So I was feeling pretty crappy tonight about my writing, and told Julie I would really like to try doing something else, like cooking for a living, because that way I'd know I was doing something worthwhile, something whose value was measurable and concrete, instead of this half-ass crap I do.
And then I picked up my New York Times opinion section, and read Bono's new column.
It's really, really bad. I mean, college journalism bad. It's about life lessons from Frank Sinatra. Excerpt:
We had spent some time in his house in Palm Springs, which was a thrill -- looking out onto the desert and hills, no gingham for miles. Plenty of miles, though, Miles Davis. And plenty of talk of jazz. That's when he showed me the painting. I was thinking the circles were like the diameter of a horn, the bell of a trumpet, so I said so."The painting is called 'Jazz' and you can have it."
I said I had heard he was one of Miles Davis's biggest influences.
Little pithy replies:
"I don't usually hang with men who wear earrings."
"Miles Davis never wasted a note, kid -- or a word on a fool."
"Jazz is about the moment you're in. Being modern's not about the future, it's about the present."
I think about this now, in this new year. The Big Bang of pop music telling me it's all about the moment, a fresh canvas and never overworking the paint. I wonder what he would have thought of the time it's taken me and my bandmates to finish albums, he with his famous impatience for directors, producers -- anyone, really -- fussing about. I'm sure he's right. Fully inhabiting the moment during that tiny dot of time after you've pressed "record" is what makes it eternal. If, like Frank, you sing it like you'll never sing it again. If, like Frank, you sing it like you never have before.
If.
Um, fully inhabiting the moment during that tiny dot of time after I finished this howler of a column, I felt better. Cheap comfort is still comfort. Of course, I could work at it every day for a thousand years and never write a rock song as good as Bono's lamer efforts. So there you are. Still, as newspaper columns go, this is not-un-Vogon-poetry-like.
UPDATE: Dan Drezner is similarly moved:
And, I have to say, his debut column is a smashing success. In just his first effort, Bono has already managed to combine the worst tropes of Thomas Friedman and Maureen Dowd and fuse them together into some new alchemy of awfulness.
Drezner asks his readers to read Bono's column and explain its theme in 20 words or less. Save your trouble; his effort can't be improved on: "Did you know that I knew Frank Sinatra?"

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Hi Rawlins,
Maybe a little explanation as to why I asked. I read the positive comments and decided to give it a second chance. Thus far, I haven't been able to finish it. Therefore, it might be fair to say that I didn't even give it one chance. I had a good laugh over Houghton's
"Dear Diary" comment, and I started to think that this might be the kind of writing that would appeal to me if I had too much to drink. Jazz appeals to me more when I've been drinking, so maybe alcohol could help me with Bono's writing. Unfortunately, my house is dry right now except for a fairly good(it's all relative-sort of like Bono) bottle of champaign that I never opened on New Years Eve, so I wasn't able to conduct my experiment. I thought that maybe you had tried the same experiment. I see your point. I like guys who aren't afraid to change their mind and say as much. I think it's great that you took the time to give it a second chance.
"Thus far, I haven't been able to finish it."
Don't bother. It's shit.
I dissent. I thought Bono's column was very well done. Stylistically, he's a very good writer. I had no trouble getting to the end. And as a guy heading into late middle age I found the different renditions of Sinatra's renditions of "My Way" poignant. It's not Bono's fault that he hangs with a different crown than I do and doesn't spend his evenings, like I do, reading this blog.
I just don't get it, I read this when it first came out and thought it was a good read. Obviously, Bono is not an article writer, he writes songs and lyrics, with that context it's a good read. As a young man, I didn't know much about Frank Sinatra and thought it was actually a sign of respect that Bono would write about him at length like that and show how much he respected and loved him as an artist.
Besides, Frank Sinatra gave him a painting......painted by Frank Sinatra. No wonder everyone hates Bono.
Its a pretty sad state of affairs with a celebrity of the likes of Bono becomes a serious columnist for the NY Times. His latest is about Obama's trip to Africa.
This is just another example of a celebrity who has an inflated view of his importance and wisdom. That would be OK on his own website or any number of places, but the NY Times????
I guess the Times, being in the same straights as most newspapers, is now sinking to a new low in order to boost circulation. I think serious journalism, whether in print, on cable, or on the web, is becoming an endangered species. It's not that Bono isn't serious, but that the only reason that he is being printed in the times is because of his celebrity status. If any of a number of struggling journalists submitted the same material, do you think they would be published? Of course not.
Celebrity journalism in the Times--a new low.r
God help us all.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.