Crunchy Con

"Jews, go back to the oven!"

Friday January 2, 2009

Categories: Islamic terrorism
Take a look at the video below, of a pro-Hamas demonstration earlier this week. Note the woman shouting, "Nuke, nuke Israel!", at about the 2 minute mark, and "Go back to the oven! You need a big oven, that's what...
Advertisement
Comments
Jon
January 2, 2009 7:46 AM

Re: No jihad in America, huh?

200 blithering idiots in full rant mode does not a jihad make. That's like saying a Fred Phelps "God hates fags" demonstration is the equiavlent of an auto da fe.

armchair pessimist
January 2, 2009 8:00 AM

Somewhere around minute 6 woman on the Israeli side exclaims "... so violent. They are so violent!"
Well, Duh, Sister. Really, how much longer are we going to stare at the same damn X-ray over and over again and judiciously keep telling one another "It's a tumor alright...Sure is a doozy... yep, sure is...yep.." ?

Your Name
January 2, 2009 9:19 AM

Evidentially somewhere along the way these people forgot that there is one Creator. Why would a parent consent to having His/Her children fight like idiots for no apparent reason. There is much to be said for the Blacks in Amreica who were brought here against their wills, loosing over 100,000,000 during a crossing into a hostile land, captured by heartless individuals. These people are in America fighting each other...Can they go Home to fight one another? Can they resolve any dispute civilly? Or is America the new stomping ground? too bad the Blacks did not have the same privledges...How sinister to ask your oppressor for assistance.

Ostrea
January 2, 2009 9:45 AM

Ah, the religion of peace.

Andrea
January 2, 2009 10:00 AM

Well, at least they're in public, shouting these vile things for everyone to see on national TV and giving other people a chance to rebut them or shout them down in the public square. That's what we do in America. We should give them as little respect as we would those creeps who protest the funerals of soldiers because they claim God hates gays or the half dozen or so yahoos who show up in hoods for the pitiful Ku Klux Klan rallys in the South. The majority of people know how marginalized people who hold these opinions are. It's what people are saying behind closed doors or teaching kids in the mosque that concerns me, though I'd have to acknowledge they have every right to say whatever they want there too.

But, yeah, I don't like Hamas either and I hate the way that radical Islamists view Israel and also the way they treat women and children.

Derek Copold
January 2, 2009 10:17 AM

Do we want such immigrants in our country?

Wow, what's that loud popping noise?

Oh, it's just Marty pulling his head out of his butt.

JPL
January 2, 2009 10:47 AM

Oh no! People of the Muslim faith are sometimes ignorant and cruel, particularly when angered over an emotionally-charged subject, and say things that they shouldn't say!

Thank God people of other faiths don't do that. Thank God no supposed Christian would say something like "We should bomb their countries and force them to convert to Christianity" concerning Muslim nations, after their own country had been attacked by Muslims.

And thank God we have Rod to point out this sort of valuable news to us.

What's that line from the Eagles..."you're still the same old girl you used to be."

Daniel
January 2, 2009 11:29 AM

Before we go down Peretz's Zionist dark alley about exporting all the "immigrants" because of their religion, I would hope that religious liberties absolutists like Rod would be the first at the ships defending the rights of Muslims to say the things they do.

Rod Dreher
January 2, 2009 11:50 AM

Marty Peretz himself, in his post defends the right of the foaming lunatic Muslim woman to wish all Jews back to the crematoria. But defending the right to say it does not imply that saying so is unproblematic -- nor does it imply that we should be indifferent to the presence among us of people who believe and say such hideous things.

Daniel
January 2, 2009 11:54 AM

Agreed completely. But the fact that Peretz calls them "immigrants" bolsters the sense that deportations could be appropriate for people who even voice support for orthodox Islam.

Derek Copold
January 2, 2009 12:33 PM

But the fact that Peretz calls them "immigrants" bolsters the sense that deportations could be appropriate for people who even voice support for orthodox Islam.

It is appropriate for non-citizens given the ideological threat. Shocking as it is to liberals, non-citizens have no inalienable "right" to be here. At any rate even that much commonsense isn't stated in Peretz's view. He's more looking at our idiotic policy of continuing to import this threat.

Of course, for you, Daniel, this is all a distraction from your favorite sport of hating on other Americans, particularly Texans.

Your Name
January 2, 2009 12:36 PM

Yes, Daniel, and your use of the word "bolster" implies that you wish to see Peretz made into upholstery.

Daniel
January 2, 2009 12:51 PM

It is appropriate for non-citizens given the ideological threat.

