Crunchy Con

Nidal Hasan isn't the only Muslim U.S. soldier

Friday November 6, 2009

Categories: Islam, War

David Frum reminds us to keep this image below and these others in mind as we struggle to figure out the meaning of Maj. Nidal Hasan's disgusting mass murder. Frum's right:

kareem.jpg

Advertisement
Comments
Jon
November 7, 2009 9:37 AM

Re: Of the three Abrahamic religions, Christians are ahead -- easily -- in the killing stakes.

If we are counting all the deaths perpetrated even for wholly secular causes by people who were at least nominally Christian, then this is probably true. If we are counting only deaths wrought only in the name of religion then I think Islam holds pride of place. Not because Islam is more vicious, but simply because Islam had a larger empire founded explicitly on religion for far longer.

d'aquino
November 7, 2009 2:14 PM

Who are you and what have you done with the Rod Dreher who wrote all the other Fort Hood posts on this blog?

Some lovely commenters, btw.

Siarlys Jenkins
November 8, 2009 12:00 AM

One point of which Osama bin Laden & Co. seem to be profoundly ignorant, as are those who quote haddiths to prove that Islam is incapable of being a peaceful religion, is that the original point of the Muslim conquests had nothing to do with spreading the faith. Fighting unbelievers was, first and foremost, a matter of exterminating paganism among Arab tribes on the Arabian peninsula. Conquest of territory in the decrepit and exhausted Greek/Roman and Sassanian Persian empires was just that: empires always fight each other, Arabs had always fought Arabs, and now, being united by Islam, had to find someone else to fight.

The Rashidun Caliphs, the Ummayad Caliphs, and the Abbasid Caliphs left Christians and Jews undisturbed, suppressed idol worship, generally were tougher on the Zoroastrian faith, and financed their empire with a tax on non-Muslims. They would have gone broke without it. They were reluctant to allow their subjects to convert. The first real effort at conversion was in dealing with the Berbers, because the Berbers were kicking ass with the Muslim armies moving across North Africa. They had to be won over.

In later centuries, various Muslim sects arose that were more fanatical about converts and/or killing nonbelievers. They naturally justified their own twist by quoting haddiths. You can find the same pattern in Christianity. The Gospels of Jesus Christ contains even less mandate to conquer, kill, or convert at the point of a sword, but by the 4th century, Christians were doing exactly that, acclerated among the newly-converted German tribes who were warlike anyway, and couldn't believe this Jesus they agree to follow wouldn't want them to kill His Enemies. So, any fanatical terrorist who wants to wrap themselves in the Qu'ran can do so, as have many fanatical terrorists wrapped themsleves in the Gospel. The point is to untangle the religious faith adhered to by hundreds of millions from the propaganda of thugs, so they can't use it as cover.

No, that does not require being nice to thugs because they speak in the name of some widespread faith. Eric Rudolph is serving life in prison. So should anyone who kills in the name of Islam.

Chris W.
November 9, 2009 1:34 PM

They're all terrorists. Any muslim makes a pact to inflict their religion and morals on any "infidel" (someone who has chosen to not believe in that rubbish) by any means necessary, even if that includes mass murder of children, innocents, and especially American soldiers.

Islam as a peaceful religion my ass.

Death to Islamic Fundamentalism and Extremism. Enough of this peaceful and tolerant bullshit. They hate us. They want to kill as many of us as possible. The facts are the facts and there is no denying it. It is painfully obvious by now. Get them out of our military NOW!

T. W. Clinton
November 9, 2009 2:17 PM

Death to ANY Fundamentalism and Extremism! Include the Jewish and extreme conservatives in the old USA. I am a Roman-Catholic and shame meself when I hear people only talking from the bible and make a political vote based on that!!! Religion belongs in churches and temples NOT IN POLITICS!!!

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.