Crunchy Con

Prosperity gospel and the economic crash

Thursday November 19, 2009

I encourage you to read Hanna Rosin's cover story in the current issue of The Atlantic, citing the role the spread of the prosperity gospel -- the idea that God wants you to be rich, and to have nice things -- to the economic crash. The title is "Did Christianity Cause the Crash?", which is an unfortunate headline, because what she really means to ask is: Did this faddish but counterfeit form of Christianity play a role in provoking the economic crisis?

It's impossible to quantify the degree to which it may have done, of course, but Rosin makes a good case that the utter insanity of the prosperity gospel -- coupled with the flat-out greed of bankers willing to make loans to gullible and greedy Jesus followers -- did harm. She writes, "Demographically, the growth of the prosperity gospel tracks fairly closely to the pattern of foreclosure hot spots. Both spread in two particular kinds of communities--the exurban middle class and the urban poor." As a Christian, reading about these crackpot preachers and their followers really burns me up. Here's the philosophical and historical gist of her piece:

Many explanations have been offered for the housing bubble and subsequent crash: interest rates were too low; regulation failed; rising real-estate prices induced a sort of temporary insanity in America's middle class. But there is one explanation that speaks to a lasting and fundamental shift in American culture--a shift in the American conception of divine Providence and its relationship to wealth.

In his book Something for Nothing, Jackson Lears describes two starkly different manifestations of the American dream, each intertwined with religious faith. The traditional Protestant hero is a self-made man. He is disciplined and hardworking, and believes that his "success comes through careful cultivation of (implicitly Protestant) virtues in cooperation with a Providential plan." The hero of the second American narrative is a kind of gambling man--a "speculative confidence man," Lears calls him, who prefers "risky ventures in real estate," and a more "fluid, mobile democracy." The self-made man imagines a coherent universe where earthly rewards match merits. The confidence man lives in a culture of chance, with "grace as a kind of spiritual luck, a free gift from God." The Gilded Age launched the myth of the self-made man, as the Rockefellers and other powerful men in the pews connected their wealth to their own virtue. In these boom-and-crash years, the more reckless alter ego dominates. In his book, Lears quotes a reverend named Jeffrey Black, who sounds remarkably like Garay: "The whole hope of a human being is that somehow, in spite of the things I've done wrong, there will be an episode when grace and fate shower down on me and an unearned blessing will come to me--that I'll be the one."

To be sure, this is not a drive-by trashing on prosperity preaching. Rosin really does try to understand its appeal. I found myself most affected by the way this stuff is taking off among minorities. Excerpt:

More recently, critics have begun to argue that the prosperity gospel, echoed in churches across the country, might have played a part in the economic collapse. In 2008, in the online magazine Religion Dispatches, Jonathan Walton, a professor of religious studies at the University of California at Riverside, warned:
Narratives of how "God blessed me with my first house despite my credit" were common ... Sermons declaring "It's your season of overflow" supplanted messages of economic sobriety and disinterested sacrifice. Yet as folks were testifying about "what God can do," little attention was paid to a predatory subprime-mortgage industry, relaxed credit standards, or the dangers of using one's home equity as an ATM.

In 2004, Walton was researching a book about black televangelists. "I would hear consistent testimonies about how 'once I was renting and now God let me own my own home,' or 'I was afraid of the loan officer, but God directed him to ignore my bad credit and blessed me with my first home,'" he says. "This trope was so common in these churches that I just became immune to it. Only later did I connect it to this disaster."

See? And here's a bit about how it appeals to Latino immigrants (who disproportionately took out subprime mortgages). Excerpt:

Among Latinos the prosperity gospel has been spreading rapidly. In a recent Pew survey, 73 percent of all religious Latinos in the United States agreed with the statement: "God will grant financial success to all believers who have enough faith." For a generation of poor and striving Latino immigrants, the gospel seems to offer a road map to affluence and modern living. Garay's church is comprised mostly of first-generation immigrants. More than others I've visited, it echoes back a highly distilled, unself-conscious version of the current thinking on what it means to live the American dream.

