Did you watch the Academy Awards last night? Me, no. I almost never get to the movies these days (kids, babysitters, etc.), so I wasn't that interested in the show. But thanks to Ross and the magic of YouTube, we...
I was pretty jazzed to see all those Bollywood folks. (Anil Kapoor, wooooo!!!) Otherwise I really didn't care.
Oh, and it was cool when Phillipe Petit balanced the oscar on his face.
prufrockn
February 23, 2009 12:50 PM
It's nice that Winslet finally got the Oscar, but her performance in "The Reader" was very performance-y and I'm not at all surprised that Hathaway's excellent performance was looked over.
Also, Mickey Rourke should've won Best Actor. Bah. I've realized by now that mine and the Academy's definition of a good performance differ slightly.
alkali
February 23, 2009 12:56 PM
I think it's perfect that Ross Douthat's favorite part of the Oscars is the "In Memoriam" montage. If Ross didn't really exist, Flannery O'Connor would have had to make him up.
JJ
February 23, 2009 1:01 PM
The awards were a mixture of good and bad.
I found the strident, moralistic and intolerant gay sex activism of Sean Penn and that Milk writer very tiresome.
"I think that it is a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect, and anticipate their great shame, and the shame in their grandchildren's eyes if they continue that way of support. We've got to have equal rights for everyone.
And there are these last 2 things. I'm very, very proud to live in a country that is willing to elect an elegant man President."
Sean Penn, acceptance speech
"But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families, that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value, and that no matter what anyone tells you God does love you and that very soon I promise you, you will have equal rights federally across this great nation of ours."
No wonder ordinary people aren't watching the Oscars, when they are tarred as bigots all the time.
Wolf
February 23, 2009 1:36 PM
JJ.
Moralistic and intolerant talk about the Pot calling the Kettle Black
The Man From K Street
February 23, 2009 1:37 PM
Wow, I really need to be a more regular hawk of the obituary columns. Close to half of the actors profiled (Cy Charisse, Van Johnson, James Whitmore, etc.) I didn't even know had kicked in the past year.
But how does one set a Google Alert for that sort of thing? Easy to do (as I have) for the last living First World War veterans--there are less than a half dozen of them left. But how to cull hundreds of potential noteworthy names from the thousands of obituaries that run every day?
Scott Walker
February 23, 2009 1:38 PM
I can't work up much interest in an evening of moral preening from a group of people who are paid to make faces.
Rachel
February 23, 2009 1:42 PM
Thank you for posting the video. Had you seen it during the ceremony, you would have seen most of it from the perspective of those sitting in the furthest seat of the highest balcony. Even with a large screen TV, I couldn't read the names/ranks of those to whom the tribute was paid.
The only movie receiving nomination which I saw last year was Frost/Nixon, so I didn't have a dog in the hunt. I watch it for the red carpet and the theatricality of the whole thing. I liked the way the best and supporting actor/actress awards were presented - by having five prior award winners in each category pay tribute to each nominee before the winner was read. I didn't like the montage of other best picture films edited into the clip of each of the best picture nominees.
I liked the juxtaposition of Bill Maher's anti-God diatribe with the Slumdog Millionaire best score/best song writer's thanking of God for his blessings.
I rolled my eyes at Sean Penn's angry, vitriolic acceptance speech. I am sympathetic to gay people who want to live their lives but also sympathetic to religious conservatives who fear, rightly in my opinion, that legalized gay marriage will impact what the churches teach. I also cringed at de Niro's tribute to Penn in which he lauded Penn for meeting with foreign leaders. Saddam? Chavez? I'm willing to put my dislike of a star's politics aside and evaluate him or her on his or her work, but I don't want my nose rubbed in his/her politics.
I liked the set (and especially the Swarovski crystal curtain) and the placement of the orchestra onstage instead of in the pit.
I liked the Tina Fey/Steve Martin screen writers' segment and the fact that the presenters appeared to be sober.
I didn't like or get Ben Stiller's schtick which the audience seemed to think hilarious. It must've been an inside joke.
Derek Copold
February 23, 2009 1:43 PM
But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families...
...that they should join his good friends at the People's Temple. Free refreshments available!
