Crunchy Con

Evangelical culture in America

Sunday July 12, 2009

Categories: Culture, Evangelicals

I am an admirer of Evangelicals and Evangelicalism. I don't share their culture, nor do I share their theological worldview. But we have so very much in common, and I consider them to be friends and allies. But because so much of American Christianity, at least in my part of the world, is Evangelical Christianity, it is difficult to take critical notice of trends in American religious life without looking at Evangelicals. I say this to get it straight from the outset of this comment that any criticism implicit herein is criticism that comes from a friend -- and not, let me be clear, from a position of Orthodox triumphalism. A dear friend of mine left his Greek Orthodox church for Evangelicalism decades ago because he was desperate for an experience of the living Christ, and was tired of church life being a musty museum of Hellenism. I won't let the thread be hijacked by people who want only to beat up on Evangelicals.

That said, here goes.

On Friday afternoon, I drove with a couple of Orthodox church friends out to a youth retreat we held at a parishioner's lake house. As we were driving through one suburb, I pointed to a particular megachurch, and told a story about how a young Evangelical friend decided he'd had enough of that place, and megachurch Christianity, on the day he was watching the Jumbotron-esque screen behind the stage/altar, and they were broadcasting "Live" (according to the crawl on the screen) from a chapel elsewhere in the building, a baptism. The whole idea of church as multimedia event turned his stomach.

My friends in the car both came to Orthodoxy out of Evangelicalism. They got to talking about the praise-and-worship music they left behind. I, who have no experience of Evangelicalism, mentioned something a young Evangelical in Colorado wisecracked to me: that she is pretty fed up with "all this 'I want to make out with my boyfriend Jesus' music." Her point was that too much of the Evangelical worship experience was about building an intensely emotional bond with Jesus Christ. It seemed disordered to her. A former Evangelical who was part of that conversation told me that if I listen closely to the lyrics of many of those praise-and-worship songs, I'll hear a constant refrain of Self. E.g., "Here I stand at the Cross, Lord..." "Jesus, you do so much for me..." "I, I, I, me, me, me."

Again, I have exactly zero experience of this, but when I relayed this observation to my ex-Evangelical friends in the car, they both agreed with that assessment. One of my buddies even said it made him angry to hear that sort of worship music today.

We talked for a bit about how this highly emotional, self-centered approach to God goes hand-in-hand with Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, which is to say the trend among American teenagers to eschew doctrine and dogma in favor of a bland, undemanding, formless deity who has very little in common with historic Christianity. One of my friends, a high school teacher in a private (non-religious) institution, said a philosophical discussion in one of his classes recently turned into a conversation about Christian beliefs. These kids -- who are mostly from privileged families -- had no idea that Christianity taught that Jesus was God ("Isn't that something Mormons believe?" said one). He went on recalling how gobsmacked he was by the sheer ignorance of basic Christianity these kids had -- and this, in a culture that purports to be Christian. They didn't even know enough about Christianity to reject it.

Now, these kids weren't Evangelicals, or at least my friend didn't indicate that they were. But I understood him to say that we older Christians may deeply underestimate how much ground we've lost with the younger generation in this therapeutic post-Christian culture. As my friend put it, "We've spent so much time and energy trying to be 'relevant' to teenagers that we've not given them the basics."

How to effectively address this crisis, which affects all American churches today? Many of us from older liturgical traditions sometimes look with envy on all the cultural energy and enthusiasm (and numbers!) Evangelicals manage. But listening to my ex-Evangelical friends talk about what they lived through -- and these men were by no means embittered ex-Evangelicals -- made me, an outsider, wonder if all the activity in Evangelical megachurches really is as lasting or as meaningful as it seems from the outside. But it also makes me wonder how Orthodoxy, traditional-minded Roman Catholicism and more historic iterations of Protestant Christianity, can effectively reach a technophilic culture that forms souls according to emotive, therapeutic principles.

Thoughts?

UPDATE: I should say that speaking at the youth retreat, sitting out under the stars with some of the boys from our parish (junior high to early high school age), a fear came over me that I sounded like an old fart, easily dismissed, and so did the rest of us older guys. We were all speaking to the young guys without condescension, telling them real-life stories of wisdom hard-won about the kind of courage it takes to be a man and to resist temptations to drugs, sex and the blandishments of the crowd. I knew that everything I said to those boys was true, because I'd lived it. And I have faith that everything the other men said to them was also true. None of it seemed to be canned self-help crap, but the useful truth. And yet, were I sitting there as a 12 or 13 year old, how would I have heard it? Would it have been more blabbity-blah-blah from adults?

Probably.

Maybe the real service there is, as Jesse said today, simply spending time with these boys and forming relationships that will encourage them not to look to us for didactic moral instruction, but simply for personal counseling and even friendship of the sort that will accomplish indirectly what more direct instruction cannot easily do without sounding like a bunch of Wards sitting around telling Wally and Beaver what not to do.

Advertisement
Comments
Brennan
July 15, 2009 9:41 PM

Davis wrote:

"Arguably, people who yearn for the "bells and smells and chanting" are operating on a certain level of emotionalism (or even nostalgia). They can talk all they want about TRADITION, but ultimately tradition's accoutraments are about emotion. The chanting is about emotion. The bells and smells are about emotion. Hearing the mass in Latin is about emotion. Iconography is emotion. Tradition is both an intellectual and emotional experience, as well as spiritual."

