Crunchy Con

Meacham on post-Christian America

Sunday April 5, 2009

In the new issue of Newsweek, Jon Meacham explores the decline of Christianity as the animating spirit of American life. Excerpts:


Let's be clear: while the percentage of Christians may be shrinking, rumors of the death of Christianity are greatly exaggerated. Being less Christian does not necessarily mean that America is post-Christian. A third of Americans say they are born again; this figure, along with the decline of politically moderate-to liberal mainline Protestants, led the ARIS authors to note that "these trends ... suggest a movement towards more conservative beliefs and particularly to a more 'evangelical' outlook among Christians." With rising numbers of Hispanic immigrants bolstering the Roman Catholic Church in America, and given the popularity of Pentecostalism, a rapidly growing Christian milieu in the United States and globally, there is no doubt that the nation remains vibrantly religious--far more so, for instance, than Europe.

Still, in the new NEWSWEEK Poll, fewer people now think of the United States as a "Christian nation" than did so when George W. Bush was president (62 percent in 2009 versus 69 percent in 2008). Two thirds of the public (68 percent) now say religion is "losing influence" in American society, while just 19 percent say religion's influence is on the rise. The proportion of Americans who think religion "can answer all or most of today's problems" is now at a historic low of 48 percent. During the Bush 43 and Clinton years, that figure never dropped below 58 percent.

Many conservative Christians believe they have lost the battles over issues such as abortion, school prayer and even same-sex marriage, and that the country has now entered a post-Christian phase. Christopher Hitchens --a friend and possibly the most charming provocateur you will ever meet--wrote a hugely popular atheist tract a few years ago, "God Is Not Great." As an observant (if deeply flawed) Episcopalian, I disagree with many of Hitchens's arguments--I do not think it is productive to dismiss religious belief as superstitious and wrong--but he is a man of rigorous intellectual honesty who, on a recent journey to Texas, reported hearing evangelical mutterings about the advent of a "post-Christian" America.

More:

Which is precisely what most troubles [Southern Baptist theologian Al] Mohler. "The post-Christian narrative is radically different; it offers spirituality, however defined, without binding authority," he told me. "It is based on an understanding of history that presumes a less tolerant past and a more tolerant future, with the present as an important transitional step." The present, in this sense, is less about the death of God and more about the birth of many gods. The rising numbers of religiously unaffiliated Americans are people more apt to call themselves "spiritual" rather than "religious." (In the new NEWSWEEK Poll, 30 percent describe themselves this way, up from 24 percent in 2005.)

Roughly put, the Christian narrative is the story of humankind as chronicled in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament--the drama of creation, fall and redemption. The orthodox tend to try to live their lives in accordance with the general behavioral principles of the Bible (or at least the principles they find there of which they approve) and anticipate the ultimate judgment of God--a judgment that could well determine whether they spend eternity in heaven or in hell.

... "The moral teachings of Christianity have exerted an incalculable influence on Western civilization," Mohler says. "As those moral teachings fade into cultural memory, a secularized morality takes their place. Once Christianity is abandoned by a significant portion of the population, the moral landscape necessarily changes. For the better part of the 20th century, the nations of Western Europe led the way in the abandonment of Christian commitments. Christian moral reflexes and moral principles gave way to the loosening grip of a Christian memory. Now even that Christian memory is absent from the lives of millions."

Read the whole piece. There's a lot of talk about the error conservative Christians made in thinking that politics was the best, or at least a sufficient, way of halting and reversing the advance of post-Christian America. I think this is entirely correct. It ends with Al Mohler making a sobering -- and again, an entirely correct -- observation that we don't know what's going to come next, as the post-Christian identity of the US begins to gel, but we can know for sure that it's going to be very different from what came before.

The other day, a Christian friend suggested to me that perhaps I am so gloomy about the future for traditional Christians because I work in the media, and am surrounded by so many signs of decline. He suggested that maybe my view is distorted. And he had a point. But it's also possible that his view is distorted by the fact that he lives in a fairly strongly Christian milieu. Generally speaking, life in Dallas is far more congenial toward public Christianity than anywhere else I've lived. This is, relatively speaking, a socially conservative city. Dallas is, in my experience, significantly out of step with the rest of the country in those terms. This is one reason (probably the main one) why I like living here, but it is what it is, and anyway, Dallas is not an island (it surprises people to learn that politically, Dallas County went Democratic a couple of election cycles ago; as a purely political matter, George W. Bush now lives in Blue America).