Daniel
February 23, 2009 1:59 PM
Expecting people involved in "Milk" not to talk about gay rights and equality is like expecting people who make Holocaust films not to talk about anti-Semitism or a film about Dr. King not to talk about African American civil rights.
Harvey Milk is a martyr figure, assassinated by a religious right politician weeks after defeating an anti-gay initiative sponsored by religious conservatives in California. His life is the stuff that movies and movements are made of.
There has been some discussion that the reaction in the gay community to Prop 8 was fueled, in part, by the release of "Milk," 30 years after Milk's assassination at the hands of Dan White.
Alicia
February 23, 2009 2:05 PM
The Oscars are long, and watching them, even for film buffs like me, becomes a bit of a chore by around 10:30 p.m.
I'm not a big fan of Sean Penn the political activist, but Sean Penn the actor richly deserved the Best Actor award, and I thought his acceptance speech, which contained something of an apology for being such a pill, wasn't bad except for the close. "Milk" is a fine film, and those who haven't seen it really ought to do so, IMO.
I'm for equal rights for all, but I don't believe that attempting to shame those who believe differently is in any way the right approach.
I thought the new system of having 5 former winners in each acting category give a tribute to each nominee before the winner was named was very classy. Unfortunately, it's the kind of thing that quickly becomes stale, so I hope they don't make it a permanent feature of the Oscars. Still, it was nice to see terrific actors who weren't going to win (Frank Langella, and Richard Jenkins, and Josh Brolin, and Viola Davis, anyone?) get their due.
I love actors, and I love watching the celebrity audience reaction shots during the Oscars. Yes, there is a certain amount of self-congratulation and phoniness, but who cares? My life would be immeasurably less rich if it weren't for the movies. BTW, Rod, I also highly recommend "The Reader."
Alicia
February 23, 2009 2:17 PM
Hi, Rachel,
Ben Stiller was doing his best Joaquin Phoenix impression. If you have a chance to watch the video of Phoenix's recent appearance on David Letterman (which you should be able to view online) Stiller's schtick will make perfect sense.
Rich
February 23, 2009 2:24 PM
Slumdog deserved every award it won. It is a wonderful film, especially for me having spent so much time in Mumbai. I almost spit out my drink on my first viewing as the first spoken word in the film is probably the filthiest Hindi/Urdu curse word around. And the Amitabh scene was one of the funniest and grossest things in any movie.
Denton
February 23, 2009 2:30 PM
I was disappointed to see the award for Best Actor go to a political agenda, as opposed to Micky Rourke.
And, JJ is absolutely right.
Rachel
February 23, 2009 2:33 PM
Thanx, Alicia! I checked it out, and now I get it and understand why everybody else did, as well.
AML
February 23, 2009 3:03 PM
The best movie I saw this year wasn't nominated for anything. That was "Gran Torino": interesting meaningful story, excellent acting (including a very special young woman, a good original song (when there were only 3 even nominated for Oscar?.
It makes it hard to take the Oscars seriously as recognition of artistic achievement, and not just as a political forum.
Is anyone else having any trouble this site while using Mozilla Firefox as browzer?
alkali
February 23, 2009 3:27 PM
Further to what Daniel said, if you expect a gay man who wins an Oscar for writing a screenplay about a gay politician not to bring up gay political issues in any way during his 45-second Oscar acceptance speech, you are headed for a lot of disappointment.
Barmy Fotheringay-Phipps
February 23, 2009 3:31 PM
AML:
"Gran Torino" wasn't nominated for anything? That's surprising. I had the impression it had been nominated for something. My wife and I just saw it this last weekend and thought it very good -- one of the better movies we've seen in a while. The denouement was not only unexpected but also satisfying on many levels.
A minor point but probably of interest to some here: the Catholic priest, and religion generally, receives very sympathetic treatment in the film.
Barmy Fotheringay-Phipps
February 23, 2009 3:34 PM
Sorry. The repeat post was inadvertent. I received some strange error the first time about "service not available" and thought my initial attempt failed.
Alicia
February 23, 2009 3:56 PM
AML and Barmy, for those who haven't seen "Gran Torino" yet, this is a SPOILERISH comment, but I thought this was a wonderful film.
My favorite part (to those who have seen the film) was the marvelous double "fake-out" and I won't say any more. You know what I mean if you've seen the film. Clint Eastwood has won at the Oscars too many times, I think the Academy overlooked this terrific performance mainly because he has won so many times.
