Crunchy Con

Iran and the 2009 Nobel Peace laureate

Friday October 9, 2009

Categories: Iran
Cunning Realist airs speculation I've heard from a couple other sources today: that giving Obama the Nobel Peace prize could be the Nobel committee's way of trying to short-circuit an Obama attack on Iran. Surely the Nobel peace laureate wouldn't...
Advertisement
Comments
Polichinello
October 9, 2009 4:31 PM

I don't think it's that targeted, but it does give the European Left a pressure point. If they were yell about him not living up to his prize, he'd be personally bothered in a way that someone like Bush or Clinton wouldn't, so they can pretty much use it for just about any cause they care to advocate.

Brian
October 9, 2009 4:37 PM

The only thing more hilarious than the awarding of the nobel prize to Obama is the notion that he would ever consider bombing Iran under any circumstances, regardless of what a bunch of Norwegians do.

Larry
October 9, 2009 4:51 PM

Surely the Nobel peace laureate wouldn't turn around and start a war with the Iranians, yes?

Only if he had no other choice. Sort of like Bush attacking Iraq and Afghanistan. He would have to be forced into. Forced.

MBunge
October 9, 2009 4:51 PM

Considering that Obama is, you know, a grown man and not a sensitive, insecure adolescent, that's a thoroughly stupid suggestion. Some folks need to start dealing with the world as it is and stop constructing elaborate scenarios that more comfortably fit their political fetishes.

Mike

RobL
October 9, 2009 4:53 PM

More likely to give Obama some clout in his various initiatives to find peaceful solutions. And to give him some elbow room from the left.

Houghton
October 9, 2009 4:56 PM

MBunge,

"dealing with the world as it is" -- you mean, like a bizarre-but-true Onionesque tragicomedy in which a man who has been president for nine months is being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize?

Intellectually honest liberals can't help but be embarrassed and sort of appalled at this.

Charles Cosimano
October 9, 2009 5:01 PM

Ok, we all know that the Nobel Peace Prize is almost a big a joke as the Nobel Prize for Literature so why did they dump it on poor Barry? I think it was a sort of Scandavian Consolation Prize for not giving the Olympics to Chicago.

But it could have been worse. They could have given it to Ahmendijhad.

Cecelia
October 9, 2009 5:04 PM

This seems a stretch - Obama's approach to foreign policy has clearly been to avoid unilateral action, develop cooperative relationships with other nations instead of bullying them into doing what we want, and making it clear we are not doing the job (any job) by ourselves. He also has clearly been a consensus builder. If it did become necessary to "bomb Iran" it seems obvious he would only do so as part of a multi national effort.

I suspect too that the whole notion of "bombing" countries is so deeply engrained as an appropriate and sensible response to poorly behaved countries in the neo con psyche that this sort of notion occurs to them. Consider though that to lots of people and certainly lots of nations, bombing anyone, much less Iran, is not seen as anything close to a sensible solution. It is a myth that we have the ability to bomb with pin point accuracy - any attempt at bombing nuclear installations in Iran will result in civilan deaths. Since the world watched civilans in Iran trying to over turn their government, civilan deaths would not be easy to gloss over. It gets hard to bomb people when their faces have become known to us so to speak via all the twittering etc that occurred this summer.

I think it just might be possible that the reason he got the Prize was exactly what the people on the committee who gave him the prize said - that he has embodied an approach to the solutions of the world's problems that the committee has hoped for since its inception 108 years ago (I'm paraphrasing their remarks).

Obama won't bomb anyone unless he is so severely provoked that he can also get the agreement and participation of the rest of the Western democracies. That I suspect would require a provocation so terrible it does not bear thinking about.

John E - Agn Stoic
October 9, 2009 5:31 PM

Bah, if Iran needs to be bombed, the Israelis will do it.

Bradley
October 9, 2009 5:31 PM

Obama appears to be the first adult (in psychosocial terms) US President since Bush the Elder.

Therefore, I expect that his approach to Iran will mirror a similar, realistic approach to any potential military action against Iran; namely get many countries to concur - especially the Saudis and the Turks (and of course the Russians).

The suggestion that the Nobel prize will have an impact on his decision-making is blisteringly absurb - hardly worthy of a 'realist', whether 'cunning' or not.