I strongly believe that traditional Christians need to read the signs of the times, and soberly to assess where we stand today, and figure out how we and our children are to live in a political and cultural order ever more alien and hostile to what we know to be true. This is not the end of the world, but it's the end of a world, and we should get that straight in our minds, and prepare for how to live as Christians in it. You can read some of the comments on various threads in this blog -- well, you could have read them if you got to them before I deleted them -- and seen flashing rage at traditional Christians, and in that a presentiment of what I believe is going to become more common, though probably in a milder form (at least at first), as the years and decades pass. I see no prospect of this being turned around in the near long term, which is another way of saying it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better. Better to get that learnt right now, and soberly make spiritual preparation. Which could include this:


It is always dangerous to draw too precise parallels between one historical period and another; and among the more misleading of such parallels are those which have been drawn between our own age ... and the epoch in which the Roman Empire declined into the Dark Ages. Nonetheless certain parallels there are. ... A crucial turning point in that earlier history occurred when men and women of good will turned aside from the task of shoring up the Roman imperium and ceased to identify the continuation of civility and moral community with the maintenance of that imperium. What they set themselves to achieve - often not recognizing fully what they were doing - was the construction of new forms of community within which the moral life could be sustained so that both morality and civility might survive the coming ages of barbarism and darkness. If my account of our moral condition is correct, we ought also to conclude that for some time now we too have reached that turning point. ... This time, however, the barbarians are not waiting beyond the frontiers, they have already been governing us for quite some time. And it is our lack of consciousness of this that constitutes part of our predicament. We are not waiting for Godot, but for another - and doubtless very different - St. Benedict.

That was, as regular readers know, from Alasdair MacIntyre's "After Virtue." As I pointed out in this post from a while back, it's unreasonable to expect to live as orthodox Christians in a social context that maximizes individual liberty and evacuates the concept of virtue of transcendent meaning. In post-Christian America, only in small community can this be accomplished. This is what I mean by all my talk of "the Benedict Option." Think about it.

Advertisement
Comments
TTT
April 6, 2009 10:14 AM

Simply getting rid of the 1964 "Civil Rights" Act (the source of a great deal of evil !) would go a long ways

Wow. And what's more, wow.

After that, let's have no more complaints about how unfair it is for SSM-advocates to compare anti-gay discrimination to anti-black discrimination.

In conclusion, wow.

sigaliris
April 6, 2009 11:10 AM

I'm with you, TTT. My father lived in a small town where black people were forbidden to reside. They made an exception for one guy, who ran a lawn service and did chores. All other black persons might enter the city limits to work, but had to be out of town by sundown. By Karth's standards, that was perfectly okay. If black people didn't like it, they could just move to some other state. Or country. Or planet.

Speaking of which, hey Karth, I hear Elizabeth Claire Prophet's Church Universal and Triumphant has a very large fallout shelter in Montana. Maybe you could go there in lieu of a catacomb.

Thomas R
April 6, 2009 12:02 PM

"After that, let's have no more complaints about how unfair it is for SSM-advocates to compare anti-gay discrimination to anti-black discrimination." TTT

TR: One guy gets to define everyone else or all arguments? That seems rather ridiculous.

Anti-gay discrimination simply is not like anti-black discrimination. A black celibate guy under Jim Crow who took pains to speak "The King's English" would still be restricted in voting, jobs, education, and sometimes even medical attention. When you have to pay a tax to vote maybe you can make this absurd comparison. Someone on a combox being an idiot? Not so much.

Anti-gay is more like Anti-Semitism. Jews could stop being all "Jewy", convert to Christianity, and lose most impediments. Disraeli got to be PM of the UK and other Christians of Jewish ancestry did alright. Even Jews who stayed with Judaism could vote, go to most any school, etc in this country. They were "merely" seen by many as culturally elite types who'd warp the morality of young minds and were inimical to the health of a Christian nation.

However most any protection I'd grant to Jews, or Hindus or Baha'is, I'd grant to gays. Just no more than that.

David Murdoch
April 8, 2009 2:44 PM
http://www.eloquentbooks.com/AnaMarkovic.html

I've never lived in the United States, and even with the difficulties that the christian culture is facing there, I find it amazing how strongly and successfully people have been resisting some of the trends that are hostile to the conservative values (eg. the reversing of gay marriage in california after the last election). I live in Canada and we have five major political parties, and not one of them is pro-life...

I don't think we really need to be worried though. God will be our protection and He will let His people be persecuted, but never more than we can sustain. Jesus was powerless on the cross, but in that powerlessness He overcame evil. If we hold fast to what we know is right and endure what afflictions may come, we will triumph over evil through Our Lord's victory on the cross. We can't see it at the moment, and it seems foolish perhaps, but we may have hope.

Romans 8:24-25 For in this hope we were saved. Now hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.

C. Prince
April 13, 2009 4:44 PM

Your awareness needs sharpening. This America is not Post-Christian. It is Post Religion. That is no small distinction. When religionists routinely ignore Jesus, rush to judgment about reproductive and sexual identity issues, show themselves to be unrelenting hypocrites, or fight all different worldviews as political or cultural "battles" and "wars," their days are numbered.

No one denigrates the founders of religions, just the religionists who oppress others with their misinterpretations, denials and malpractice.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.