Crunchy Con

Mikhalkov's questions for Anna

Monday July 20, 2009

The documentary "Anna" records Russian filmmaker Nikita Mikhalkov's experiment with his daughter Anna. Once a year, from the time she was six until she was 17, Mikhalkov sat down with Anna and asked her these questions:

What do you love the most?

What do you hate the most?

What scares you the most?

What do you want more than anything right now?

What do you expect from life?

What does the homeland mean to you?

The director records his daughter's answers to these questions every year, thus documenting her growing moral awareness and maturity.

Isn't that an interesting topic? Would you do that with your child, or children? Are there any questions you would add to this list? I might add, "Who is God and what does he want from you?" Or perhaps you would have six or seven questions you'd ask instead of these. What say you?

Would you readers like to do an "Anna" Project with our kids? I think I would.

For that matter, I'd be interested to read how you readers would answer these questions today. I'm not going to post my answers, because I don't have all afternoon to track the thread to pluck off the trolling. But you who post anonymously should have no problem answering these questions, if you'd like.

Advertisement
Comments
Geoff G.
July 21, 2009 12:09 AM

Paul Pfaff, that's wonderful! For the record, I could definitely use some gelato too!

Cecelia
July 21, 2009 12:36 AM

love the most - my family. It would be phoney if I claimed to love God more than my family - but I feel a great sense of gratitude to God for my family. hate the most: cruelty, being afraid fear the most: loss of those I love, poverty, want the most right now: oh - good physical/spiritual health for myself and my family, gelato would be nice too - especially if I could be in Rome eating it! what I expect: don't expect - bound to be disapointed. I try to embrace the adventure that is life. what does homeland mean to you: To me - it is where those I love are, I would second Brint's comments on patriotism.

Thomas R
July 21, 2009 8:24 AM

"The term 'hate' makes no sense to a small child." Shelley

TR: That's sweet, but not very realistic. Little kids do hate things. Their hatreds tend to be pretty temporary and fleeting, but they do exist. I think if you asked a small child what they "hate" they might name a certain food, certain noises, or maybe something their required to do. (Like clean their room or take a bath or something)

I don't know if "homeland" would've meant much to me at five. I might guess "Arkansas" and I suppose that might be what I'd guess now. Although I think to me "homeland" is more the place you belong.

billh
July 21, 2009 9:54 AM

Great exercise
What do you love the most? Relationship with God

What do you hate the most? Complacency/Apathy

What scares you the most? My children's future

What do you want more than anything right now? to know God more fully

What do you expect from life? fulfillment and purpose

What does the homeland mean to you? I love America, I am thankful for the freedoms/opportunities that people will stuff themselves inside of cargo containers to experience.

Brint
July 21, 2009 10:05 AM

The problem I have with patriotism is really a problem with blind patriotism. I'm thankful for the sacrifices of all who have kept us safe over the years. The United States has traditions of freedom and self-determination that are truly precious. The principles in the Constitution and Bill of Rights were revolutionary at the time, and are still exceptional. Folks risked all, fought and died for this country, even when it was only a few principals written down on some paper. I don't take any of this lightly.

All that said, I have no problem pointing out that the principles underpinning this country have been under attack from it's inception. Free speech, due process, checks and balances and many other freedoms we enjoy are deeply inconvenient to those in power. Recently we've seen a concerted effort to hollow out constitutional protections and to defer to corporate interests in a way that makes the reality of the modern US function more like an oligarchy than a democracy. Politicians are blatantly paid for their votes and legislation is often written by the lobbyists themselves. We don't need another Sedition Act these days because the corporate media is working in concert with the moneyed interests that own both political parties. There is a very long list of things that are threatening our freedoms and the legacy of those who sacrificed to bring them to us.

So when I think about the "homeland" (and I find that phase creepy), I see the reality behind these wonderful ideals we hold. Corrupt politicians, graft, moral decay, a willfully ignorant population, a deliberate dumbing down of policy because of the reductive nature of the pundocracy and the 24-hour news cycle. The very folks who are benefiting from the bailout are those who architected it. No one wants the truth. We're bankrupt. We're overextended. Our children and grandchildren will have a lower standard of living because of our rampant excess. Anything complex or nuanced is forced to be hidden in details, or off-book because the media meat-grinder is designed to destroy all but the most simplistic solutions in order to fit it into the frames of reference that are available.

I think many liberals and conservatives alike can buy into the above critique.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.