Sacramento Bea
February 23, 2009 4:19 PM
JJ,
"I found the strident, moralistic and intolerant gay sex activism of Sean Penn and that Milk writer very tiresome."
As you are welcomed to do. However, many others of us found both of them a welcome breath of fresh air, not to mention the truth and reality of the situation.
"I think that it is a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect, and anticipate their great shame, and the shame in their grandchildren's eyes if they continue that way of support. We've got to have equal rights for everyone.
And there are these last 2 things. I'm very, very proud to live in a country that is willing to elect an elegant man President."
Sean Penn, acceptance speech
"But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families, that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value, and that no matter what anyone tells you God does love you and that very soon I promise you, you will have equal rights federally across this great nation of ours."
To which you reply, "No wonder ordinary people aren't watching the Oscars, when they are tarred as bigots all the time."
Neither person used the word "bigot" in their speeches. You even bothered to copy/paste their speeches for all the world to see and that word just isn't there. If you have to resort to falsehoods to make your point, you've already lost the battle. If you've read this blog for any time at all, you know exactly for whom that epithet is saved.
Meanwhile, I was happy to hear the word "shame" coonsidering what a hot topic shame has been on Rod's blog these past couple of weeks. Truth and justice ring out in both acceptance speeches, and I thank you for posting them.
Does anyone know to what Sean Penn was referring to when he mentioned "hate signs" on protestors outside the hall?
AML
February 23, 2009 5:13 PM
Yes, Barmy, I agree that the treatment of religion, the wide range of attitudes toward religion and the changes in the characters, all felt real and true. And the young priest was putstanding.
Gran Torino deserves a second viewing, more than some of the other films deserve a first.
Alicia: "Clint Eastwood has won at the Oscars too many times, I think the Academy overlooked this terrific performance mainly because he has won so many times."
It doesn't seem to have held them back in Meryl Streeps case, for one. And it wasn't just the performance, but also the story, the direction, production, and some of the music. His hand was in everything and bravura throughout. To not nominated and of these just underlines that something political is going on.
Your Name
February 23, 2009 5:33 PM
Sorry for not proofing. To not nominated and of these just underlines that something political is going on.
Should be "to not nominate any of these"
RDF
February 23, 2009 5:39 PM
I didn't see Milk - but to describe those two speeches as "gay sex activism" is utterly moronic. I'm no fan of Sean Penn's sanctimonious demeanor - but Black's mildly political acceptance speech was reasonable and heartfelt.
I was happy to see Kate Winslet win for "The Reader." What a frustrating and compelling movie! That film is so interesting for its strengths, its flaws, its ambiguous resolution (What lesson did Hanna learn?) - a sincere attempt to understand a complex and unfathomable period of history. Winslet often chooses courageous, challenging parts and that award was well-deserved.
The musical number with Hugh Jackman & Beyonce' looked like someone forgot to take their ritalin.
I liked how they grouped the technical awards together. I appreciated their attempts to try something new with the award presentations.
Love Slumdog Millionaire!
Lord Karth
February 23, 2009 5:46 PM
The "Academy Awards" were last night ? And I should care about what a pack of overindulged menials playing at dress-up were doing....because ?
Your servant,
Lord Karth
lancelot lamar
February 23, 2009 7:01 PM
The memorial tribute honored Paul Newman most of all, and implicitly honored his conservative life. The appearance of Van Johnson, Richard Widmark, and Charleston Heston also reminded one of manly and courageous virtues. (Heston was badly treated; his tribute should have been as long as Newman's. No doubt his NRA presidency and his open Christian witness galled the hollywood establishment enough to give him short shrift.)
I know Newman was a conventional liberal democrat. But he was not self-righteous or annoying about it, he actually gave millions to charity instead of just whining for the government to help, and he was the husband of one wife his whole life long.
Your Name
February 23, 2009 8:55 PM
I used to enjoy watching the Oscars. And then I moved to the east coast, and watching it meant staying up way too late. And of course, I reached saturation with all the strident abuse of acceptance speeches as a bully pulpit for pet causes a loooong time ago.
