Crunchy Con

Wall Street stiffs compliant Obama

Tuesday October 20, 2009

Categories: Democrats, Economics

NYT reports that Wall Street bigs have decided to be stingy to the Democratic Party, staying away from a big fundraiser scheduled for tonight in Manhattan. This, after all Team Obama has done for them? Tsk, tsk. From the Times:

Part of the reason, several Democratic fund-raisers and executives said, is a fear of getting caught in the public rage over the perception that Wall Street titans profiting from their government bailout may use their winnings to give back to Washington in return. And the timing of the event, as the industry lobbies against proposals for tighter regulations to address the underlying causes of last year's meltdown on Wall Street, has only added to the worry over public appearances.

"There are sensitivities there," said Scott Talbot, a lobbyist for the industry's Financial Services Roundtable. Political contributions "can make a donor a target," Mr. Talbot said. Many involved, though, say the low attendance from those Wall Street giants also reflected a broader disenchantment with Mr. Obama over the angry language emanating from the White House over the million-dollar bonuses and anti-regulatory lobbying.

"There is some failure in the finance industry to appreciate the level of public antagonism toward whatever Wall Street symbolizes," said Orin Kramer, a partner in an investment firm who is a Democratic fund-raiser and one of the event's chairmen. "But in order to save the capitalist system, the administration has to be responsive to the public mood, and that is a nuance which can get lost on Wall Street."

Dr. Daniel E. Fass, another chairman of the event who lives surrounded by financiers in Greenwich, Conn., said: "The investment community feels very put-upon. They feel there is no reason why they shouldn't earn $1 million to $200 million a year, and they don't want to be held responsible for the global financial meltdown." Dr. Fass added, "How much that will be reflected in their support for the president remains to be seen."

It would be nice if Obama weren't flying to Manhattan to receive whorish tribute from the same people he ought to be fighting and disciplining on behalf of the common good and the future of our capitalist system. It would also be nice if I won the lottery, lost 20 pounds and could speak fluent French without really trying. They're making a fool of Obama, and he's willing to be made a fool of. Will he ever wake up and realize that these people are not on his side, and indeed not on anybody's side but their own?

Advertisement
Comments
Grumpy Old Man
October 20, 2009 10:33 AM

Your blog constatntly hangs up my computer with what my browser describes as unresponsive scripts.

Di
October 20, 2009 10:56 AM
http://www.moronacity.com/catholic-journal/

Grumpy Old Man - you should try a different browser. It's my guess that you're using Internet Explorer, which is notorious for that.

ON TOPIC: Our system is not true capitalism. It hasn't been for quite some while. If it were, many more people would be without homes and food. Those of us who are unemployed wouldn't be getting checks. Our system is greatly flawed thanks to those in charge. :-\

Dan Berger
October 20, 2009 11:44 AM

Not only was TR better-versed in what was seen as important in flyover country, due to his ability to mix with -- and win fights with -- his cowboy buddies in NoDak, not to mention an apparent lack of race prejudice, but he had enough family money to be able to thumb his nose at selected big business.

Which is a long-winded way of saying we need a good old-fashioned round of trust-busting.

Lord Karth
October 20, 2009 12:32 PM

Dan Berger, @ 11:44 AM, writes:

"Not only was TR better-versed in what was seen as important in flyover country, due to his ability to mix with -- and win fights with -- his cowboy buddies in NoDak, not to mention an apparent lack of race prejudice, but he had enough family money to be able to thumb his nose at selected big business.

Which is a long-winded way of saying we need a good old-fashioned round of trust-busting."

Fair enough. We can start with the biggest "trust" of the bunch: the United States government, provincial subsidiaries and all.

Your servant,

Lord Karth

Heritage Hills
October 20, 2009 10:13 PM

"...In order to save capitalism, the administration has to..."

The Obama administration WANTS to save capitalism....?

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.