2008 11:16 AM
There will always be people who get things by merit of their connections and their family name. These people even turn up in the armed forces serving terms as officers generally. They catch a little grief for being who they are, though it is nice when someone from the elite families joins the military. More of them should serve. We all know that whether these young men and women continue in military service, or go on to academia or running a company or even politics, they will get where they want to be. They won't pay the same price for personal flaws and mistakes that most folks do. And they'll be insulated from a certain level of misfortune. But nobody's death-proof. We will all lose our loved ones, and eventually die ourselves, it doesn't matter what you name is. So don't get caught up in class advantages.
That Psalm came around in daily readings yesterday. I like verse 15 which ask that the Lord balance out days of affliction with days of joy. There has been rather a lot of hardship in the past year and a half, and I hope things won't be that hard again for some time to come. Maybe that's why I don't take all this economic doom and gloom so seriously: I'm not in Iraq, I'm not going back to Iraq. I'm in the United States of America where the vast majority of us have indoor plumbing, electricity 24 hours a day, and access to affordable food. I have time off for a change. I'm with the people I love, people I've been separated from for too long. The grief over my father's death is finally ebbing. (It doesn't so much decrease in intensity as in frequency, if that makes any sense.) Plus I have my mother's collie dog curled up next to me. We are both sitting looking at a lit-up real Christmas tree. Life is beautiful.
There will always be people who get things by merit of their connections and their family name. These people even turn up in the armed forces. They catch a little grief for being who they are. But we are (generally) glad to have them, and more of them should serve. We all know that whether these young men and women continue in military service, or go on to academia or running a company or even politics, they will get to where they want to be. They won't pay the same price for personal flaws and mistakes that most folks do. And they'll be insulated from a certain level of misfortune.
But nobody's death-proof. We will all lose our loved ones, and eventually die ourselves, it doesn't matter what your name is. So don't get caught up in these advantages.
AnotherBeliever
December 23, 2008 11:20 AM
Copy and pasting issues here... I hate Captcha.
Irenaeus
December 23, 2008 11:56 AM
"A Senate seat is a ... valuable thing, you just don't give it away for nothing."
As a certain governor Blagojovic has recently iterated:) I mean, Schlossberg should be required to buy it, at least.
KING: That is not your -- you don't use the name Schlossberg, do you? I mean, you do and you don't.
C. KENNEDY: Right. Well, I never really changed my name. But Ed is wonderful in every possible way.
Marian
December 23, 2008 1:10 PM
Caroline Kennedy is deathproof? Gimme a break. She lost her father when she was six years old, and her only sibling a few years ago. Not to mention various uncles, aunts, and cousins in between. Arguable, that's the downside of having a large family--more people to lose.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
As the saying goes, "what we don't learn through mercy we learn by judgement." If we're lucky...
Please edit the profanity out of the original post. Not appropriate for a PG site.
I don't understand the uproar of the Caroline Schlossberg (yeah, THAT'S her name) and the Senate appointment.
Like it or not, the U.S. Senate is, by DESIGN, elitist.
Hundreds of years ago Aquinas put forth the idea that the ideal form of government would conatain elements of the three basic types that would limit one another: Monarchy, Oligarchy, Democracy. Sounds alot like Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. And note that the Legislative is itself a combination of two of these: Oligarchy (the Senate) and Democracy (the House of Representatives).
I know little of Mrs.Schlossberg. She has, after all, kept out of the public eye, which means that she has NOT participated in the scandals so associated with her family of origin. In my book, that's a good thing.
Of course I disagree with her politically, she is after all (in her words) "a Kennedy Democrat; a Clinton Democrat."
But as a person I suspect she has quite a bit on the ball. Elite? Is she? If so, it sounds like she's got the Sentate qualification down pat.
Besides, does anyone really think that she doesn't understand the political process, doesn't have access to savvy advisors, etc.?
So, while I don't care to see her in the Senate, it's not because of "lack of experience" (which seems like a complaint FROM an elitist, not OF one), nor that she is of a priviledged class. Rather, I don't want her there because of the issues; she's a liberal.
There will always be people who get things by merit of their connections and their family name. These people even turn up in the armed forces serving terms as officers generally. They catch a little grief for being who they are, though it is nice when someone from the elite families joins the military. More of them should serve. We all know that whether these young men and women continue in military service, or go on to academia or running a company or even politics, they will get where they want to be. They won't pay the same price for personal flaws and mistakes that most folks do. And they'll be insulated from a certain level of misfortune. But nobody's death-proof. We will all lose our loved ones, and eventually die ourselves, it doesn't matter what you name is. So don't get caught up in class advantages.
That Psalm came around in daily readings yesterday. I like verse 15 which ask that the Lord balance out days of affliction with days of joy. There has been rather a lot of hardship in the past year and a half, and I hope things won't be that hard again for some time to come. Maybe that's why I don't take all this economic doom and gloom so seriously: I'm not in Iraq, I'm not going back to Iraq. I'm in the United States of America where the vast majority of us have indoor plumbing, electricity 24 hours a day, and access to affordable food. I have time off for a change. I'm with the people I love, people I've been separated from for too long. The grief over my father's death is finally ebbing. (It doesn't so much decrease in intensity as in frequency, if that makes any sense.) Plus I have my mother's collie dog curled up next to me. We are both sitting looking at a lit-up real Christmas tree. Life is beautiful.
There will always be people who get things by merit of their connections and their family name. These people even turn up in the armed forces. They catch a little grief for being who they are. But we are (generally) glad to have them, and more of them should serve. We all know that whether these young men and women continue in military service, or go on to academia or running a company or even politics, they will get to where they want to be. They won't pay the same price for personal flaws and mistakes that most folks do. And they'll be insulated from a certain level of misfortune.
But nobody's death-proof. We will all lose our loved ones, and eventually die ourselves, it doesn't matter what your name is. So don't get caught up in these advantages.
Copy and pasting issues here... I hate Captcha.
"A Senate seat is a ... valuable thing, you just don't give it away for nothing."
As a certain governor Blagojovic has recently iterated:) I mean, Schlossberg should be required to buy it, at least.
In her own words:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1002414,00.html
WHY DO YOU USE THE NAME KENNEDY ON YOUR BOOKS, RATHER THAN KENNEDY SCHLOSSBERG, YOUR MARRIED NAME?
I never actually changed my name. But people call me whatever they call me.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0205/07/lkl.00.html
KING: That is not your -- you don't use the name Schlossberg, do you? I mean, you do and you don't.
C. KENNEDY: Right. Well, I never really changed my name. But Ed is wonderful in every possible way.
Caroline Kennedy is deathproof? Gimme a break. She lost her father when she was six years old, and her only sibling a few years ago. Not to mention various uncles, aunts, and cousins in between. Arguable, that's the downside of having a large family--more people to lose.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.