Crunchy Con

Worse than Mark Hamill's Luke Skywalker?

Monday November 2, 2009

My sons are huge Star Wars fans, so I've had to watch more than my share of the first three films (I won't even stay in the room when the last three are screened, they're so awful). From the perspective of decades later (I was 10 when the first Star Wars film came out), I can't decide which is more wooden: Mark Hamill's performance as Luke Skywalker, or George Lucas's screenwriting.

That question would have been obviated had the unbearable alternative future promised by this old screen test come true. Presenting Kurt Russell in the 1970s, reading for the part of Han Solo:

What next? Ken Berry trying out for Obi Wan?

Advertisement
Comments
Nomilk
November 2, 2009 5:04 PM

Actually, I can see KURT (not Ken) Russell as Han Solo. In any case, he was fantastic as Jack Burton in BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA, one of my all-time favorites. In fact, all his early work with John Carpenter (ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK, THE THING, etc.) is noteworthy.

meh
November 2, 2009 5:41 PM

Mark Hamill was awesome as the voice of The Joker in Batman: The Animated Series. Best Joker ever.

Quiddity
November 2, 2009 6:02 PM

I'm with Rod on this. I saw Star Wars as a "relaxing break" from studying for the upcoming finals week at Caltech. What a mistake! I hated it, mostly because of the non-scientific/magical Force angle. But the dialogue was also miserable to sit through. And I saw it at the Grauman's Chinese Theater in Hollywood, so there were no problems with projection or sound.

Oddly enough, the parody version that was made for the Family Guy television show was enjoyable. I think that was because it was faster paced and shorn of tedious solemnity.

shaun
November 3, 2009 6:59 AM
http://kikoshouse.blogspot.com

Rod is onto something here. My friends and I were so blown away after seeing the first "Star Wars" over the summer of 1977 that we turned around and marched right back into the theater for a second screening.

The luster had not worn off with the second and third installments, but looking back on that era now it is obvious as to why these movies were so compelling: The special effects were a mind blowing departure from anything that had come before. Three decades later, those special effects are still terrific if now dated, but the dialogue and acting is astonishingly wooden.

CatherineNY
November 3, 2009 12:42 PM

Wow -- talk about a disturbance in the force! This was excruciating to watch. I have to say I loved the first three movies so much that I walked out of a business conference in Buffalo, NY, to see the first showing the third film, along with a sea of eight-year-olds. But now, in my maturity (dotage?), I can see that the early SW flicks fall into the category of "so bad that they are good." But those are my favorite kinds of movies.

Thank goodness for Harrison Ford!

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.