Crunchy Con

Freedom, obedience and religious life

Tuesday July 14, 2009

Here's an important blog post by Steve Skojec, a Catholic friend of this blog who posts from time to time, about what he learned from his traumatizing time in the Legionaries of Christ. It's about how personal autonomy yielded to a religious superior can destroy a mind, and even a soul. Steve's testimony really is a must-read in its entirety, but here's an excerpt:

What I saw when I was on the inside was not just the fostering of dependence on superiors and spiritual directors, but a fostering of co-dependence. This leads to a deformation of conscience and will that all but completely strips individuals within the system of their ability to make independent, conscientious decisions.

Which is why, in my opinion, there are a number of Legionary seminarians - and even priests - who do not now, nor have ever had, a priestly vocation. I didn't have one, but that didn't stop superiors I loved and respected from telling me that they "knew" I had one. That kind of certitude in a system where the priests calling the shots are telling you "God's will" can be an insurmountable obstacle to young men (or women) discerning whether they are called to the religious life. And the Legionaries' frequent insistence that even those signs that would ordinarily be considered evidence of a different vocation (say, a strong desire for the married life) are nothing but further indications of God's call to ecclesiastical vows often seals the deal.

I spent many years trying to overcome the guilt I felt about following my heart instead of my superiors' and spiritual directors' wishes that I become a Legionary. Intense, gut-wrenching, faith-damaging guilt. And I was only in their clutches for a relatively short time. Imagine what happens to the boys who join them at the age of 12 or 13 and spend more than a decade in seminary.

I'll never forget one priest who was in charge of a large house of apostolate and school where I spent some time living in community as a layman. He told me that he was sure I had a vocation, and when I responded that I appreciated his assessment, but didn't want to be a priest, his response was stunning.

"Who said anything about wanting to be a priest? I didn't want to be a priest. I still don't want to be a priest. But if God wants it..."

I found this through Mark Shea, who adds his own interesting perspective. It seems clear to me that this whole Legionaries thing was a pretty sick operation that severely messed with the heads of thousands and thousands of good, faithful Catholics. But the problems of the Legionaries and their slavish devotion to ecclesial authority are hardly theirs alone. Mark alludes to a much milder version of this he experienced in an Evangelical church to which he belonged. There's nothing quite like listening to Evangelicals crack on Catholics for being Pope-bots, yet they themselves hang on to the words and thoughts given by the pastor du jour, or hot churchy book of the month. There is in Orthodoxy a highly superstitious sort of believer who will ask the priest for a "blessing" for every tiny thing, and for direction in extremely petty matters. I've read that in at least some Hasidic Jewish communities, the faithful view the Rebbe as a virtual oracle of the divine, and submit everything to his judgment.

I have been inspired by accounts I've read about Orthodox monastics, and the traditions they keep of obedience to a spiritual elder within the monastic community. But truth to tell, they also can unnerve me, for the same reasons that Steve Skojec raises in his piece. Having covered (and agonized over) the Catholic sex abuse scandal, and seen how decent people were manipulated by religious authority, and defended the indefensible out of a sincere belief that by standing up for religious authority, they were defending God himself, I am extremely wary of this sort of thing. I spent a long time back in the day on the phone with the brother of an older man who was in a particular Catholic monastery, and who had knowledge of criminal acts committed by the abbot and others in the monastery. According to the brother, the abbot was cracking down hard psychologically on his brother the monk, to get him to keep quiet and not go to the authorities. The monk's family was trying to convince him to go to the police, but the man, who was in his 50s, was so afraid that to do so would be to betray his brother monks and, in turn, the Lord Almighty, that he couldn't bring himself to do it. He even had a heart attack from all the stress. The monk was going to do an interview with me, but cancelled it. It was infuriating, and heartbreaking.

So when I read all these pious accounts of Orthodox monks putting their entire minds and souls into the hands of their elder, part of me thinks it's a beautiful thing, but mostly it scares me. If your elder is a holy and gentle man, you are in a great place to grow in holiness yourself. But if not? As Steve writes, "there is no power over people like religious power."

