Advertisement
Might there not be an ethical question in deciding whether you can judge someone as creepy without knowing the facts as you admittedly do not? --gmo2
It's a good rule of thumb: don't judge too hastily. And on this blog, I generally like to pose open-ended questions when the moral and ethical dilemmas we discuss don't have easy answers, or when all the facts aren't in. However, in Letterman's case...
Today, Everyday Ethics had
its first major plug... if you can call it that. USA TODAY gave us a mention in their Religion blog,
but it wasn't exactly pretty.
"This is ethics as popcorn, tasty and quickly forgotten." Or maybe that I'm just jealous. It reads like the gals are having fun. Their columns not freighted with anything heavy like, oh, legal, philosophical, theological basis for their positions. Randy Cohen, New York Times Ethicist, your turf is safe."
Ouch!
Well, yes, we are having
fun. And no, we're not Randy Cohen, though we admire him a great deal. We've
covered the fluff (lying on your online dating profile, an open letter to those
with bad laundry room etiquette) and the serious (health care reform and the
Lockerbie bomber). Our concerns are like yours, we hope--a little bit of the
petty, a little bit of the profound.
What we're most about is a 'woman-on-the-streets' perspective. We claim no higher knowledge, no years of
study in the legal profession or as theology students. We're a former
philosophy/classics major and a journalism major, who now make our living(s) in
the real world. What qualifies us to talk about the issues we bring up is what
qualifies you to read them: a keen concern, a caring heart, and a desire for
fair play.
So, to echo our friend at USA TODAY, we ask you, what do you consider "everyday" ethics?