Everyday Ethics

Everyday Ethics

Rat Stuck In NYC Sidewalk Creates Quite A Moral Kerfuffle

posted by hfields | 9:42am Saturday October 24, 2009

I was reading Gothamist this morning and saw what was, simultaneously, the saddest and most hilarious little ‘human’ interest piece posted last night: a rat got stuck in a crack in a New York City sidewalk and a reader snapped a photo. (I’d post the pic here but I don’t have the rights – you’ll have to go check it out on their site.) Suffice it to say the animal was trapped with its top half poking out of a crack in the pavement in what was both a horrifying and strangely… cute fashion. Anyhoo… what interested me was this:


1) readers sent in Photoshopped versions of the rat with ridiculous humorous things for it to do while it was trapped (playing Solitaire, etc.)

2) the comments were FILLED with heated back and forth about what was the moral thing to do in this situation. Kill the rat or pull out all the stops to save it? Call the fire department, get a crow bar, spray on the WD-40, grease it down with Vaseline… or… put a bag over its head and stomp it?
Opinions were about evenly mixed. Some wanted to kill the rat for compassionate reasons. Others because it was a pest, and, hey, how often do you get one of NYC’s billions of rats to stand still long enough to bump it off? Still others joked about lawnmowers and golf clubs… and worse. Those who wanted to help it felt sad watching it struggle, or liked rats, or simply didn’t want to be the sorts of people who passed a fellow living creature in pain and did nothing to help. Some even went as far as to beg the Gothamist editors to find out where the sidewalk in question was, so they could go down there themselves and try to help.
I was amazed how passionate people got. And it got me thinking about how morally complicated we humans can be. In war, a man may be our enemy, yet still our brother  - we shoot him one moment, then patch him up the next. Are we hypocrites, or simply dealing with competing human instincts for compassion and defense? Animals do it too – I just saw something yesterday about animal mothers taking in babes of other species – even a leopard nursing the offspring of the babbon she had just killed.
So here we see people laughing, callous, and mean… and people over-the-top empathetic. What are we humans? Just an illogical bunch of conflicting impulses we try to cram into some cohesive ethical code?
I think so. 
Personally, I’m not a huge fan of rats, but I don’t fear and loathe them the way I do cockroaches and water bugs. It’s an atavistic thing. What would I have done? Faced with the moral conflict of aversion to rats, knowing they are pests and wanting less of them in NYC in a general sense, but not wanting to be their personal executioner, feeling compassion for this singular rat’s painful struggle… I think I’d have done one of two things. Walk on by, or call 311. Freeing a rat to go about its merry way making MORE pests for NYC to deal with doesn’t seem right. Killing it myself is more than I want to take on. Walking away seems a fair option, since it isn’t, strictly speaking, my problem or my societal duty (I am not a rat catcher by trade). But if I wanted to be diligent, I could CALL the rat catcher and alert him to do his thing. Thus, the 311 call.



Subscribe to receive updates from Everyday Ethics or follow us on Twitter!




Previous Posts

Coding Ethics...
Internet activist and New York Times bestselling author of The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You, Eli Pariser is concerned that information gatekeepers of the past (i.e. editors/reporters) have been replaced by algorithms that individually tailor information based upon a host of v

posted 2:49:15pm Jan. 22, 2012 | read full post »

Can Ethical Companies Do Business With Unethical Leaders?
Coca-cola has been accused of "propping up a notorious Swaziland dictator" whose human rights abuses and bilking of the national wealth has long been criticized by human rights activists. According to Guardian UK reporter David Smith**, Swaziland's King Mswati III is Africa's last absolute monarch w

posted 3:49:39pm Jan. 02, 2012 | read full post »

New Years Resolutions: Are We Lying to Ourselves?
I know it's become popular, but I've become suspect of using traditional goal-setting strategies and business process techniques to change personal habits and pursue a meaningful life. While I can admit that there's something invigorating--even exciting--about casting a new vision, writing that list

posted 10:51:42pm Jan. 01, 2012 | read full post »

Is Craigslist Who We Really Are?
Raise your hand if you're familiar with Craigslist.org.  Chances are, there's one that serves your community.  And it's extremely handy for job listings, housing, dating, selling your old crap or buying new old crap.Really, it's ingenious. But why's it also so darn discouraging?  

posted 9:15:55am Dec. 18, 2009 | read full post »

How Do You Complain - Gracefully?
So, I'm of the ethos that if you don't like your meal, you send it back. It's how I was raised, and I don't have any sense of shame about that. When you pay for something, you should get your money's worth. HOWEVER, I also believe there's a polite way to do it, and a wrong way.Sometimes I don't

posted 1:29:56pm Dec. 17, 2009 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
John McGrath

posted October 24, 2009 at 10:40 am


In this episode we see the essence of moral empathy. When we perceive a living creature as an individual, not just a member of a class or category, we are able to see something of ourselves in that creature. But when we reduce a living being to a category of evil or undesirability we are capable of cruelty with little or no remorse. That is why tribalism, war, extreme politics, extreme religion, and other human institutions of alienation must strip away individuality and assign a stereotype or a category to others.



report abuse
 

Alan Chin

posted October 24, 2009 at 11:03 am


Hi Hillary! I think you may be disregarding one important factor in how people react in such a situation: What their past experiences and biases might be. These pre-judgments and memories can often determine how you will behave in a particular circumstance, because you remember what you did, or should have done, or wanted to do, before.
In my case, a childhood spent on the Lower East Side of Manhattan and Chinatown in the 1970s, when those neighborhoods were swarming with rats, make me less sympathetic. I remember my great-uncle’s building on Eldridge Street, where there was a serious rat problem around the garbage cans on the ground floor. I even hunted them with a pellet pistol once, and killed a rat. They were a threat to the health of that building’s residents, of that there was no doubt. So in this case I would have probably stomped the rat. But I wouldn’t have felt good about it. No guilt, to be sure, but no pleasure either. Necessary, and dirty.
And frankly, this is what the rat catcher would do. Rat catchers kill rats. So if you call 311, why not just do it yourself? You are already equally culpable, because you know the consequences of your call. You do not actually escape “more than I want to take on” if you call 311. That being the case, I accept that responsibility, and would do it myself. It is quicker, after all, if a humanitarian excuse is needed.
But to get back to my original point — I have memories of having done this before — so it is very easy for me, having already crossed that threshold in the past.



report abuse
 

emmabliss57

posted October 24, 2009 at 11:05 pm


Maybe Alan is right that past experiences dictate present reactions, but I don’t agree. I have had to kill a mouse or two in my life, and with good reason. But my first reaction was to save the rat, and I’d like to think I would have. He is a living creature, and while I may not value his life as much as my own or my fellow human beings, I do think that unless his suffering will inevitably, or unavoidably, lead to death, the he deserves a chance to life. He is afraid and possibly in pain, and while that fear and suffering may not be the same we humans understand it, that does not make it any less real or any less important. Who am I to decide his death. If I can save him, I will.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.