I saw your post on Beliefnet about the border fence being a good reason to vote for Republicans. I wondered if you'd had a chance to read this article in which even the Republicans admit that the "fence bill" gives the administration the ability to spend the money on different projects (such as roads and technology) and that probably only 300-400 miles will ever be built (if that).
To me, the money quote was, "In this case, it also reflects political calculations by GOP strategists that voters do not mind the details, and that key players — including the administration, local leaders and the Mexican government — oppose a fence-only approach."
I'm planning to sit this election out, and I'm the sort who used to take my kids with me to vote so they'd learn about civic duty.
But wait, Reader! Don't you want to run out and vote Republican to protect traditional marriage? Oh wait, that's right, the GOP cynically punted on that one too. Phonies.
The reader raises an interesting question, though: is it ever the right thing to do to sit out an election? My DMN colleague Mike Hashimoto wrote a funny but serious column yesterday saying that contrary to the eat-your-spinach, good-government propaganda, the nation is not well-served when ill-informed idiots vote out of some sense of civic duty. On a more serious (and ideological) note, the Thomist philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre put forth an argument for sitting out the 2004 presidential race. Here's an excerpt:
Why should we reject both? Not primarily because they give us wrong answers, but because they answer the wrong questions. What then are the right political questions? One of them is: What do we owe our children? And the answer is that we owe them the best chance that we can give them of protection and fostering from the moment of conception onwards. And we can only achieve that if we give them the best chance that we can both of a flourishing family life, in which the work of their parents is fairly and adequately rewarded, and of an education which will enable them to flourish. These two sentences, if fully spelled out, amount to a politics. It is a politics that requires us to be pro-life, not only in doing whatever is most effective in reducing the number of abortions, but also in providing healthcare for expectant mothers, in facilitating adoptions, in providing aid for single-parent families and for grandparents who have taken parental responsibility for their grandchildren. And it is a politics that requires us to make as a minimal economic demand the provision of meaningful work that provides a fair and adequate wage for every working parent, a wage sufficient to keep a family well above the poverty line.
MacIntyre says the best way to vote against a system that produces what he considers false choices is not to vote.
Is he right? Is it morally justified to sit out this election, if you believe you are presented with two bad alternatives? I'm not sure, but I'm tempted to say yes. Let's talk this through.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon