Crunchy Con

Was there a way to address this? (Erin)

Tuesday June 9, 2009

Categories: International

We talked here the other day about President Obama' speech in Cairo; most of us saw it as a positive thing for the most part, and certainly the wish for peace in the Middle East is shared by everyone here.

But Andre Aciman, writing an op-ed in the New York Times, found an aspect of the speech less than stellar:

And yet, for all the president's talk of "a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world" and shared "principles of justice and progress," neither he nor anyone around him, and certainly no one in the audience, bothered to notice one small detail missing from the speech: he forgot me.


The president never said a word about me. Or, for that matter, about any of the other 800,000 or so Jews born in the Middle East who fled the Arab and Muslim world or who were summarily expelled for being Jewish in the 20th century. With all his references to the history of Islam and to its (questionable) "proud tradition of tolerance" of other faiths, Mr. Obama never said anything about those Jews whose ancestors had been living in Arab lands long before the advent of Islam but were its first victims once rampant nationalism swept over the Arab world.

Nor did he bother to mention that with this flight and expulsion, Jewish assets were -- let's call it by its proper name -- looted. Mr. Obama never mentioned the belongings I still own in Egypt and will never recover. My mother's house, my father's factory, our life in Egypt, our friends, our books, our cars, my bicycle. We are, each one of us, not just defined by the arrangement of protein molecules in our cells, but also by the things we call our own. Take away our things and something in us dies. Losing his wealth, his home, the life he had built, killed my father. He didn't die right away; it took four decades of exile to finish him off.

Mr. Obama had harsh things to say to the Arab world about its treatment of women. And he said much about America's debt to Islam. But he failed to remind the Egyptians in his audience that until 50 years ago a strong and vibrant Jewish community thrived in their midst. Or that many of Egypt's finest hospitals and other institutions were founded and financed by Jews. It is a shame that he did not remind the Egyptians in the audience of this, because, in most cases -- and especially among those younger than 50 -- their memory banks have been conveniently expunged of deadweight and guilt. They have no recollections of Jews.


I'm sympathetic to Aciman's story. But I don't think, given the audience President Obama was speaking to, that he could have brought up the subject of the Jewish expulsion from Arab countries in a way that wouldn't have provoked anger among those listening. That doesn't mean the issue should be ignored; but could the president really have made any reference to this situation, giving the location and circumstances surrounding his speech?

Advertisement
Comments
California #1!
June 10, 2009 3:32 AM

BobN -

1) The Palestinians had somewhere to go too - they could have become citizens of other Arab countries, but have been purposely restricted to refugee status for the last 60 years so the Arab governments could use them as political pawns against Israel. There were other cases of population transfers in those times - in Turkey, Pakistan, Germany, and others - and all of those were accepted and life went on. An unacknowledged fault here lies with the Arab governments who invaded Israel, then prolonged the suffering of the Palestinians.

2) The Jews in the Muslim world may not have been persecuted to the extent they were in the West, but they had a hard time of it. As in the West, they were a tolerated but despised minority, treated as second class citizens and subject to humiliation, not to mention being occasional victims of pogroms and riots. They were in a precarious position and made easy targets when the Muslim population was angry. You should read about the situation of Jews in the Maghreb or Yemen a century ago. It's quite ugly. The story we hear about Muslims being tolerant of Jews has some validity, but in the same way that you could validly claim that Bahais are tolerated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_under_Muslim_rule

Bill
June 10, 2009 12:52 PM

"Could someone please explain our nation's compelling interest in the Palestinian / Israeli issue?"

I am sympathetic to TM's concern. For almost five decades now, the American taxpayer has been footing much of the bill for efforts to "solve the Middle Eastern crisis." Partly as a result of America's involvement in that search for a solution, Americans both at home and abroad have been targeted by the combatants (usually backers of the Palestinians, but in some instances also by the Israelis). We have plenty of problems here in the U.S. Maybe its time that we leave the Palestinians and Israelis to solve their own problems.

BobN
June 10, 2009 1:16 PM

they could have become citizens of other Arab countries

By whose authority? Under whose orders? The Arab countries were no more obligated to absorb the Palestinians who left Palestine than we were.

"The Jews in the Muslim world may not have been persecuted to the extent they were in the West, but they had a hard time of it." That was my point. And that Obama's comments covered that situation, as well.

TM
June 10, 2009 1:35 PM

Dharmashaiva said:
June 9, 2009 9:23 PM
http://oca.org/
TM, been down South, much?

I'm not sure I follow. But, as for the question, I've lived in Georgia (USA) for 42 years.

California #1!
June 10, 2009 7:54 PM

BobN - They have more obligations than we do according to their own view, because they are fellow Arabs and Muslims. It makes basic sense for Arab countries to absorb Arabs, just as Germany absorbed Germans, Greece absorbed Greeks, and so on. In another, humanitarian sense they should have allowed them to become citizens instead of living as refugees for 60 years. To put it in another way, what would you say if we had hosted Palestinian refugees in America for 60 years, but never allowed them the rights and status of full citizens? If we had kept them living in camps all those decades and discriminated against them economically? I think we would all consider it a human and civil rights issue.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.