Polichinello
October 9, 2009 5:35 PM

Cecilia,

I have just as much problem with neocons as anyone, but look at how many counter-factuals are built into your case. What it boils down to is that the award was bestowed merely for having the right intentions instead of obtaining measurable results. What good will that do for the prize's committee if Iran does get a nuke, or commits some horrible massacre because Obama couldn't act quickly enough? Wouldn't it rather discredit the whole notion?

BobN
October 9, 2009 5:49 PM

Nonsense!

The real purpose of the announcement is to focus attention on the President just before tomorrow's "big gay speech" to the HRC (Human Rights Campaign).

What's not clear is whether the attention and brouhaha over the Nobel Prize will completely overwhelm anything he might say tomorrow night OR get a whole lot of reporters to follow him around and, therefore, cover tomorrow's speech as bigger news.

One wonders what they intended.

Inscrutable Norwegians.

BobN
October 9, 2009 5:51 PM

Vis-a-vis bombing, one thing that's certainly off the table as far as the administration is concerned is bombing Oslo...

Brian
October 9, 2009 5:52 PM

Bradley: "Obama appears to be the first adult (in psychosocial terms) US President since Bush the Elder."

Is that a joke? The guy's got absolutely massive father abandonment issues. As did Clinton. Bush II of course wanted to emulate his father in everything.

MBunge
October 9, 2009 6:04 PM

"you mean, like a bizarre-but-true Onionesque tragicomedy in which a man who has been president for nine months is being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize?

Intellectually honest liberals can't help but be embarrassed and sort of appalled at this."


I think, based on when Nobel folks voted, they gave Obama the award after he was President for 9 days or something.

Be that as it may, why should anyone be embarrassed and appalled at anything? I find Obama getting the Nobel to be rather humorous and frankly don't understand any other reaction.

Mike

Deacon John M. Bresnahan
October 9, 2009 6:28 PM

After reading the backgrounds and great accomplishments of others who were nominated--this award must be a sick joke or a sneaky way to manipulate a president who seems easily manipulable in all directions left and anti-American. What gave him the edge to win, I am convinced, is his road tours across Europe slamming and trashing our country.

Bradley
October 9, 2009 6:33 PM

Brian-

If you are going to toss out phrases like *abandonment issues*, then you might want to learn something about that concept. Here's a good start:
http://blog.itsallaboutabandonment.com

FWIW and IMHO, Obama has realized the nature of his problems and ... matured. After all - maturity is reflected in behaviour, and I didn't notice a banner behind him today saying something like "World's Greatest Peacemaker" ... (or 'Mission Accomplished')

Ludes for Breakfast
October 9, 2009 6:36 PM

After Jimmy Carter, Mother Theresa ("The greatest threat to world peace today is abortion"), Henry Kissinger and Woodrow Wilson, the idea that this is even close to being as valuable as the prizes for Chemistry or Medicine is ridiculous. It's always been to the other Nobels what the Special Olympics are to athletics.

Steve
October 9, 2009 6:43 PM

This was mostly their way of thoroughly repudiating Bush.

Steve

Polichinello
October 9, 2009 6:49 PM

Be that as it may, why should anyone be embarrassed and appalled at anything? I find Obama getting the Nobel to be rather humorous and frankly don't understand any other reaction.

When you look at the other people he "beat", the joke turns a bit sour.

Watch This Drive
October 9, 2009 6:56 PM

A reaction to the Nobel award from the State Department:

"Certainly from our standpoint, this gives us a sense of momentum -- when the United States has accolades tossed its way, rather than shoes."

Bradley
October 9, 2009 7:02 PM

It is not obvious that one of the greatest threats to peace is/was neoconservatism.
With the election of Obama, the process began to reduce its influence, in a prudent and patient manner, on US foreign policy.
Just not having Bush the Younger around is worth a sigh of relief.
Let the nitpickers disect all they want, the Big Picture World has passed them by ... at least for a season.

Jeremy
October 9, 2009 7:36 PM

It gets worse...

I just heard on the Bruce Williams talk show that the deadline for Noble Prize nominations is February 2. This means Obama was nominated for the prize after being in office for only a matter of days.

budcath
October 9, 2009 7:37 PM

I can't believe how petty partisan and stupid this has become. It's not his fault, but no matter, any chance to bash him is good. I'm on the Obama email list and got this today.