Of course, Peretz has no idea of the immigration/citizenship status of these protesters. By calling them "immigrants," it's easier to argue they should all be deported. But it ignores the fact that they may be citizens or that even their parents were citizens. Peretz seems traditional, cultural Muslim dress and assumes they are fresh off the boat, even if their relatives may have been here for a generation or so.

Derek Copold
January 2, 2009 1:42 PM

Of course, Peretz has no idea of the immigration/citizenship status of these protesters.

Looking at the video, I can see that, excepting the usual bottom-dwelling A.N.S.W.E.R.-type activists and traitors, a lot of the people there are either first- or second-generation imports. They certainly carry themselves as such.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume the usual willful blindness of the modern liberal and say all these people are converted Mayflower descendants. So what? Why do we want to import MORE of this problem?

Moody
January 2, 2009 2:09 PM

Just sad.

Daniel
January 2, 2009 2:16 PM

Why do we want to import MORE of this problem?

Would you have supported immigration bans on the Irish or Catholics during the reign of the IRA? How about the deportation of second-generation Irish?

The problem, Derek, is that you haven't really identified the "problem" that needs to be avoided by banning "imports." Are all Muslims suspect? Only traditionalists? Anyone who supports Palestine? Anyone who attends a mosque? How specifically are you planning on avoiding the "import" of "this problem."

I don't have any problem with not allowing known terrorists or those with terrorist ties from immigrating or being granted visas; no sane person does. The problem we've seen over the last eight years is that even narrowing down that category of people has been a challenge and that the label "terrorist" has taken on such a broad scope it could include almost anyone.


Anglican
January 2, 2009 2:20 PM

Islam is a problem and yes this is mainstream Islam. I am so G- damn sick of people of a certain ilk,telling us this is a small fringe. It is not true, Islam is not like any other faith, it is a total system, it is a political ideology wed to a religion, and no it is not comporable to conservative Christians. Various Islamic groups have engaged in approximately 12,000 terrorist attacks in which at least one person has died since September 11th. Sure there are crazy kooks in every religion, but still, something isn't right here is it? Why is that? I got an answer, and that is Islam, and now I know you that grates pious types,but it is true. The Qu'ran contains open ended mandates to war and all four schools of Sunni Islamic jurisprudence and and Shia Islam have a generally beligerant demeanor towards non-Muslims.This is fact!And don't go find some fringe weirdo like Irshad Manji to rebut me. Mainstream Islam is stuff like Ibn Kathir,and the Al Azhar,Ayatollah Khomenini and the Shia jurist at Qom. Even worse is the vast body of hadith and legal text. Islam teaches hate for the infidel,the end.And the Bible comparisons don't work, yes the Old testament contains some nasty stuff, but it is situational,and not intended for those outside the narrative,beyond fringe kooks, find me some mainstream Catholic,Orthodox,Traditonal Protestant,i.e. Lutheran or Anglican or Jewish exegetes that use the Exodus text,as justification to mass murder and conquest.Find me a Biblical equivalent of Surah 9:29. And the Crusades don't count,as at least in theory,they where an attempt at responding to unprovoked Muslim violence.

With out going into much more detail, I have personal experience with Islam, and I have studied it in depth. Lets just say, it is the only non-Christian religion, I have deep personal experience with. I am very sorry, but Islam poses some very deep challenges to us in the west, that cannot be white washed or wished away. For your sake and that of your children ditch the p.c. platitudes and open your damn eyes. It is perfectly reasonable to be concerned about Muslim immigrants and the potential dangers and challenges they pose without being a bigot. I generally have no problem with immigrants,but Islam is different and if you can't see or awknowledge that,you just may be a fool.

John E. - Agn. Stoic
January 2, 2009 2:37 PM

If they cross the line from angry speech to illegal actions, arrest them.

Until then, keep an eye on them.

What's the problem?

John E. - Agn. Stoic
January 2, 2009 2:37 PM

If they cross the line from angry speech to illegal actions, arrest them.

Until then, keep an eye on them.

What's the problem?

Derek Copold
January 2, 2009 3:20 PM

Would you have supported immigration bans on the Irish or Catholics during the reign of the IRA?

Willful blindness in action again. The United States was never directly targeted by the Irish. Nor was the U.S. ever the subject of hostile papal bulls because of our position on Northern Ireland.

How specifically are you planning on avoiding the "import" of "this problem."

Cut off immigration from Muslim countries, especially problem children like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Do not renew visas from said problem children.

Of course, we can make case-by-case exceptions for religious and political dissenters.