In the end, this speaks to the problem of authority in our culture. We cannot live without authority, in part because without authority, there is no stability. Yet we fear and resist authority, and not always out of self-centered rebellion. When I left Catholicism spiritually broken, I was grateful for Orthodoxy, but I knew that I could never again trust religious authority as uncritically as I once had done. Mind you, there's a difference between not recognizing legitimate authority, and not allowing oneself to be as devoted to serving those in the authority as others might be. I certainly recognize in principle the authority of the Orthodox Church. Nevertheless, once burned...

A final thought: if we are all our own popes and patriarchs, though, and refuse to yield to any authority but our own autonomous judgment, how are we to know when we are abusing and misleading ourselves? We have all known people who thought they were taking the right way down a religious or moral path, but it was obvious to anyone with a lick of sense that they were self-deluded, and would come to ruin unless they listened to their priest, their pastor or someone with spiritual wisdom and authority. Maybe we've been that person. Maybe we might yet be.

Advertisement
Comments
Jillian
July 15, 2009 6:14 PM

And who is your master, Jillian? Like the man sang, gotta serve somebody. If you say, "Me, myself and I," then on the basis of the positions you take on this blog, I can't say that I find the leadership all that reliable.

Oh, Rod! LOL!

Love, Rod. Love. The hardest and gentlest master of them all. A master you seem to find extraordinarily disagreeable.

Fr. Hans Jacobse
July 15, 2009 10:48 PM
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org

About two years ago a monk came to see me about an abusive and controlling abbot. He was torn between his vow of obedience and the psychological suffering he was experiencing. How to reconcile it?

Of course it could not be reconciled but neither could the vow of obedience (he was a monastic remember) be easily discounted.

How was it resolved? By understanding that obedience, in order to be meaningful, must be freely given. Lose the freedom, and all that remains is coercion. But God is not coercive. Does he make anyone believe? Does he make anyone obey? No. The abbot, the monk came to see, did not have the authority he claimed he held.

The monk understood that could leave and still be blessed with the favor of God. Once he grasped this, the psychological chains were broken, an in short order the abbot recognized the monk was no longer his. Fortunately, he was able to leave peaceably.

Athanasius
July 16, 2009 12:25 PM

While we do need authority, it must be taken (always) with a grain of salt. Today's heretic may be tomorrow's prophet. History has born this out time and time again, and being truly Christ-like, I doubt, means we have to be dumb cattle or mindless exegetes.

As conservative as I've been, even I recognize that being truly Christ-like may mean challenging the authorities and even the authorities of "his church".

scotch meg
July 16, 2009 1:04 PM

I am struck by Mr. Skojek's experience as contrasted with that of a young man I know who recently left his position as a numerary of Opus Dei. When he responded unenthusiastically to the announcement that it was time for him to take permanent vows, his superiors told him to rethink his position -- that if, after six years, he was not increasingly enthusiastic about what he was doing, then he should be doing something else.

I don't mean to suggest that Opus Dei is without flaws (c.f. Marie Banks above), but rather to give an instance of what ought to happen.

Your Name
August 15, 2009 9:22 PM

I teach in a school where there are a lot of Opus Dei members. Some of our students are also connected to the Legionaires. I have heard horror stories about both of these groups. I left the Catholic Church because of the things I have seen in it. I feel a great deal of guilt about leaving, but at the same time I was disowned from my family by becoming Catholic in the first place so the guilt over that has been intense. After looking at the Anglican and Orthodox churches, I started reading carefully about the origins of the Christian church to begin with. What I found, especially from the Jewish side, showed me that the real problem with religion is that it purports to speak the Truth for everyone despite one's own experience or instincts, or intelligence. St. Paul may have been himself a guilt-ridden Jewish convert who was trying to justify his own abandonment of Judaism. So insistence on obedience and authority would be good ways to make sure that investigation, critical thinking, and skeptical caution would not happen. I am disturbed by the turn to obedience in the under-30s who join groups like the Legionares and Opus Dei. They are absolutely certain that they have the truth and do not need to think at all. That combined with right-wing politics yeilds an anti-democratic and authoritarian spirit that provides the ground for a tyrant. We are forgetting the experience of Germany and the 20th century. I am sometimes really scared.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.