Crunchy Con

US soldiers importing Afghan drugs?

Friday July 3, 2009

Categories: Varia
Last night, I was speaking with a Coloradan who told me the law enforcement community in Colorado Springs is struggling with highly potent Afghan drugs coming into the area from US soldiers flying back from service there, and bringing the...
Advertisement
Comments
TheFirebird
July 4, 2009 1:09 AM

Russian society is still reeling from their soldiers' discovery of Afghan heroin....we'd be fools to think our soldiers are immune.

Chris Mills
July 4, 2009 1:31 AM

Wouldn't shock me. You can't stop people from being people. That being said, if people are doing it, they should go to jail for a long long time.

Chris Mills

Kevin Divine
July 4, 2009 1:57 AM

I just remember what Vizzini said in The Princess Bride: One of the biggest blunders is to get in a land war in Asia.

kenneth
July 4, 2009 2:27 AM

I would be very surprised if this was not going on at some level. It certainly happened in Vietnam, and it went on as far back as Napoleon, at least. The profit potential is enormous. Hashish or opium bought for $20 or $50 there probably sells for several hundred here, at least.

Keep in mind that much of this is not "drug trafficking" in the usual sense of someone running a regular pipleline into the county. In many cases it is probably just a GI cashing in on what they were able to stash in personal belongings. It's not a trade without its risk. I understand they have to go through something like a military equivalent of customs, and the penalties can be quite severe. I would be much more concerned about the potential for weapons trafficking. Afghanistan is littered with automatic weapons which could also be had for a few dollars and resold at a huge premium to street gangs or hate groups.

In the case of opium or heroin, it cannot be said that soldiers are contributing to any real net increase in drug traffick. Virtually all of the world's heroin poppies come from the region and a very large share of that is destined for the US market, and would be whether or not we had troops stationed there.

Lou Jellyfinger
July 4, 2009 9:40 AM

Who said history repeats itself? Anyone remember Nam?

AnotherBeliever
July 4, 2009 10:40 AM

I wouldn't be surprised. But it's not a difficult fix: all of our gear and equipment is inspected by Customs in country and usually again on the way out of Kuwait (they are very thorough with personal gear, so I imagine people are putting stuff in trucks and other equipment.) Mail is also inspected several times before it hits the U.S. system. It would only take some drug dogs to dissuade folks from trying it. Some will get through, of course, but I don't think this will be a big deal.

budcath
July 4, 2009 12:19 PM

In Vietnam it was an actual strategy underwritten by the North, to get as many GIs addicted and or using drugs. The cost was dirt cheap for Heroin, Opium, Hash, and Marijuana. And most of it was brought on base by the hooch maids, who cleaned the barracks (hooches) and did laundry. You order. They deliver.

Athanasius
July 4, 2009 1:59 PM

With the nation that they enlisted to protect with their very lives having exported the jobs they might have come back to fill or filled with alien labor, their might indeed be a rationalizable economic reason for their bringing back these drugs.

I don't condone it, but what they're doing is not incompletely incomprehensible to me.

(Not to thread high-jack but isn't it ironic that the leaders of the republic that sent them to war are now using them to subvert those values with the creation of the new America empire?)

Your Name
July 4, 2009 11:13 PM

Don't have any specific knowledge, but it sounds right. European blogs and press have been reporting about this for several years. Reason that EU and NATO asked for a greater presence in Afghanistan. Not, with the exception of the British, to go south in the nation and fight, but to attempt to intervene the opium trade which is having a devastating effect on Western Europe. If they are concerned, it most likely is coming in to the Colorado Springs area through Fort Carson (Army) and Peterson AFB.

steve
July 5, 2009 12:21 AM

Have not seen this mentioned on the milblogs I follow or in any of the Army War College writings. Not sure they would want to make it public TBH. It is possible, maybe even probable that it is becoming a problem. This is the longest deployment in our history of troops into constantly active combat. WWII was shorter and was more of a war of battles rather than everyday attacks. Maybe some are breaking down a bit.

Steve

Yeah Right
July 5, 2009 2:09 AM

Rodney,

Know your history. Such foolishness happened during Vietnam. And whomever controls the opium controls Asia. That's long been the story, especially in the third-world setups (sans Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, parts of China, etc.) that remain in Asia.

Opium means money. Money means guns. Guns mean power.

That's Asia.

Zak
July 6, 2009 9:55 AM

I was under the impression that most heroin was refined outside of Afghanistan (in Central Asia, or Pakistan, or Iran), so that it would be difficult for US soldiers to have too much access to heroin.

The realist
November 12, 2009 11:32 PM

Let's be honest. Vietnam saw the illegal importation by us airforce cargo planes of large shipments in heroin/opium. The Iran contra war efforts we had in Panama saw huge military importation of crack cocaine. The war of afghan now brings with it vast ammounts of opium back into the states for illegal heroin and to produce the morphine the US annually gobbles up. Opium production has increased over 2000% since we invaded. The Taliban were actually coordinating with the UN to try and rid afghan of it's opium farms. The US has not gotten involved in a non political war and without corporations benefiting from the war since ww2

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.