The problem we've seen over the last eight years is that even narrowing down that category of people has been a challenge and that the label "terrorist" has taken on such a broad scope it could include almost anyone.

That's because religious terrorists swim in seas of imported populations. Even when a minority support terrorist goals, it still translates in hundreds of thousands of sympathizers. So why import any of it, unless it to advance that strange mental onanism known as multiculturalism?

Derek Copold
January 2, 2009 3:27 PM

If they cross the line from angry speech to illegal actions, arrest them. Until then, keep an eye on them. What's the problem?

Because importing more of them creates a bigger constituency to support their "solutions", both legal and illegal.

Daniel
January 2, 2009 3:30 PM

So why import any of it, unless it to advance that strange mental onanism known as multiculturalism?

So you are suggesting we impose a religion test on immigration to the U.S.? If you are Muslim, you may not immigrate or be granted a visa? Will there be a stop date for this religion test or is it just never-ending?

Your Name
January 2, 2009 3:50 PM

@Derek Copold
Would you recommend that we also disallow immigration from countries like Germany, France, and the UK with large Muslim populations? Many of the Islamic terrorists that have struck Western targets seem to have resided in Europe at one point or another.

If you would recommend that, would you want to disallow all European immigration, or would you want to insitute some sort of formal religion test?

Derek Copold
January 2, 2009 4:22 PM

So you are suggesting we impose a religion test on immigration to the U.S.?

Apparently, you didn't read what I wrote, so I'm not sure how fruitful conversation with you will be.

What I wrote is that we should target particular countries that are problematic. There's no actual religious test. Granted, a fortunate byproduct would be that we keep out unwanted Muslim immigration. Of course, if those countries cease to be problematic, we can review their status. It's up to them. Personally, I don't care if we never allow them in. I'm sure that gives you all sorts of heartburn, Daniel, but that only tells me I'm on the right track.

Would you recommend that we also disallow immigration from countries like Germany, France, and the UK with large Muslim populations?

That wouldn't be practical. I would ideally put up a religious bar, but the usual suspects would make it legally problematic. Barring large importation from problem countries will at least make it a lot easier to screen out terrorist candidates from more civilized places, like Europe. IOW, it's far simpler to positively screen for terrorism when you're checking the background of someone coming from France, Germany or the UK than it is from some backward corrupt hole; i.e., pick just about any country from the OIC.

And, yes, we missed these guys in the case of 9/11, but that's largely due to the fact that our bi-partisan immigration policy in this country has been to shove our heads in the sand and pretend there's no problem.

Baluba
January 2, 2009 9:16 PM

The idea of exclusion by religion misses the mark. Besides, it's a political non-starter. It's not WHO immigrants believe in that kills, it WHAT they believe in. Before leaving their own country, anyone who wants to live in the US should be prepared to submit to, and pay for, screening similar to that required of applicants for US civil service or military training, including a background check and psychological evaluation. Any prospective resident unable to convince immigration officials that they will support and serve the freedoms and obligations of US citizens should stay away.

Daniel
January 2, 2009 9:50 PM

"Personally, I don't care if we never allow them in. I'm sure that gives you all sorts of heartburn, Daniel, but that only tells me I'm on the right track."

Defending our founding principles is a lonely job, Derek, which is why I have the heartburn. But your approach should definitely come as welcome relief to Christians all over the world who are in the minority. They know they need not turn to the U.S. to protect religious liberty and that they are own their own fighting fascist governments that want to exclude religious people who are a "threat."

Willie
January 3, 2009 8:27 AM

I watched the video and was very upset by it. I have sent it to my contacts here in Florida that have been organizing peaceful protests for Gaza. None of us are Pro-Hamas so that label is incorrectly applied. We support the people of Gaza who are being murdered and injured by the ongoing bombing by Israel. Israel is not defending itself but have trapped 1.5 million people in a narrow strip of land without food, water, electricity and medical supplies for months now. Sderot was built on the ashes of a destroyed Palestinian village so Israel is defending what is not really theirs. Over 500 Palestinian villages were destroyed in 1948 and the residents of those villages and their children and grandchildren now live in refugee camps because they were not allowed to go back to their homes. Their only wish is to return to their land and live in freedom with basic human rights. This is also their right under the Geneva Convention. Settlements may have been removed but Israel continues to kill people in Gaza routinely - they control the land, sea and air and the people are trapped in a prison - unable to leave -

As a Christian I must stand up for the oppressed - Jesus said Blessed are the Peacemakers -

Willie
January 3, 2009 12:04 PM

I have heard from people who were at this demonstration and extremely abusive words were said by the other side also. We all need to keep our protests peaceful and show respect for each other.

