Everyday Ethics

Recently in Media Ethics Category

Monday November 2, 2009

Things Don't Add Up in Wal-Mart Scuffle

Wal-Mart seems to be playing a much larger part in our blog than usual lately, but apparently that's where all the news happens. 

Actually, the incident I'm referring to in this case actually occurred three years ago, but the trial is approaching soon, and CNN recently hosted a small panel interview with John King to discuss whether or not this was a case of racism. 

Here's the backstory: Heather Ellis, a Wal-Mart shopper, became involved in a verbal tussle with a cashier -- she claims the cashier asked her for id even though she was paying cash and refused to hand over her change. The cashier claims she cut in line (wow, I've wanted to call the police on line-cutters, but this is ridiculous). From any account, it sounds as though things went from bad to worse quickly. The cashier called for the police, tempers rise, the situation turns into he says, she says. 

Tuesday October 20, 2009

Kelly Clarkson's Photoshopped Image Explained by Self Editor-- Poorly

If you're a reader of Self, you may or may not have heard the outraged cries echoing in the blogosphere when the magazine published its September cover featuring an extremely fit Kelly Clarkson - or more accurately, a falsely-fit Clarkson. 

Jezebel was one of many websites that compared the real Kelly with the fake Kelly; the real Kelly has the average woman's butt, the fake Kelly has a firm, perky behind that was finessed in Photoshop. Jezebel also rightly points out that the magazine editors didn't stop (or begin) with photoshopping Clarkson's image--they also did whatever they could to camouflage her pounds during the photoshoot. That is perhaps less a travesty in journalism ethics, yet it still shows the editors' willful disregard of the truth. 

The topic came up again last week at the Women at NBCU breakfast. Dr. Nancy Snyderman, the moderator and the chief medical expert at NBC News, asked Lucy Danziger, the editor-in-chief of Self, to explain herself. 

There were so many eye-roll inducing, jaw-dropping rationalizations crammed into this 3-minute AdAge clip, I barely know where to begin. I'd like to assume some bit of conscience on Danziger's part; even better, I'd like to think she went back to work and pounded her head on her desk recalling some of the asinine statements that came tumbling out of her mouth. 

Let's start with the "chicken and the egg" scenario which Danziger uses to excuse her culpability - she blames the consumer demand for fit-looking women for exacerbating society's image issues. Basically, if we didn't want it, they wouldn't put it out there. I understand that to a certain degree; however, that's not an acceptable excuse for substandard journalism. As long as Self wants to proclaim itself under the banner of journalism rather than a catalog of products then they have a responsibility to their readers. That responsibility is to put factual information (as they know it) out into the world. 

Regardless of "who started it", we all (or most of us) know that body image, eating disorders and obesity are serious problems in this country. The job of magazines such as Self is to help get that information out there, not to add to the problem by falsifying the image of a someone who could actually be an inspiration to the everyday woman. 

It's their ethical duty to stop the chicken and egg - well, at least stop what is in their control. 

Self\<\/i\> Editor-- Poorly' />

Monday September 28, 2009

Save The Boobs: PSA Or TMI?

breast_cancer_tattoos.jpgI'm on the fence about in-your-face public service announcements, as my prior post on sugary soda indicates. But this one, called "Save the Boobs", which you can watch on ABC News, really takes shock ads to a new level. Jiggling breasts, referred to as 'tatas', 'cheechees' and etc. and women in skimpy bikinis make this look more like a beer commercial than the breast cancer awareness spot it actually is.

So I'd like to ask - do you find this campaign a good way to bring awareness to young women about the dangers of breast cancer? After my earlier post in which I took a stand against shock ads, saying I thought they treated us like children instead of adults, some of the commenters had me thinking twice, and I am now leaning toward saying anything that has people tuning in is a good thing. However...

Friday September 25, 2009

Friday Failure: Journalists Who Won't Vote

Most of us have a love/hate relationship with the media...sometimes we love it, sometimes we hate it (and sometimes I love to hate how I'm a part of it). Still, one of the fundamentals of most democratic societies are the voices that speak to us under the banner of the free press, and I'd maintain that the majority of us have some basic faith in the institution.
 
At least I do (have a bit of faith), so I was disappointed when I found out a friendly acquaintance of mine didn't vote. Refused to vote. Now, that's bad enough -- what pushed me over the edge was the fact that she is a political reporter! She wasn't only failing in her duty as a citizen (in my opinion), she was falling down on her job.
 
However, she defended her decision not to vote, saying that this was the only way for her to maintain her credibility and write from an unbiased viewpoint. 
 
No offense to her ( and I might lose a friendly acquaintance if she's reading this), but I call B.S. on that defense.
 
Objective reporting is at the core of journalism, and responsible journalists will go to their grave writing in this manner in order to protect their Holy Grail of credibility. But objectivity does not come from removing yourself from the daily lives of the masses, it comes with a certain determination and mindset. Being a journalist does not mean you get a free pass from life.

