The iconoclastic environmentalists Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger light into the popular green blogger Joe Romm as a Green McCarthy. Excerpts:
It's no coincidence that America's Climate McCarthyite-in-chief is a blogger at the largest liberal think tank and not a U.S. Senator. Busy fundraising and campaigning, members of Congress have largely outsourced the deliberative process of legislating to partisan interest groups and think tanks.Much has been written about the ideological echo chamber conservatives like Sen. James Inhofe, Rush Limbaugh, and Glen Beck have created to enforce anti-environmental orthodoxy on the Right. Less remarked upon has been the creation of its analog on the Left - an accomplishment in which Romm has taken a leading role. Romm has mastered the echo chamber in its liberal expression and creates a reassuring green womb for his growing cadre of loyal readers.
Most importantly Romm functions to inform his readers of the partisan identity of any given thing, whether it be a new technology, policy, or analysis. Thus, when it came time for Romm to criticize a rather technical piece on the rising carbon intensity of the global economy that appeared in the journal Nature he attacked it not as inaccurate or incorrect, but rather as Republican.
More:
Joe Romm has the trust of liberals and Democrats, but not on the force of his arguments, the weight of his evidence, or the success of his agenda, for all are spectacular failures. As terrible as it may turn out to be, global warming is not "apocalypse now." No, Joe Romm has won the trust of partisans because he tells them the story they want to hear better than anyone else. Unfortunately, hyper-partisans like Joe Romm are part of the problem, not the solution. Effective solutions to global warming cannot be enacted in our extremely divided political environment.Democratic partisans, liberals and greens have spent much of the last eight years tearing out our hair about all the ways the hyper-partisan it's-all-a-hoax! Republicans have blocked action on climate. These complaints may have been cathartic, but they have not been productive. We have not had and cannot have any impact on Republicans, and our partisan apocalypse talk and our sacrifice-now agenda are obviously alienating the vast, moderate middle.
Their post is well worth reading in its entirety. A dismal reality cited by the authors is that in today's fractured media and political environment, the only way to get heard, it seems, is to stake out extreme positions. This is true on both the left and the right.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Rod, please cite one example of a Democratic Senator refering to his critics as Fascists, or of a Democratic president or VP claiming that his critics are strengthening America's enemies.
You are attempting to be even-handed about a topic in which the truth is thoroughly one-sided.
"[A]ny and all critical responses they receive from professional scientists will be portrayed as Religious Dogma Stifling Free Speech (tm). Contrarians don't have to prove their arguments; their arguments ARE their proof."
C'mon, we don't need to drag Galileo into everything, do we?
"Joe Romm is, in fact, far more influential today than Joe McCarthy was in the 1950s."
Oh, please. You can't seriously believe that.
Rod, you're a blogger, you know should know better (and probably do).
This may be the most ridiculous, preposterous, absurd statement made this century, up there with "I was hiking the Appalachian Trail," and "We will be welcomed as liberators."
@ Joel: Really? I mean, seriously? You need handholding on that one?
This sounds like a tempest in a teapot to me. From the first few remarks, it doesn't sound like this Romm guy is such a big deal, nor does he deserve to be, although he may be a fast burning fad, the Sarah Palin of the left. But when you say that:
in today's fractured media and political environment, the only way to get heard, it seems, is to stake out extreme positions. This is true on both the left and the right.
it must be true, because I've been offending both extremes for years, and I'm grateful to have one anonymous poster on someone else's blog say something nice about me. Anyway, I never heard of Romm until Rod Dreher wrote about him.
Oh, Karlub, Joel was asking for DATA. Facts. Information. Examples. Hard News. Do you have any to offer?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.