This year, I can't think of a single thing LESS relevant to my life than the oscars: people I love have lost their jobs and/or watched their 401(k)s lose significant value. Some are barely holding onto their homes. And now I'm watching my father die. Watching a bunch of overdressed, self-enamored, faux-earnest, morally-challenged bobble-heads is just not high up on my list of must do's. Y'know?
Jen
February 23, 2009 9:01 PM
Lancelot - Paul Newman was married twice, not once. His marriage to his first wife for nearly a decade before divorced her and married Joanne Woodward.
Kit Stolz
February 23, 2009 9:08 PM
What Sacramento Bea said.
I liked the way the show took you through the making of a movie, beginning with the screenplay, which never has been shown better. Some of the presenting was a little turgid, but what else is new.
Ratings were up this year, probably because movies are surging in popularity, and because "Slumdog Millionaire" -- despite being shot in the slums of Mumbai -- has a lot of traditional Hollywood in it, including young love.
Your Name
February 23, 2009 9:42 PM
Ratings were up this year
Wasn't last year's Oscars the lowest rated ever?
Hmmm...this year's was the third lowest rated so you are correct.
If WALL-e had been up for best picture, I might have sat down for a few minutes, otherwise, no.
Thomas R
February 24, 2009 3:32 AM
"Slumdog Millionaire best score/best song writer's thanking of God for his blessings." Rachel
TR: Rahman is interesting in that, as I recall, he was raised Hindu became atheist than converted to Islam. He might be one of the tolerant mystical-type Muslims, but whatever it's nice to see someone say something nice about any Muslim here.
On a different matter I do think a tendency of the Oscars to hector us, and be so self-congratulatory, does start to get grating the older I get. It doesn't even matter if it's a cause I approve of or not. If one of them started giving a huge lecture about Aung San Suu Kyi or even the persecution of Christians in Iraq I could see myself sighing. There's sometimes too great a whiff of "look how great we are, look how we care about things, look what good people we are" when they do this. On top of that it goes long because of all these loving tributes to themselves and their own history. At this point I feel like just give us the awards and the speeches, stop telling us how great you think you are. Limit this frippery to significant anniversary editions. (The 50th, 75th, 100th, etc.) Although the memorial is good. Queen Latifah has a fairly good voice and I don't mind that segment.
Anyway as for the thing itself I find Kate Winslet sort-of likeable and charming. I liked her Dad whistling. Also some of the Hindi music was interesting.
Michele
February 24, 2009 4:35 AM
Didn't even know they were on last night. But I wouldn't have watched anyway, had I known.
Your Name
February 24, 2009 11:11 AM
Sean Penn called the audience/academy a bunch of homo-loving commies, or something to that effect, presumably because they voted for and/or cheered for his win.
Even though he sounded like a drug-addled cretin, on this one point he was, of course, more correct than he imagined.
In any case, Mickey Rourke should've gotten that particular Oscar, but it was given to Penn largely for P.C. reasons, and as a way to make up for passing up the gay cowboy movie from a couple years ago.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
I was pretty jazzed to see all those Bollywood folks. (Anil Kapoor, wooooo!!!) Otherwise I really didn't care.
Oh, and it was cool when Phillipe Petit balanced the oscar on his face.
It's nice that Winslet finally got the Oscar, but her performance in "The Reader" was very performance-y and I'm not at all surprised that Hathaway's excellent performance was looked over.
Also, Mickey Rourke should've won Best Actor. Bah. I've realized by now that mine and the Academy's definition of a good performance differ slightly.
I think it's perfect that Ross Douthat's favorite part of the Oscars is the "In Memoriam" montage. If Ross didn't really exist, Flannery O'Connor would have had to make him up.
The awards were a mixture of good and bad.
I found the strident, moralistic and intolerant gay sex activism of Sean Penn and that Milk writer very tiresome.
"I think that it is a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect, and anticipate their great shame, and the shame in their grandchildren's eyes if they continue that way of support. We've got to have equal rights for everyone.
And there are these last 2 things. I'm very, very proud to live in a country that is willing to elect an elegant man President."
Sean Penn, acceptance speech
"But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families, that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value, and that no matter what anyone tells you God does love you and that very soon I promise you, you will have equal rights federally across this great nation of ours."
