Ever thought about how you would have reacted had you lived in Nazi Germany? Ronald Bailey reflects on a famous experiment that meant to discover whether it could happen here, in America. His conclusion is instructive:
However, the arc of American history has been toward correcting old evils and the commissioning of fewer atrocities over time. Why? Because our institutions of freedom have maintained and expanded the norms that limit the powers wielded by authorities.For example, a free press is able to criticize practices like slavery and racial discrimination and help establish new norms. If Bill and Joanne down the street send their kids Joe and Kathy to an ethnically mixed school, in other words, it must be OK. In addition, American governmental powers are fragmented and in competition with one another. As another Milgram experiment showed, if two experimenters disagreed about continuing the experiment, the majority of participants sided with the one who argued for stopping it. In other words, when people could refer to an authority figure who agreed with their moral views, they were much more likely to act on them. Similarly, dividing up governmental power increases the chances that some authorities will act ethically and thus inspire people to act on the dictates of their consciences.
Milgram didn't really explore why it was that Germans created death camps while Americans did not. The answer is liberty. In 1974, Milgram more generously noted, "It is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act." Americans have not escaped the natural human tendency to defer to authority. Instead, we have had the good fortune to find ourselves in the situation where our social institutions have traditionally limited what authorities can get away with. The institutions of liberty are what enable people to act on what Lincoln called, "the better angels of our nature."
In other words, American culture, society and government are structured in ways that discourage the kind of thing that led to Nazi totalitarianism. The capacity to be a Nazi resides within each of us, but there are fundamental aspects of our culture that keep these potentialities in check. The lesson to draw from this, I think, is that culture and culture-making institutions matter. A lot. This is a point similar to what Sam Huntington wrote about how these American institutions evolved out of an Anglo-Protestant culture, and we would be foolish to give up on that culture, even as Anglo-Protestants are in relative decline.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Dittos to durhonker. It also takes a fuhrer (or a general/first party secretary/chairman, or a duce, or some other form of dictator by another name) to quash rivals for power and compel compliance among the masses. Obama's premature canonization notwithstanding, the legislative and judicial branches in this country would stand down for no one man or woman. Far more likely than the U.S. federal government arrogating powers to the point of virtual totalitarianism is the U.S. federal government mission-creeping -- with the blessing of a befuddled, egalitarian-obsessed majority -- into a bloated, inefficient system of bureaus propping up myriad nationalized departments and, yes, industries, that innovate nothing, create no wealth and exist or desist at the bureaucrats' behest. Punishing the productive with taxes and rewarding the unproductive with entitlements, the Socialist States of America is a very real possibility.
Get a grip Zach, the "socialists" won't be coming for you anytime in this lifetime. Too much Rush and Hannity methinks.
Say it ain't so Joe. I think we're already a quasi-socialist state and are continuing down that path (Social Security, Medicare, industry bailouts). Seems like it's a natural progression of our liberal form of government. Zach may not like it, but it's not necessarily a bad thing, seems to work quite well in Europe. The majority of people from there that I've met in my many travels are quite content with their system. It may take us a while to catch up but we've only been around for a couple hundred years.
Mike, I find it amusing when people say that the US has "only been around for a couple hundred years." Bear in mind that we have the oldest constitution on the planet and arguably the oldest government. (Britain being the only possible exception.) Some of the New England states have more than 300 years of peaceful democratic government. I think this means we're doing something right.
By contrast, most of the governments in Europe have been around for only 50 years or so, and some of them (e.g. Spain) were still full blown fascist states as late as the mid-70's. The jury is still out on whether or not Eurotopian style socialism is sustainable for more than one generation. Personally, I don't think it is. They simply don't have the money to fund such lavish welfare benefits with a shrinking workforce. Within the next few decades the Eurotopians will either have to drastically cut their welfare or become nearly failed states - along the lines of Greece (which is increasingly resembling Columbia or Pakistan in terms of stability).
Excellent points durhonker, I'm not sold on the European plan either, but seems like we are headed that way. Since we're on the slow path we'll have longer than 50 years to hopefully not mess things up. Probably won't be around to see the end results, in Europe or at home. They're suplementing their shrinking workforce via immigration as we are as well, but can either of us fund our entitlements? Doesn't look good from my house.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.