This morning, Michelle and I awoke to some surprising and humbling news. At 6 a.m., we received word that I'd been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009.

To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize -- men and women who've inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.

But I also know that throughout history the Nobel Peace Prize has not just been used to honor specific achievement; it's also been used as a means to give momentum to a set of causes.

That is why I've said that I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations and all peoples to confront the common challenges of the 21st century. These challenges won't all be met during my presidency, or even my lifetime. But I know these challenges can be met so long as it's recognized that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.

This award -- and the call to action that comes with it -- does not belong simply to me or my administration; it belongs to all people around the world who have fought for justice and for peace. And most of all, it belongs to you, the men and women of America, who have dared to hope and have worked so hard to make our world a little better.

So today we humbly recommit to the important work that we've begun together. I'm grateful that you've stood with me thus far, and I'm honored to continue our vital work in the years to come.

Thank you,

President Barack Obama


Richard Bottoms
October 9, 2009 8:49 PM

Since the award was decided February 9th it's pretty clear it was meant to say thank you Jesus that the American people decided not to inflict another Republican on the rest of the world for another eight years.

Seriously.

George W. Bush has been one of the most monumental disasters to strike this planet any time since the Korean War.

A trillion up in smoke literally in Iraq. Trillions more gone in a cloud of smoke following the rampage of Wall Street on everyone's economy, Denial of Global Warming, support for torture and abduction. Mainly the worst things a modern government could undertake coupled with the belief it was all being done in the name of the Almighty.

Clueless, fevernt coupled with incredible power over the lives of the entire planet. That's the United States under GWB. You bet they thanked God Obama ended the reign of the GOP before we were engaged in a third war with Iran.

Worth 100 Nobel prizes.

Jana
October 9, 2009 8:54 PM

@Bottoms

It's hard to take your rhetoric seriously. You sound like you lost your way looking for DKos.

Richard Bottoms
October 9, 2009 9:45 PM
@Bottoms

It's hard to take your rhetoric seriously. You sound like you lost your way looking for DKos.

Yeah well winning all three houses of congress will do that I suppose.

Nothing like kicking bible-thumping self-righteous incompetent warmongering jerks out on their keisters big a substatial margin and then have the world say: "Way to go."

Next up health reform, Gitmo, and then an end to DADT.

When the second round of stimulus (though it won't be called that) starts to kick in right around this time next year we'll still lose seats in the election but not as many as your puffed up psychos Hannity and Limbaugh think.

If fact this award will cause the Beck and Teabagger crowd to lose it even more than they already have. There's no telling how ugly things will get but I am sure there will be a dozen Macca moments between now and 2010. The GOP will be rooting harder and louder for Obama to fail and it won't all be to adoring crowds.

Independents who have up to now just saying, wuh, will start saying WTF??? to a political party hoping for the domestic automakers to fail. When clowns like Sen. Vitter cheer at events like the Olympic loss people will pay attention. Besides wondering where he finds the time in between visits with prostitutes they'll wonder what means more to a Republican Obama's loss or America's gain.

Being mean spirited and paranoid just doesn't sell well to the 2% swing voter. But since that's what the GOP seems to do best these days they have big problems ahead.

The best news is Team Obama finally realized that teh crazy being pumped out by Republicans is neither accidental, nor can it be ignored. They know it's ime for the Peace President to start taking a rhetorical baseball bat to his Republican critics.

Judges from the rest of the world are holding up a 10.0 for that.

Houghton
October 9, 2009 9:53 PM

Jana,

Do not taunt Bottoms, do not engage with Bottoms, do not heed Bottoms.

In other words, do not feed the bear.

Actually, "Richard Bottoms" is a pseudonym that pops up on quite a few blogs I've seen.

Either it's the same troll, or a nom de guerre taken up by a number of moonbats in the name of small-minded ideology.

Houghton
October 9, 2009 10:10 PM

I don't think it's much of a conspiratorial stretch -- given that Obama must have known he'd been nominated for the prize back in February -- to think that his knowledge of the nomination and his potential to win the prize tainted his foreign policy decision-making over the past nine months.