Dustin Lance Black, writer, Milk, acceptance speech
No wonder ordinary people aren't watching the Oscars, when they are tarred as bigots all the time.
JJ.
Moralistic and intolerant talk about the Pot calling the Kettle Black
Wow, I really need to be a more regular hawk of the obituary columns. Close to half of the actors profiled (Cy Charisse, Van Johnson, James Whitmore, etc.) I didn't even know had kicked in the past year.
But how does one set a Google Alert for that sort of thing? Easy to do (as I have) for the last living First World War veterans--there are less than a half dozen of them left. But how to cull hundreds of potential noteworthy names from the thousands of obituaries that run every day?
I can't work up much interest in an evening of moral preening from a group of people who are paid to make faces.
Thank you for posting the video. Had you seen it during the ceremony, you would have seen most of it from the perspective of those sitting in the furthest seat of the highest balcony. Even with a large screen TV, I couldn't read the names/ranks of those to whom the tribute was paid.
The only movie receiving nomination which I saw last year was Frost/Nixon, so I didn't have a dog in the hunt. I watch it for the red carpet and the theatricality of the whole thing. I liked the way the best and supporting actor/actress awards were presented - by having five prior award winners in each category pay tribute to each nominee before the winner was read. I didn't like the montage of other best picture films edited into the clip of each of the best picture nominees.
I liked the juxtaposition of Bill Maher's anti-God diatribe with the Slumdog Millionaire best score/best song writer's thanking of God for his blessings.
I rolled my eyes at Sean Penn's angry, vitriolic acceptance speech. I am sympathetic to gay people who want to live their lives but also sympathetic to religious conservatives who fear, rightly in my opinion, that legalized gay marriage will impact what the churches teach. I also cringed at de Niro's tribute to Penn in which he lauded Penn for meeting with foreign leaders. Saddam? Chavez? I'm willing to put my dislike of a star's politics aside and evaluate him or her on his or her work, but I don't want my nose rubbed in his/her politics.
I liked the set (and especially the Swarovski crystal curtain) and the placement of the orchestra onstage instead of in the pit.
I liked the Tina Fey/Steve Martin screen writers' segment and the fact that the presenters appeared to be sober.
I didn't like or get Ben Stiller's schtick which the audience seemed to think hilarious. It must've been an inside joke.
But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families...
...that they should join his good friends at the People's Temple. Free refreshments available!
Expecting people involved in "Milk" not to talk about gay rights and equality is like expecting people who make Holocaust films not to talk about anti-Semitism or a film about Dr. King not to talk about African American civil rights.
Harvey Milk is a martyr figure, assassinated by a religious right politician weeks after defeating an anti-gay initiative sponsored by religious conservatives in California. His life is the stuff that movies and movements are made of.
There has been some discussion that the reaction in the gay community to Prop 8 was fueled, in part, by the release of "Milk," 30 years after Milk's assassination at the hands of Dan White.
The Oscars are long, and watching them, even for film buffs like me, becomes a bit of a chore by around 10:30 p.m.
I'm not a big fan of Sean Penn the political activist, but Sean Penn the actor richly deserved the Best Actor award, and I thought his acceptance speech, which contained something of an apology for being such a pill, wasn't bad except for the close. "Milk" is a fine film, and those who haven't seen it really ought to do so, IMO.
I'm for equal rights for all, but I don't believe that attempting to shame those who believe differently is in any way the right approach.
I thought the new system of having 5 former winners in each acting category give a tribute to each nominee before the winner was named was very classy. Unfortunately, it's the kind of thing that quickly becomes stale, so I hope they don't make it a permanent feature of the Oscars. Still, it was nice to see terrific actors who weren't going to win (Frank Langella, and Richard Jenkins, and Josh Brolin, and Viola Davis, anyone?) get their due.
I love actors, and I love watching the celebrity audience reaction shots during the Oscars. Yes, there is a certain amount of self-congratulation and phoniness, but who cares? My life would be immeasurably less rich if it weren't for the movies. BTW, Rod, I also highly recommend "The Reader."
Hi, Rachel,
Ben Stiller was doing his best Joaquin Phoenix impression. If you have a chance to watch the video of Phoenix's recent appearance on David Letterman (which you should be able to view online) Stiller's schtick will make perfect sense.