Scott R.
January 3, 2009 12:46 PM

As a Christian I must stand up for the oppressed - Jesus said Blessed are the Peacemaker

Would you ever have thought to stand up for Jews when your co-religionists were crushing us under their boots for 15 centuries?

You say you were upset by the video and devoted one sentence to it. Then you devoted several paragraphs to a rant against Israel. Also extremely one sided.

Those bastards were talking about putting me and my children in ovens - American Jews. How much would you really stand up for us? How hard would you work to keep those people from putting us in those ovens if you knew we were unflinchingly pro-Israel?

Not real hard I'll bet.

Derek Copold
January 3, 2009 3:12 PM

Defending our founding principles is a lonely job, Derek, which is why I have the heartburn.

Letting in hostile populations is not one of our founding principles, Daniel, so get off that high horse. In fact, most of the founders would view our current immigration policy as unadulterated idiocy.

But your approach should definitely come as welcome relief to Christians all over the world who are in the minority. They know they need not turn to the U.S. to protect religious liberty and that they are own their own fighting fascist governments that want to exclude religious people who are a "threat."

How is that any different from the reality as it is now? Where have we ever intervened to preserve a Christian population in any serious manner? Nor should we, quite frankly. If you want to go abroad looking for monsters to slay, Daniel, Delta is ready when you are.

To be clear, too, Daniel, I'm not a Christian. I'm an atheist.

Daniel
January 3, 2009 3:46 PM

"I'm an atheist."

Which explains your general hostility to religious liberty, it appears.

Willie
January 3, 2009 3:55 PM

Jews are not the only ones to have suffered - look at what the US did to the Native American and the blacks - I do not see them constantly moaning and groaning but trying to make better lives for them and their children. My family was driven out of Acadia in 1755 - just as the Palestinians - but we don't let it consume our whole lives with hatred.

Derek Copold
January 3, 2009 6:18 PM

Which explains your general hostility to religious liberty, it appears.

Oh, nonsense. There's no right to immigrate. WE have the right to determine who we bring in, and importing muhammadans is, in the long run, hazardous to our liberty. See Holland. See Denmark. See Britain. See any of the 57 OIC countries. Equating immigration with some nebulous religious liberty is just so much mental masturbation.

Jon
January 5, 2009 12:16 PM

Re: Islam is not like any other faith, it is a total system, it is a political ideology wed to a religion

At one time this was true of all religions, except maybe Buddhism-- true of Christianity and (ancient) Judaism, and certainly of Confucianism and Japanese Shinto.
The West introduced the notion of separating religion and politics into discrete spheres of activity 300 years ago after the religious bloodbath of the 16th and 17th centuries. The idea caught on (or more often was imposed by force) on many other areas of the world too-- most recently with the destruction of Japanese State Shinto after WWII. It has not yet fully penetrated the Islamic world (Turkey, yes; Iran and Saudi Arabia not at all) but I don't see any likelihood that Islam will be able to hold out indefinitely. There's a sort of natural selection at work in politics too, and societies that waste huge amounts of time, money and effort unproductively (and arguing or imposing theology by government is very unproductive, both polurically and religiously) tend to fail. Islam either reforms itself or it will go the way of the Bolsheviks.

Your Name
January 5, 2009 12:17 PM

Re: Islam is not like any other faith, it is a total system, it is a political ideology wed to a religion

At one time this was true of all religions, except maybe Buddhism-- true of Christianity and (ancient) Judaism, and certainly of Confucianism and Japanese Shinto.
The West introduced the notion of separating religion and politics into discrete spheres of activity 300 years ago after the religious bloodbath of the 16th and 17th centuries. The idea caught on (or more often was imposed by force) on many other areas of the world too-- most recently with the destruction of Japanese State Shinto after WWII. It has not yet fully penetrated the Islamic world (Turkey, yes; Iran and Saudi Arabia not at all) but I don't see any likelihood that Islam will be able to hold out indefinitely. There's a sort of natural selection at work in politics too, and societies that waste huge amounts of time, money and effort unproductively (and arguing or imposing theology by government is very unproductive, both polurically and religiously) tend to fail. Islam either reforms itself or it will go the way of the Bolsheviks.

John Hampton
January 5, 2009 3:59 PM
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/mostert/060226.

Soon as the Islamics gain strenght here in the USA they will get much bolder. This demonstration will be viewed as the good old days. They hate the Jews but they also hate Christians with a passion. In the province of Kosovo which Bill Clinton won for them in a war with the Yugoslav Serbs, Islamics bombed most of the Christian Churches to rubble.

