David Frum recalls the moment he stopped despising Ted Kennedy. Why had he started?
I know exactly the hour when my opinion of Sen. Ted Kennedy permanently changed. I had remained very angry at the Massachusetts liberal for many years since his 1986 speech so unjustly vilifying the great conservative justice Robert Bork:Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, children could not be taught about evolution.For 15 years thereafter I could hardly bear to hear his name spoken. Nor was my temper much improved by his rough handling of another great conservative legalist, Theodore Olson, at Olson's confirmation hearings as solicitor general. I was always ready to laugh at the harsh jokes conservatives told about the senator's legendarily self-indulgent personal laugh. It seemed a fair judgment on an unfair man.
Then came 9/11.
You've got to read about the amazing grace Kennedy later showed that revolutionized Frum's opinion of the man.
You never really know about people, do you? I'm thinking right now about a conversation I had last year with my friend B. about a well-known political controversialist, whose public pronouncements and activism often drive me crazy. "What's wrong with that guy?" I said to B. Ah, said B., let me tell you something about him that you don't know. B. went on to relate a story in which the unsympathetic public figure behaved in private with such staggering generosity to a stranger in need that I had trouble reconciling what I knew about the man in public with this private behavior. But it was true. They were the same man. I'm glad it's up to God to judge the eternal fate of human souls, because only He can know the whole story.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Some say Ted Kennedy was a drunken baffoon spreading his drunken dereliction around on the Senate floor 24/7.
Well Yeah,
"and finally his treatment of Judges Bork"
The fact that Bork has become the Emmett Till of judicial confirmations says a lot about modern conservatism.
Mike
"Robert Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, children could not be taught about evolution." If that's what the majority in a state decided, wouldn't he support their right to do most or all of that? Or would it even have to be a majority? Would he overthrow Baker v. Carr (1962 decision requiring state legislative districts to be of approx. equal population) if he could?
mike, if a majority in a state decided to restrict freedom of speech, would that be okay?
Our democratic republic was created explicitly on a balance between individual rights and majority rule. If I had a dollar (adjusted for inflation) for every time someone shouted "rights and liberty!" or "we voted for that/him/her!" in isolation... I'd be rich enough to run for the US Senate. ;-D
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.