Slumdog deserved every award it won. It is a wonderful film, especially for me having spent so much time in Mumbai. I almost spit out my drink on my first viewing as the first spoken word in the film is probably the filthiest Hindi/Urdu curse word around. And the Amitabh scene was one of the funniest and grossest things in any movie.
I was disappointed to see the award for Best Actor go to a political agenda, as opposed to Micky Rourke.
And, JJ is absolutely right.
Thanx, Alicia! I checked it out, and now I get it and understand why everybody else did, as well.
The best movie I saw this year wasn't nominated for anything. That was "Gran Torino": interesting meaningful story, excellent acting (including a very special young woman, a good original song (when there were only 3 even nominated for Oscar?.
It makes it hard to take the Oscars seriously as recognition of artistic achievement, and not just as a political forum.
Is anyone else having any trouble this site while using Mozilla Firefox as browzer?
Further to what Daniel said, if you expect a gay man who wins an Oscar for writing a screenplay about a gay politician not to bring up gay political issues in any way during his 45-second Oscar acceptance speech, you are headed for a lot of disappointment.
AML:
"Gran Torino" wasn't nominated for anything? That's surprising. I had the impression it had been nominated for something. My wife and I just saw it this last weekend and thought it very good -- one of the better movies we've seen in a while. The denouement was not only unexpected but also satisfying on many levels.
A minor point but probably of interest to some here: the Catholic priest, and religion generally, receives very sympathetic treatment in the film.
Sorry. The repeat post was inadvertent. I received some strange error the first time about "service not available" and thought my initial attempt failed.
AML and Barmy, for those who haven't seen "Gran Torino" yet, this is a SPOILERISH comment, but I thought this was a wonderful film.
My favorite part (to those who have seen the film) was the marvelous double "fake-out" and I won't say any more. You know what I mean if you've seen the film. Clint Eastwood has won at the Oscars too many times, I think the Academy overlooked this terrific performance mainly because he has won so many times.
JJ,
"I found the strident, moralistic and intolerant gay sex activism of Sean Penn and that Milk writer very tiresome."
As you are welcomed to do. However, many others of us found both of them a welcome breath of fresh air, not to mention the truth and reality of the situation.
"I think that it is a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect, and anticipate their great shame, and the shame in their grandchildren's eyes if they continue that way of support. We've got to have equal rights for everyone.
And there are these last 2 things. I'm very, very proud to live in a country that is willing to elect an elegant man President."
Sean Penn, acceptance speech
"But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families, that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value, and that no matter what anyone tells you God does love you and that very soon I promise you, you will have equal rights federally across this great nation of ours."
Dustin Lance Black, writer, Milk, acceptance speech
To which you reply, "No wonder ordinary people aren't watching the Oscars, when they are tarred as bigots all the time."
Neither person used the word "bigot" in their speeches. You even bothered to copy/paste their speeches for all the world to see and that word just isn't there. If you have to resort to falsehoods to make your point, you've already lost the battle. If you've read this blog for any time at all, you know exactly for whom that epithet is saved.
Meanwhile, I was happy to hear the word "shame" coonsidering what a hot topic shame has been on Rod's blog these past couple of weeks. Truth and justice ring out in both acceptance speeches, and I thank you for posting them.
Does anyone know to what Sean Penn was referring to when he mentioned "hate signs" on protestors outside the hall?
Yes, Barmy, I agree that the treatment of religion, the wide range of attitudes toward religion and the changes in the characters, all felt real and true. And the young priest was putstanding.
Gran Torino deserves a second viewing, more than some of the other films deserve a first.
Alicia: "Clint Eastwood has won at the Oscars too many times, I think the Academy overlooked this terrific performance mainly because he has won so many times."
It doesn't seem to have held them back in Meryl Streeps case, for one. And it wasn't just the performance, but also the story, the direction, production, and some of the music. His hand was in everything and bravura throughout. To not nominated and of these just underlines that something political is going on.
Sorry for not proofing. To not nominated and of these just underlines that something political is going on.
Should be "to not nominate any of these"
I didn't see Milk - but to describe those two speeches as "gay sex activism" is utterly moronic. I'm no fan of Sean Penn's sanctimonious demeanor - but Black's mildly political acceptance speech was reasonable and heartfelt.
