Here's some diverse, intelligent commentary on the Benedict-Anglican story to wash the idiotic MoDo rant out of your head.
Episcopal Cafe floats the idea that this move is designed to strengthen the hand of Anglican traditionalists over the female bishops issue, hoping to keep the Anglican episcopate all-male in anticipation that Canterbury will eventually collapse, and those bishops who are left will reunite with Rome.
Ross Douthat today speculates that the pope is really seeking to form a solid alliance with serious Anglicans to confront rising Islam. Writes Ross, "There are an awful lot of Anglicans, in England and Africa alike, who would prefer a leader who takes Benedict's approach to the Islamic challenge. Now they can have one, if they want him."
Writing from the Catholic left, David Gibson observes that Benedict has not been the status quo transitional pontiff many expected, but rather something of a conservative revolutionary. Excerpt:
Thus far, Benedict's papacy has been one of constant movement and change, the sort of dynamic that liberal Catholics -- or Protestants -- are usually criticized for pursuing. In Benedict's case, this liberalism serves a conservative agenda. But his activism should not be surprising: As a sharp critic of the reforms of Vatican II, Ratzinger has long pushed for what he calls a "reform of the reform" to correct what he considers the excesses or abuses of the time.
Finally, Inside the Vatican's Robert Moynihan, in his e-mail letter today (no link available), -- link here (thanks to reader Pauli) offers the fascinating opinion that Pope Benedict may be undertaking a sort of Benedict Option, to prepare the church universal for a dark night. Excerpt:
If one looks at these meetings in the context of recent events, the essential point is this: Benedict XVI, though now 82, is moving on many different fronts with great energy in a completely unexpected way, given his reputation as a man of thought, not of action. (We are going to have to revise our understanding of his pontificate.) He is clearly reaching out to reunite with many Christian groups: the Lefebvrists, as these meetings show, but also Anglicans, the Orthodox, and others as well. He seems to be trying to make Catholic Rome a center of communion for all Christians. This activity, occurring at an accelerating speed over recent months, looks almost like a "rallying of the troops" before some final, decisive battle.More:
In short, many eyes are now on Benedict, wondering what he really intends here.The answer seems simple enough: Benedict is trying energetically to "get his house in order."
But which house?On one level, it is the Christian Church -- a Christian Church under considerable pressure in the highly secualrized modern world.
In this "house," this "ecclesia Dei" ("church of God" or "community of God"), dogmas and doctrines, formulated into very precise verbal statements, are held as true. These verbal formulas are professed in creeds. Benedict is seeking to overcome divisions over the content of these creeds, these doctrinal formulas, in order to bring about formal, public unity among separated Christians.
He is trying to find unity not only with the Lefebvrists (and all Traditionalists within the Church) but also, as we have seen in recent days, with the Anglicans and the Orthodox Churches.
So this dialogue with the Lefebvrists must be seen in the context of multiple dialogues, all occurring at once: Catholic Traditionalists, Protestant Anglicans, the Orthodox Churches.
One might almost say this pontificate is become one of "all dialogue, all the time."But on a second level, considering world events and the evolution of the world's economy and culture, something else is also at stake.
Benedict is rallying his troops. He is trying to reunite all those factions and denominations and groups in the West that share common beliefs in the eternal destiny of human beings, in the sacredness of human life (since human beings are "in the image and likeness of God"), in the existence of a moral standard which is true at all times and in all places (against the relativism of the modern secular culture), in the need for justice in human affairs, for the rule of right, not might.
And so he is doing his best, in what seems perhaps to be the "twilight of the West," to build an ark, centered in Rome, to which all those who share these beliefs about human dignity may repair.
And this means that what Benedict is doing in this dialogue which got underway today is also of importance to Jews, to Muslims, and to all men and women of goodwill. Mankind seems to be entering a new period, a period in which companies and governments may produce, even for profit, "designer humans," a period of resource wars, a period of the complete rejection of the traditional family unit.Benedict, from his high room in the Apostolic Palace, seems to be trying to rally the West in the twilight of an age, so that what was best in the West may be preserved, and shine forth again after the struggles of our time are past.
Benedict's Benedict Option, in other words. What an amazing man, exactly the man I would hope to see on the Throne of Peter at this time in our history.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Hector,
It was a joke....
I agree, it was a joke, but it fell flat... kind of genuflected humor. What I want to know is, if you think that's funny, who are you and what have you done with Jan Hus? You are hiding behind the name of someone who willingly accepted death at the stake rather than kiss the papal ring. Duh.
I can admire the fact that Jan Hus "willingly accepted death" in withness to his beliefs.
I can also admire the fact that Islamic suicide bombers willingly accept death in witness to their beliefs.
Admiration for any person's sincerity does not translate into acceptance of that person's sincerely held beliefs.
Sometimes the truth is upheld by scoundrels.
Edward, this is fun, but you are muddying the waters. First, Jan Hus didn't take anyone with him, not even the Roman bishops, who deserved it, much less innocent civilians who happened to be hanging around. He simply accepted what the powers that be could do to him, rather than abjure his beliefs. Nobody paid the price but him.
Second, you can consider Jan Hus a scoundrel, but those who speak in his name should at least understand what he stood for. What if I chose the to sign in as "Adolf Hitler" to say that I love what a great job Benedict is doing? No, I don't admire Hitler, and no, what's wrong with Benedict is not the same as what is wrong with Hitler. That's why I raised questions about "who are you and what have you done to Jan Hus?
Finally, I know that scoundrels use the truth, but when has standing up FOR the pure, unadulterated truth been the work of scoundrels???
The news was greeted with hostility in a few circles, with enthusiasm among traditionalists, and with a yawn among most Catholics. And that was the Tridentine Mass is now allowed and unhindered for Catholics all over the world.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.