Willie
January 5, 2009 10:35 PM

This is all total nonsense. I thought this was a religious site but seems to be a racist one. No one hates Jews - it is ZIonism that is the problem and always has been. Jews are also at these protests - I have talked with them and they feel the same as I do. No one is totally American except for the Indians -all of our families came from somewhere else - mine came from England and France in the early 1600's. Muslims worship the same God as we do - they just don't believe Jesus is divine but will be when He comes again. I have many Muslims friends who are more Christian in their attitude than many people who are writing on this blog.

Your Name
January 7, 2009 10:07 AM

It saddens me to see what you are focusing on. Yes some inappropriate things were said, but if you pay close attention that was the thinking of one (regards to the oven). Did you notice that she chanted by herself? From the looks of it, someone prompted her with God knows what. I can say from personal experience when peacefully protesting in Houston, Texas, I have been told to, 'Go to hell!', 'Go f@$% myself' by my 'peaceful' neighbors the jews. Given that I have not heard from my family in Gaza in well over 2 months God knows what I could have said and done to those people, but what good does that do? As I recall correctly, when the Twin Towers were hit there were some pretty radical thoughts being verbalized about ALL Arabs by Americans. The fact stands that there is a HORRIBLE and HORRIFFIC situation going on in Gaza, Palestine right now. This needs to be addressed by our President and soon.

Your Name
January 7, 2009 1:02 PM

How is it our President's business? Many attempts have been made and pressures applied to bring peace to the region, to no avail. This is something they will have to sort out for themselves. The US is hated for being the world's policeman, and constantly criticised for not doing enough policing. We have enough problems at the moment within our own country, it's time to focus on us.

A Muslim
January 7, 2009 1:31 PM

I am a Muslim,and let me tell you my Muslim brothers and sisters. These kind of actions are very bad. It does not seem that they are being good examples or stewards of Islam. Stuff like this will paint all of Islam's follower as bad violent people. Your actions get a lot more attention then your words. Swearing at people is not good action.

Your Name
January 7, 2009 3:58 PM

I am trying to understand: if a woman like this was killed or wounded - would it be considered as a "peaceful population casualty"? If one of 70 000 Iranian students who volunteered to blow themselves up in Israel was harmed, would we call him a “Boy, caught in a crossfire?”
I am trying to understand: how dos it happen that Israel blockade of Gaza prevents bringing there food and medication but doesn’t stop rocket launchers.
By the way – how much one of those may cost, and how much food and medication this money could buy?

Willie
January 7, 2009 7:56 PM

Here is what is happening in Florida:

http://cbs4.com/local/South.Florida.Jews.2.901682.html

I have been called all kinds of names for supporting the people in Gaza. I don't understand why my Christian brothers and sisters think I am supporting Hamas and want to see Israel destroyed. I cannot even get them to understand that my heart bleeds for the thousands being killed when they are innocent civilians. As a mother it breaks my heart to see many among the dead little children - totally innocent. It could also have far reaching consequences - in that little children, seeing their families blown apart could grow up with hatred in their hearts.

Your Name
January 9, 2009 12:24 PM

Thank you, Willie, for the link!
Could you find one of a demonstration in Gaza, or West Bank, or Iran or any Muslim country protesting missile attacks on Israel? I couldn’t.
You are obviously a kind and caring person, but it feels that you are more concerned for the children that their parents are. The vote for Hamas in 2007 was nearly unanimous. No one in Gaza seams to protest their policies and practices even now. The parents of these children do not yet trade their weapons for food, or health care, or peace. The children will be raised as haters of the same people who have sent them humanitarian help and continue to straggle to ensure their safety. Hamas has to either accept the reality, disarm and start doing what they use to do so well years ego – taking care of people, or they will have go. They are endangering their own people.

Lena
January 9, 2009 4:38 PM

Oh Willie, is any part of your big bleeding heart cry for innocent Jewish civilian and particularly innocent Jewish children who afraid to sleep at night for several years, because of Hamases’s bombs could go to their beds any minute? Or because Jewish place in the oven any way, they don’t deserve any right to protect their innocent children?

Matt
January 11, 2009 6:36 PM

You know what? I never saw Jews dancing in the street on 9/11. I didn't see Israelis cheering the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

The palestinians can all go to hell. Whatever compassion I had for them disappeared when I saw how happy they were about 9/11. May the rest of their miserable lives be wretched. I don't care if they starve, get blown up, die of horrible diseases - just as long as they go ahead and die - and then they can burn in hell.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.