I would argue that every journalist must learn and perfect the art of objectivity, despite their personal beliefs and ideals. Sure, these days it's a skill often found lacking in mainstream media outlets -- depending on your political views, you can look to CNN or Fox News as an example.  Still, objectivity is something to strive for as a professional journalist , regardless of your life as a private citizen.

 
What do you think? Should journalists be excused from such activities as voting in order to maintain their credibility? Or is that just an easy (and lazy) excuse?

Friday September 18, 2009

Innocent Until Proven Guilty -- Is This Still the Case?

I was reading a CNN article about the 4 young men falsely accused of rape at Hofstra University; unsurprisingly, they described the experience as 'traumatic'. Well, yes, to say the least!

Please don't get me wrong, I'm not speaking out against rape victims who speak up -- all too often, their voices are heard with disbelief and scorn. I merely want to make a comment on the whole concept of "innocent until proven guilty" in America.

As the lines of communication become more and more ubiquitous, it seems that this long-held credo of the American justice system has been thrown out the window. To even be linked to a crime, especially such horrendous crimes as rape and murder, is traumatizing (a weak word, in my opinion). Unfortunately, it's made all the worse by the media and the public who listens, with ears cocked for the salacious details and their mouths ready to condemn.

Take for example the sad story of Annie Le. Almost as soon as Raymond Clark was arrested and charged with Le's murder, news stories were popping up all over the internet and television with headlines plastering his mugshot and blathering on about how he was always 'quiet' and 'loved his dog'.

I was, however, pleasantly surprised to see that Yale University President Richard Levin was quoted as saying, "we must resist the temptation to rush to judgment." Thank you, sir!

Again, I'm not speaking out against the victims of these atrocities -- merely asking for a bit of restraint before we sharpen our pitchforks.

Tuesday September 15, 2009

If Obama Calls Kanye A Jackass Off The Record, Does It Make A Sound?

It does if Terry Moran (Moron?) tweets it.So, the civility debate rages (ironically) on. And as everyone's buzzing, the president's now caught up in it, having remarked off the record in a CNBC interview that he thought Kanye West was...

Tuesday September 1, 2009

Do We Need To Be Shocked (Or Grossed) Out Of Our Sugar Habit?

Public health announcements: they make me vastly uneasy. And none more so than the new NYC anti-soda campaign, which actually just makes me vastly queasy:Do we really need some in-your-face ad agency terrifying us with PSAs à la the text-messaging teenagers car crash video that...

Thursday August 27, 2009

What Do You Consider "Everyday Ethics"?

Today, Everyday Ethics had its first major plug... if you can call it that. USA TODAY gave us a mention in their Religion blog, but it wasn't exactly pretty. "This is ethics as popcorn, tasty and quickly forgotten." Or...

Thursday August 20, 2009

Can Liars Become Leaders? Disgraced Reporter Jayson Blair Is Now... A Life Coach?!?

The AP is reporting disgraced ex-reporter Jayson Blair - famous for plagiarizing (and in some cases, completely fabricating) the news while a New York Times reporter back in 2003 - has a new career these days: Life Coach. Blair, who...

Friday August 7, 2009

New Feature! Failure Friday: We Take a Look at Our Weekly Ethical Fails

They say confession is good for the soul. We're going to find out, starting today, our first Failure Friday!Last Monday, Hillary debuted our new feature, "Moral Mondays", honoring those who put their words into action and act in an outstanding...

Monday July 13, 2009

Journalistic Narcissism: Unethical or Merely Inevitable?

Nar-cis-sism  [nahr-suh-siz-em]  -noun1. inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity.2. Psychoanalysis. erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development. Is it unethical for the news to become...

Sunday June 7, 2009

Thai Rath Publishes Carradine Hanging Photo, Sparks Outrage

I haven't blogged about the David Carradine story up 'til now, because, well, I thought it was somewhat unethical to dredge the actor's death into the public spotlight more than it already was (if that were possible). I'm of the...

Advertisement

Search This Blog

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Everyday Ethics

About Everyday Ethics

This blog is all about ethics. It's also about us--ordinary people facing ordinary situations. It's about asking ourselves the hard questions: What responsibility do we bear in our interactions (and yes, confrontations) with the people we meet? How do we best respond to those around us in a way that leaves us feeling good about ourselves and confident our behavior has done no harm? Have we helped or hurt our fellows in these moments? It's our belief that by asking some big questions (and some little ones too) we can grow as humans. We're glad you're along for the ride!

About the Authors

Hillary Fields
Hillary Fields is a New York-based writer, editor and web producer.
» Posts by Hillary Fields
Padmini Mangunta
Padmini Mangunta is a writer and editor with a Journalism degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia.
» Posts by Padmini Mangunta
More »

Ethics and Family

Islam
Beliefnet's Family Values Toolkit offers age-specific resources to help kids navigate difficult decisions.
View the Toolkit

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.