I was happy to see Kate Winslet win for "The Reader." What a frustrating and compelling movie! That film is so interesting for its strengths, its flaws, its ambiguous resolution (What lesson did Hanna learn?) - a sincere attempt to understand a complex and unfathomable period of history. Winslet often chooses courageous, challenging parts and that award was well-deserved.
The musical number with Hugh Jackman & Beyonce' looked like someone forgot to take their ritalin.
I liked how they grouped the technical awards together. I appreciated their attempts to try something new with the award presentations.
Love Slumdog Millionaire!
The "Academy Awards" were last night ? And I should care about what a pack of overindulged menials playing at dress-up were doing....because ?
Your servant,
Lord Karth
The memorial tribute honored Paul Newman most of all, and implicitly honored his conservative life. The appearance of Van Johnson, Richard Widmark, and Charleston Heston also reminded one of manly and courageous virtues. (Heston was badly treated; his tribute should have been as long as Newman's. No doubt his NRA presidency and his open Christian witness galled the hollywood establishment enough to give him short shrift.)
I know Newman was a conventional liberal democrat. But he was not self-righteous or annoying about it, he actually gave millions to charity instead of just whining for the government to help, and he was the husband of one wife his whole life long.
I used to enjoy watching the Oscars. And then I moved to the east coast, and watching it meant staying up way too late. And of course, I reached saturation with all the strident abuse of acceptance speeches as a bully pulpit for pet causes a loooong time ago.
This year, I can't think of a single thing LESS relevant to my life than the oscars: people I love have lost their jobs and/or watched their 401(k)s lose significant value. Some are barely holding onto their homes. And now I'm watching my father die. Watching a bunch of overdressed, self-enamored, faux-earnest, morally-challenged bobble-heads is just not high up on my list of must do's. Y'know?
Lancelot - Paul Newman was married twice, not once. His marriage to his first wife for nearly a decade before divorced her and married Joanne Woodward.
What Sacramento Bea said.
I liked the way the show took you through the making of a movie, beginning with the screenplay, which never has been shown better. Some of the presenting was a little turgid, but what else is new.
Ratings were up this year, probably because movies are surging in popularity, and because "Slumdog Millionaire" -- despite being shot in the slums of Mumbai -- has a lot of traditional Hollywood in it, including young love.
Ratings were up this year
Wasn't last year's Oscars the lowest rated ever?
Hmmm...this year's was the third lowest rated so you are correct.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/23/sunday-ratings-academy-awards-up-from-last-years-record-low/13282
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/17/academy-awards-show-ratings/12818
If WALL-e had been up for best picture, I might have sat down for a few minutes, otherwise, no.
"Slumdog Millionaire best score/best song writer's thanking of God for his blessings." Rachel
TR: Rahman is interesting in that, as I recall, he was raised Hindu became atheist than converted to Islam. He might be one of the tolerant mystical-type Muslims, but whatever it's nice to see someone say something nice about any Muslim here.
On a different matter I do think a tendency of the Oscars to hector us, and be so self-congratulatory, does start to get grating the older I get. It doesn't even matter if it's a cause I approve of or not. If one of them started giving a huge lecture about Aung San Suu Kyi or even the persecution of Christians in Iraq I could see myself sighing. There's sometimes too great a whiff of "look how great we are, look how we care about things, look what good people we are" when they do this. On top of that it goes long because of all these loving tributes to themselves and their own history. At this point I feel like just give us the awards and the speeches, stop telling us how great you think you are. Limit this frippery to significant anniversary editions. (The 50th, 75th, 100th, etc.) Although the memorial is good. Queen Latifah has a fairly good voice and I don't mind that segment.
Anyway as for the thing itself I find Kate Winslet sort-of likeable and charming. I liked her Dad whistling. Also some of the Hindi music was interesting.
Didn't even know they were on last night. But I wouldn't have watched anyway, had I known.
Sean Penn called the audience/academy a bunch of homo-loving commies, or something to that effect, presumably because they voted for and/or cheered for his win.
Even though he sounded like a drug-addled cretin, on this one point he was, of course, more correct than he imagined.
In any case, Mickey Rourke should've gotten that particular Oscar, but it was given to Penn largely for P.C. reasons, and as a way to make up for passing up the gay cowboy movie from a couple years ago.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.