Demographer Nicholas Eberstadt reports that Russia is literally drinking itself into oblivion. Aside from the collapsing birth rate Excerpt:
No literate and urban society in the modern world faces a risk of deaths from injuries comparable to the one that Russia experiences.Russia's patterns of death from injury and violence (by whatever provenance) are so extreme and brutal that they invite comparison only with the most tormented spots on the face of the planet today. The five places estimated to be roughly in the same league as Russia as of 2002 were Angola, Burundi, Congo, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. To go by its level of mortality injury alone, Russia looks not like an emerging middle-income market economy at peace, but rather like an impoverished sub-Saharan conflict or post-conflict society.
Taken together, then, deaths from cardiovascular disease and from injuries and poisoning have evidently been the main drivers of modern Russia's strange upsurge in premature mortality and its broad, prolonged retrogression in public health conditions. One final factor that is intimately associated with both of these causes of mortality is alcohol abuse.
Unlike drinking patterns prevalent in, say, Mediterranean regions--where wine is regarded as an elixir for enhancing conversation over meals and other social gatherings, and where public drunkenness carries an embarrassing stigma--mind-numbing, stupefying binge drinking of hard spirits is an accepted norm in Russia and greatly increases the danger of fatal injury through falls, traffic accidents, violent confrontations, homicide, suicide, and so on. Further, extreme binge drinking (especially of hard spirits) is associated with stress on the cardiovascular system and heightened risk of CVD mortality.
How many Russians are actually drinkers, and how heavily do they actually drink? Officially, Russia classifies some 7 million out of roughly 120 million persons over 15 years of age, or roughly 6 percent of its adult population, as heavy drinkers. But the numbers are surely higher than this. According to data compiled by the World Health Organization, as of 2003 Russia was Europe's heaviest per capita spirits consumer; its reported hard liquor consumption was over four times as high as Portugal's, three times that of Germany or Spain, and over two and a half times higher than that of France.
Yet even these numbers may substantially understate hard spirit use in Russia, since the WHO figures follow only the retail sale of hard liquor. But samogon--home-brew, or "moonshine"--is, according to some Russian researchers, a huge component of the country's overall intake. Professor Alexander Nemstov, perhaps Russia's leading specialist in this area, argues that Russia's adult population--women as well as men--puts down the equivalent of a bottle of vodka per week.
Eberstadt points out that while European nations are suffering similar collapses in population, and a rise in illegitimate births, they live in prosperity, with strong guarantees of material care for their populations. Not so in Russia. Putin's ambitions for Russia's resurrection don't factor in the disastrous fact that there won't be enough people around to accomplish what he hopes for.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Steph
Nowhere in that article was there mention of the effect on the nation of all those institutionalized, drug and alcohol exposed children. I'm raising 4 adopted kids with Fetal Alcohol syndrome.
Amen, Steph. I was going to mention the FAS crisis in Russia, but there was so much to say one can't fit it all in. God bless you for your work.
One more thing forgotten in this article: many, many women in Russia are infertile due to past abortion, so even if they wanted to have kids many can't.
The rejection of tradition for progressivism is truly a crime against children, who bear the brunt of the "new way".
Maybe having your country's assets strip mined by decidedly non-ethnic Russian oligarchs under the cover of 'neoliberalism' and 'shock therapy' has something to do with it. But I really think this 'Russia is dying' is old news. The 'nationalists' Putin and Medvyedev are just about the only whi... I mean European leaders that have expressed any concern for demographics of their co-ethnics and have done so things to correct the problem -- so far minimal but even that seems to be having an effect.
See, for example this article
http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1068513.html
Note the headline, which sends a negative message about Putin's attempts to increase the birthrate, contrasting with the actually quite positive comments by some of the actual Russian mothers. Strange that.
And here's some good news, especially for Caucasians and the Orthodox
Church leader sparks Georgian baby boom
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7964302.stm
How doomed is Russia?
- declining marriage rates with rising divorce
- spread of cohabitation as alternative to marriage
- delayed age at marriage
- sub-replacement fertility
- third world disease levels
- drinking to the point of death
- abortion outnumbering births
- endless FAS
- time-bomb of ethinc strife, with Muslims breathing down their neck on one side and many, many other enemies (built up over nearly 100 years of bullying others) just wanting to get a chance at revenge.
I strongly doubt Ruassia can ever flip to “traditional” family patterns and more children after Communism in time to pull out of their demographic hole. There is simply no reason to think that in Russia can survive, period.
Why? Because Russia is the ultimate liberal utopia: declining marriage, lots of drugs and booze, cohabitation, women working, few children, and topping it off with an anti-God, all-powerful nanny state. Thus she is doomed, as is any culture wishing to follow this lead.
Yes, we can!
Re :This is one reason why Russian women (i.e. the "babushkas") have a reputation for being so strong and intense - because they had to become matriarchs in caring for their families. The husbands were too demoralized to be stong parents.
Sounds a lot like the dysfunctional dynamic that is at work in the American underclass too.
Re: It's really a simple equation: Progressives = modern Russia
I was with you until this part. Equating American liberals to Stalinists is every bit as absurd as when leftists equated the Bush admninistration to Hitler and the Nazis.
Re: The Patriarch might want to take a page from the successful pro-natalist policy of Patriarch Ilia II of the
Georgian Orthodox Church, as detailed here:
The problem isn't so much the birth rate (though that is a problem). It's the death rate.
Re: as I see it the "post-industrial equilibrium population" of Europe is in fact extremely small compared to its current population. In fact, it may be as little as 10 million in all of Europe.
Ridiculous. Europe supported several times that number even with the primitive technology of the Roman Empire. Unless the climate turns really cold (a possibility if the Gulf Streanm shuts down) I would think Europe could support at least as many people as dwelt there in the early 20th century before mechanized agriculture became the norm.
Re "I would think Europe could support at least as many people as dwelt there in the early 20th century before mechanized agriculture became the norm" I am not saying it could not.
What I am saying is that economics would allow it to support a very small population for the reasons of the low competitiveness of its sole natural resource. Urbanisation and especially tourism serve to make family formation unaffordable without the value children have in a (relatively) self-sufficient agricultural society.
My estimate is based on how low Europe's population density would need to be for it to have farming as labour-efficient as is possible on the vast plains of Australia. What might happen in the more mountainous regions on a free market is still worse because in these regions the free market encourages dependence on tourism. Dependence on tourism is certainly in these low-fragility environments anti-human. Land that is of almost no value in species diversity or resource protection is taken from ordinary people to develop accommodation and other services, with the result that even if they gain money from the tourists, locals lose a lot more in higher prices for housing and other essential goods, weakening family ties, and a culture that loses the restraint on materialism provided in traditional mountain farming cultures by marianismo.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.