Bedlam or Parnassus turns to the Aeneid for a model of a military's blindness to a Trojan horse within.
Over to you, Gen. Casey.
Advertisement
Bedlam or Parnassus turns to the Aeneid for a model of a military's blindness to a Trojan horse within.
Over to you, Gen. Casey.
Steve, I share your confidence in the Army's ability to investigate and make course corrections as needed. The Army understands both the concept of responsibility and the concept of continuous learning.
If it is true the CIA knew this guy attempted to contact jhihadists, was that info passed on to the FBI, was it passed on to the military? This does not seem like "too much diversity and pc" but a failure in our counter terrorists efforts. Why would the system fail ? Too much PC is an easy answer - but maybe we might want to consider that the system is not integrated, that agencies are still not sharing intelligence with each other? Or maybe there simply is too much information and the system cannot effectively handle the intelligence it gets. Or maybe the system is overwhelmed by two wars.
I suspect, based on no evidence at all, that the CIA had told the Army to use a hands-off approach on Hasan in hopes that he would make contact with jihadists and that they might turn him, or at least glean more information about the jihadist network by watching him.
If it comes down to deciding what is important for the Army, I will go with Casey's opinion over yours Rod. You are just venting feelings and ideology. You have no responsibility for the consequences of your rants. He has to be responsible for lives.
Uh, really? So he's going to resign then? Because the diversity doctrine that he's pushing got 12 troops and 1 civilian killed at Ft. Hood.
This whole diversity racket is color awareness, instead of color blindness. It's racism, pure and simple.
When I was in the Army, 20 years ago (in Berlin at the Wall this very night, in fact), we didn't put up with all this diversity nonsense. Then there was only one color in the service: green.
John E said: I suspect, based on no evidence at all, that the CIA had told the Army to use a hands-off approach on Hasan in hopes that he would make contact with jihadists and that they might turn him, or at least glean more information about the jihadist network by watching him.
Yes my thought too - but again - it goes to the issue that a focus on PC and diversity is among a long list of possible explanations and all those explanations should be considered before we get into expelling Muslims from the military.
A news report this morning states that “U.S. intelligence official said Monday that ‘there's no sign at this point that the CIA collected information relevant to this case and then simply sat on it.’"
Hasan reportedly did send some emails last year and this year. “A terrorism expert with access to information about the case cautioned against drawing any conclusions from Hasan's communications with Aulaqi. The expert said it appears that Hasan may have contacted the cleric for academic research he was conducting. The correspondence, he said, is "’not a smoking gun, but communications that in hindsight raise some concern.’
‘It obviously suggests that Dr. Hasan was reaching out either for personal or academic reasons, given the nature of his thesis and the work he was preparing to do as a researcher,’ added the expert, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the investigation.”
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.