And:

While it sounds absurd, this kind of message can have a positive influence, according to Tony Tian-Ren Lin, a researcher at the University of Virginia who has made a close study of Latino prosperity gospel congregations over the years. These churches typically take in people who had "been basically dropped into the world from pretty primitive settings"--small towns in Latin America with no electricity or running water and very little educational opportunity. In their new congregation, their pastor slowly walks them through life in the U.S., both inside and outside of church, until they become more confident. "In Mexico, nobody ever told them they could do anything," says Lin, who was himself raised in Argentina. He finds the message at prosperity churches to be quintessentially American. "They are taught they can do absolutely anything, and it's God's will. They become part of the elect, the chosen. They get swept up in the manifest destiny, this idea that God has lifted Americans above everyone else."

It says something that the most vibrant form of religion in America used to be the old Protestant kind that said if you worked hard and disciplined yourself and lived right, you would prosper. It was in some ways a myth, of course, but there were real truths about human nature embedded in it, and the kind of society built out of that ethic was likely to be a healthy one. But now the most vibrant form of religion might well be this corrupt casino Christianity. That says something too about our country, and its future.

These prosperity gospel jackals are the enemy of the Gospel. But I have to admit that I have never been poor, so I don't know what it's like to be tempted by this kind of pseudo-spirituality.

Advertisement
Comments
KateA
November 21, 2009 6:15 PM

I very much enjoyed reading this post and all the thoughtful comments. Definitely many noteworthy points to ponder.

Thanks to everyone who posted. Like Sigarilis, I am going to ponder the points and ideas raised here.

Robin Thomas
November 21, 2009 8:41 PM

My God, how ludicrous! Wall St. keeps trying to blame Main St. for the mess.
This was the fault of the Fed and Wall St. PERIOD.
The regular Joe can't even balance his checkbook, let alone figure out what an option arm is. Working people, people of color, just trying to put a roof over their heads, Christian or not, are NOT to blame for the meltdown. The Fed kept interest rates too low for too long, Wall St. invented toxic loan products, and the bubble blew up. You can't blame the "Christian" populace for this. The lack of intellectual integrity here is staggering.

Robin Thomas
November 21, 2009 9:36 PM

I can't get over the fact that some idiot found the kahoonas to blame a victimized populace for the foreclosure mess and economic meltdown. Stupid.

FSM
November 23, 2009 9:55 AM

Christians. It always all about you.
Is it really so inconceivale that there could be a crisis in the world that had absolutely nothing to do with you?

Brian
December 3, 2009 6:36 PM

"It says something that the most vibrant form of religion in America used to be the old Protestant kind that said if you worked hard and disciplined yourself and lived right, you would prosper. It was in some ways a myth, of course, but there were real truths about human nature embedded in it, and the kind of society built out of that ethic was likely to be a healthy one."

I beg to differ. The "old Protestant" illusion that prosperity is the result of a superior work ethic is equally flawed and just as dangerous as the illusion propogated by prosperity preachers. Where the former allows one to reach the "religious truth" that the poor are poor because they don't work hard enough to earn God's favor, the latter glorifies financial success -- quite literally! While Christ had very little to say about so many of the social issues that now occupy our attention, his instructions to those who would follow him are crystal clear.

It is this very reason that I no longer consider myself a Christian, at least not in any popular form of the term. When it comes to issues like abortion, traditional marriage, or civil rights, Christians, by and large, tow a fairly rational line. But when they talk about the accumulation of wealth in any form, they're talking out of both side of their mouths. Catholics and protestants alike. When there's a broad based undersanding and open admition that the accumulation of wealth is antithetical to practicing the Christian faith, I'll consider returning.

But this would require so many Christians to realize that capitalism and Christianity are diametrically opposed. One must destroy the other to have any hope of practicing its stated philosophy.

I'm not holding my breath.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.