Yes, there seems to be a taint to all of this.

The taint of the Nobel Prize.

John E. - Agn. Stoic
October 10, 2009 12:25 AM

"Yeah well winning all three houses of congress will do that I suppose."

RB, I love your rants, but ... all three houses of congress?

Dude...

"I don't think it's much of a conspiratorial stretch --"

Pshaw - you call that a conspiratorial stretch? No alien DNA? No contrails? No mention of the Georgia Guidestones?

You wouldn't get past George Noory's call screener if that's all you've got.

Anyway, what would you have liked to have seen differently in foreign policy over the past nine months?

Richard Bottoms
October 10, 2009 12:49 AM
RB, I love your rants, but ... all three houses of congress?

Thanks. All three branches of government.

If the economy swings back the other way in any significant manner we may just keep it that way in 2010.

Thomas R
October 10, 2009 4:37 AM

"Since the award was decided February 9th it's pretty clear it was meant to say thank you Jesus that the American people decided not to inflict another Republican on the rest of the world for another eight years.

Seriously."

TR: That's very possible. Much of Scandinavia seems intensely knee-jerk in their disdains, taboos, and hostilities. US Republicans frighten them, the poor sensitive little deers.

Not that I really like the Republicans anymore, but the way they act about is almost as petty and puerile as your reaction.


Thomas R
October 10, 2009 4:38 AM

I meant to add though that I do agree with your hopes of Vitter losing. The guy's a whoremonger and I believe his expected opponent is a Pro-Life Democrat.

Houghton
October 10, 2009 11:36 AM

Oh, never mind. When it goes their way, it's always "the American people" and how honorable the people of America are to people like dear Mr. Bottoms -- but if 2010 flips the GOP's way, it'll be the "American sheeple and their fascist masters" as his appellation.

Richard Bottoms
October 10, 2009 12:44 PM
Oh, never mind. When it goes their way, it's always "the American people" and how honorable the people of America are to people like dear Mr. Bottoms -- but if 2010 flips the GOP's way, it'll be the "American sheeple and their fascist masters" as his appellation.

We've just been through eight years of the worst leadership the country has ever had to suffer through. A presidency so poisonious to global relations that the world gives the incoming president a Nobel prize just for getting elected.

The Republican party is nothing more than a mean spirited, fiscally & managerially incompetent, short sighted group of bed wetting whiners resembling a cult more than a political movement.

You voted twice for an incompetent boob who nearly ran one war into utter failure to the tune of $1,000,000,000,000 tax payer dollars and the meter is still running. The second war, one of necessity and launched with near unanimous support has been going on longer than World War II and s such has nearly lost the support of the people despite the importance of the mission.

Forty million Americans are uninsured and those who are face loss of what little care they can get when they can get past the insurnace company's blatant moves to drop coverage at the slightest whim. Banks gouge them for enormous fees and tilt a system for debit cards to ensure maximum opportunities for additional fees.

Americans have been poised by their meat, lettuce, toys, and water as lax industry oversight has been loosened even further in blind adherence to an ideology of deregulation.

Agencies headed by moralistic ideologues spend millions going after television networks for displaying a breast while ignoring consolidation of industries left and right that drive up prices and reduce services with their main focus on such public necessities as identifying who is getting an abortion.

A new president sets about to change this insanity only to be met with a paranoid fantasy of death panels, internment camps, Gurkha assassins, and real crazies showing up to his speeches with pistols and rifles to the cheers of supposedly sane GOP politicians.

You had your chance to make "conservatism" work and nearly wrecked the country if not the world. The 49% of Americans are slaves to this cult of the GOP is not a surprise.

What will happen hopefully will be that the %2 swing voters will continue to see how stupid, vile and incompetent anyone one running under the GOP banner will be when given the power to govern.

The best thing that can happen in 2012 is that the GOP nominates the moose hunting airhead from Alaska with the Urkle-like exorcist from Louisiana for vice-president. When Obama wins again he may find himself getting 10 Nobel prizes from a world sick with relief.

Rod Dreher
October 10, 2009 12:48 PM

OK, when Richard Bottoms gets back to his DailyKos jeremiads, a thread has officially jumped the shark. Thanks for playing, everybody. Drive safely.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.