Crunchy Con

Against conservative nostalgia

Tuesday March 31, 2009

Categories: Agrariana

Caleb Stegall, stiffening our spines in the comboxes of this thread over at Front Porch Republic:

The sooner we are collectively disabused of the notion that all we need is more book (or 'net) larnin', the sooner we'll be off our cushion and out the door. You want to farm. Great, so farm. Start small. What you lack isn't knowledge, but skill. Go talk to some locals. I recommend the feed store as a near infinite source of local knowledge and wisdom (which, by the way, is exactly where the old timers told me what I'm telling you now). Financially, stay out of debt, don't buy stuff you don't need, and learn how to work hard.

I have no patience for those who blame the world or the age we live in or the flood of Progress for their failure to have the life they supposedly want. This victim mentality is even uglier in conservative nostalgics (and I say that as one who is intimately familiar with the emotion). It needs to be ruthlessly dealt with. The worst thing that can happen to gatherings like FPR is that they have a tendency to become a place for parlor dress-up mind games for spoiled misfits each nursing their own grievances. A kind of virtual second life for conservatives who get to imagine the world they want without engaging in any of the real work, sacrifice, pain, and suffering that is required to attain the real thing. If preventing that hurts a few feelings, so be it.

You have bootstraps. So use 'em.

Advertisement
Comments
Russ
March 31, 2009 9:06 PM

In agreement with forestwalker, and even more so with Son of Okies. Stegall's act is wearing thin. I can just imagine what those locals say about him when he finally shuts up and leaves the feed store.

Badger
March 31, 2009 9:16 PM

Two years ago I was looking seriously into establishing a homestead. I am no longer. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Small farmers are leaving farming in droves. One can think of them as idiots and trust one's own wisdom or one can try to understand. For us, the realization finally came that you can't poor yourself to wealth. Watching your expenses are important indeed, but revenue and income matter too. I'm not going to begrudge him for his hobby farm, but it is just that. If it makes him happy so be it, although smoking is probably a cheaper hobby. And while I certainly respect Salatan, he pulls in $10,000 for each speaking engagement. Don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with being a public speaker. There's also nothing wrong with Sheets doing real estate seminars.

stefanie
March 31, 2009 9:29 PM

Hi, Badger: I don't begrudge people their hobby farms - as long as one person has a viable job (i.e. out of it they can pay the taxes, any legally required insurance, and keep their children from neglect), a small farm can for many be a wonderful hobby. Look at how much money people spend (or, well, spent) on cruises, extreme sports, expensive extracurriculars for kids like hockey, etc. At least with a hobby farm you get exercise, fresh air, vegetables, maybe some honey or even goat milk. As long as the member of the couple who stays at home enjoys it, what's not to like? We don't do it because my husband isn't interested, but I can see the appeal. You're right, though, for the vast majority it *will* be a hobby, not a means of making a living wage.

Clare Krishan
April 1, 2009 8:35 AM

Matthew Lickona hits the nail on the head with nostalgia: its a form of that kinda Manichean sentimentality described best -- as Flannery O'Connor channels Augustine -- here:

"the average Catholic reader ... forgets that sentimentality is an excess, a distortion of sentiment usually in the direction of an overemphasis on innocence, and that innocence, whenever it is overemphasized in the ordinary human condition, tends by some natural law to become its opposite. We lost our innocence in the Fall, and our return to it is through the Redemption which was brought about by Christ's death and by our slow participation in it. Sentimentality is a skipping of this process in its concrete reality and an early arrival at a mock state of innocence, which strongly suggests its opposite. Pornography, on the other hand, is essentially sentimental, for it leaves out the connection of sex with its hard purpose, and so far disconnects it from its meaning in life as to make it simply an experience for its own sake."
H/T http://www.matthewlickona.com/blog/blog.html

That's what I can't abide in the writing of Peggy Noonan, or those who would make a cottage industry out of beatifying Reagan, like Mr & Mrs Gingrich Bonny Jindal and their ilk. Faithful Christians all but dangerously deluded about what that means for human action, with their preference re: 'other peoples families' of the collectivism of politics and a total lack of respect for the real family's economic individuality (all are for using inflation - aka monetization of public debt -- as a policy tool). They favor moral hazard for the masses, stealing from taxpayers to keep their influential friends in power. That kind of conservativism isn't a virtue, its a vice, "enemies domestic" I think the inaugural pledge terms it...

Jon W
April 5, 2009 8:52 PM

My dad's favorite joke is about the farmer who won the lottery. They asked him what he was going to do with the money. He said, "Well. I guess I'll keep fahmin' till it's all gone."

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.