Davis, first of all, thanks for elucidating to me why I prefer the Gregorian rite (traditional Latin Mass); I hadn't realized that. I thought my reasons went far beyond emotion to doctrinal strength, beauty, reverence, and a sacred atmosphere which may or may not involve one's emotions.

And of course there's the small point that no one I read argues for the Gregorian rite on that basis. Not Dietrich von Hildbrand in his "The Case for the Latin Mass":

http://www.latin-mass-society.org/dietrich.htm

Cardinal Ottaviani wasn't doing it with the Ottaviani Intervention:

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1969ottoviani.html

And certainly not Martin Mosebach in the the "Heresy of Formlessness":

http://www.amazon.com/Heresy-Formlessness-Martin-Mosebach/dp/1586171275/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1247708211&sr=8-1

I invite you to read any or all of these works so that you no longer write what you did, it really sounds rather ridiculous.

Houghton
July 16, 2009 2:51 PM

Fascinating discussion. As someone who currently attends an Evangelical nondenominational church, and has been on the fence about these issues over the past year, I can't think of a single thing to disagree with in Rod's original post.

The therapeutic, self-interested focus is definitely there -- especially in the praise music and the worship "experience."

This is taking place in both large megachurch settings and in smaller house church settings (which were presumably formed to get away from that very thing in megachurch arenas).

Also, the creeping influence of Pentecostalism and neo-charismatics on Evangelicals at large is leading to an incredible amount of muddy-headed theological thinking that I think will continue to damage people's faith.

There's an entire wave of "prophetic evangelism" sweeping across much of nondenominational American Christianity right now, and it's merely a re-branding of the "signs and wonders" and "Word of Faith" movements from the past few decades.

Houghton
July 16, 2009 3:04 PM

One thing I would add to the discussion here is the increasingly repetitive nature of the praise music in many evangelical settings now. There's a striking difference between Protestant hymns from 100 or 200 years ago, which are theologically complex and Scripturally-rooted, and praise music today.

Most of today's music is filled with repetitive refrain devices, which I've increasingly come to feel have the effect of being somewhat hypnotic, allowing participants to set aside critical faculties.

By contrast, singing an older hymn with attention can truly engage the mind and spirit at the same time.

Leave aside for a moment the vacuous nature of many of the refrains (for instance, I heard a song not long ago in which the worship leader kept referring to "heaven giving the earth a big, wet sloppy kiss") the repetitive nature of these songs is also, in my view, a serious flaw and indicative of the emptiness of much of it.

Brian David
July 16, 2009 3:31 PM

Hmm. I have seen a comment or two speaking of the purpose of such Orthodox 'accoutrements' as icons and chant being the development of a certain 'emotion.' I really disagree with this assessment. The primary purpose of all the components of Orthodox worship is to provide a unified guidance in proper doctrine and worship. Take, for instance, one of the hymns I find most emotional during the Liturgy:

Only Begotten Son and Immortal Word of God,
Who for our salvation willed to be incarnate
of the holy Mother of God and ever-virgin Mary,
Who without change became man and wert crucified,
Who art one of the Holy Trinity
glorified with the Father and the Holy Spirit!
O Christ our God,
trampling down death by death, save us!

The way we chant this as a congregation during the Liturgy leads to emotions in me that I associate with awe and reverence. Our voices all collectively increase in volume at the mention of the Holy Trinity, and get even louder as a we sing "O Christ our God." The sort of rumbling quality of the "Who for our salvation willed to be incarnate" is sung in such a way that you know something is coming--in the same way that the incarnation of Christ leads us to a relationship with the Trinity. Now, in no way does the Orthodox Church try to prevent emotions during worship; however, isn't it clear from this hymn that it is not primarily to raise emotions but rather to present the Gospel succinctly and reverently?

Similarly with icons. It is clear from the 7th Ecumenical Council and the universal teaching of the Church that the primary purpose of icons is to proclaim the revolutionary truth that God is no longer 'formless' but has been incarnate as a Man. Thus, He can be portrayed. Even if one does not agree with this doctrine of icons, can one at least simply acknowledge that this is the Orthodox reason for them? In that case, even if icons by their beauty and content lead to certain prayerful emotions, this is not the PRIMARY intent.

Thus, even for the components of Orthodox worship which lead to certain emotions for many, these emotions are only a by-product of a method which is meant to present the Gospel and the doctrines of the Church very clearly. Emotion itself is neither rejected nor promoted. Rather, faith in the historic teachings of the Church is promoted. The Church's methods are intended to channel our various capacities-- including emotions-- down the same well-trodden path walked by the disciples and our Fathers and Mothers in the faith. Thus, if one is quite emotional, as long as he stays on the path forged by his Christian forebears, his emotions will be channeled and sanctified within the proper bounds. On the other hand, for one less emotionally-inclined, the path remains the same and is objectively presented for his feet as well.

mattw
July 17, 2009 3:32 AM
http://www.dinca.org

We need Star Trek not Jesus. ;)

Anyway, I doubt these kids, with their country club-- woops i mean school-- can tell me anything about Plato, can find Germany on a map, can tell me Newton's second law. Can they even name a musician from the 19th century?

They are *ignorant*. Not just of Christianity, of *everything*.

Oh wait, I mean everything not on Myspace or featured on Xbox.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.