God-O-Meter

God-O-Meter

Would Romney as Veep Further Alienate Evangelicals?

posted by dgilgoff | 2:26pm Wednesday July 30, 2008

romneyhuckabee.jpgEvangelicals were famously divided ruing this year’s Republican primaries–the New York Times dubbed it an “evangelical crackup–but the most viscous divisions were between those supporting Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. Huck’s evangelical forces saw Romney as the ultimately opportunist, converting to the social conservative cause only when he perceived that doing so would help cut a path to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Romney’s evangelical backers–there were a good number of them, particularly in elite circles–thought Huckabee was playing to the basest tendencies of the evangelical movement, campaigning to be a “pastor-in-chief” and cynically playing the Mormon card. (Remember Huck’s devil remark?)
With both men reportedly in the running to be John McCain’s vice presidential pick, the divisions between evangelicals for Huck and evangelicals for Mitt have resurfaced. A prominent evangelical Huckabee emailed GOM today with this Townhall post about persistent evangelical suspicions of Romney, with the title line “Huck Forces still attacking Mitt.”
Romney’s defenders–who, again, tend to the populate the elite conservative ranks–dismiss reports of evangelical antipathy toward Romney as the dirty work of Huck’s henchmen. Townhall is a good example. AllahPundit, meanwhile, takes the evangelical opposition to Romney to be more genuine.
Such sentiment makes the ecumenical God-o-Meter wince, but it nonetheless appears to be real. A Pew poll released last December reported as much:

Furthermore, the group of Americans most likely to say they value religiosity in a president – white evangelical Protestants – is also the group most apt to be bothered by [Romney's] religion. More than one-in-three evangelical Republicans (36%) expressed reservations about voting for a Mormon, a level of opposition much higher than that seen among the electorate overall.

McCain’s advisors have to be taking this into consideration. But if they’re counting more on independents than evangelicals anyway, Romney–the old, socially liberal Romney–doesn’t look like such a liability.


4



Previous Posts

Closed for the Season
With Election Day finally having come and gone, God-o-Meter is closing up shop till 2012--or at least 2010. Till then, get your faith and politics fix over at Beliefnet editor-in-chief Steve Waldman's blog. 7

posted 4:32:33pm Nov. 19, 2008 | read full post »

On The Religious Left, Great Expectations
The first priorities for Barack Obama's administration will be the economy and a variety of foreign policy issues. But the burgeoning religious left, which worked so hard to get Obama elected, expects some movement on its issues, including a robust White House office of faith-based initiatives, pove

posted 1:49:31pm Nov. 07, 2008 | read full post »

Howard Dean's Vindication
God-o-Meter wrote a piece for today's Roll Call on the vindication of Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean's much-derided 50-State Strategy, which is largely about reaching out to the nation's more religious voters in the red states: Years before Barack Obama showed that a liberal Demo

posted 2:01:06pm Nov. 06, 2008 | read full post »

A Post-Election Chat with Ralph Reed
Amid today's talk that Barack Obama has narrowed the God Gap, God-o-Meter checked in with Ralph Reed, who spearheaded religious outreach for George W. Bush's 2000 and 2004 campaigns and who pioneered such outreach for Republicans as executive director of the Christian Coalition. What surprised you i

posted 3:09:07pm Nov. 05, 2008 | read full post »

More Innacurate Faith Storylines From the Media
God-o-Meter is struck by the number of faith-based storylines the news media appear to have gotten dead wrong this year. One was the line that Obama was poised to make big gains among white votes, especially evangelicals, who were undergoing a generational shift in their political thinking and reexa

posted 11:53:20am Nov. 05, 2008 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
MDC

posted July 30, 2008 at 3:52 pm


We can only hope so. I truly believe that the Evangelicals Right-Wing shares a great bit of responsibility in the downfall of our perception in the international community and the fact that they fell into the hands of Bush’s administration and allowed themselves to be used by the neo-cons is all the proof you need. Keep religion out of politics, period. We are living through proof that separation of church and state has its place for a reason.



report abuse
 

Paul, seeking wisdom.

posted July 30, 2008 at 3:56 pm


Considering that Obama will most likely have a Roman Catholic running mate, IF McClain choses Mitt Romney as his partner the Religeous
Right will probably not vote at all. They think that Catholics are “whores” and the LDS is Heathen.
What choice do they have? T. Boone Pickens?



report abuse
 

mike

posted August 1, 2008 at 11:49 am


I agree with all of the above. A small minority of Evangelicals need to stop mixing politics and religion. They are hurting the good of the Republican party and they are starting to make fools of themselves via their blatant irrational religious intolerance. Mitt Romney is not a Heathen. He is a fine outstanding Christian by most American’s definition.



report abuse
 

Bo

posted August 1, 2008 at 11:03 pm


If Republicans want to win the presidential election- Mitt Romney has more to offer then Huckabee as a VP. If republicans want to hand Obama the presidency-so be it. Evangelicals need to put our country 1st.



report abuse
 

sandie shuck

posted August 2, 2008 at 9:56 am


No-most evangelicals will not be offended by Romney-the biggest character issue is the character of the President-the biggest issue with Evangelicals is abortion. As an evangelical, I cannot bear the idea of abortion-and especially partial birth.
There are many of us out there who would accept Romney with open arms.
I work in education in an at-risk high school and often sit by the side of young girls, 15-17, who have abortion after abortion. I do not want the government to spend one nickle of my tax money on promoting any type of abortion. Often, I sit by the side of a young teenager or run into one of these out of the classroom and, after the abortion, wonder why they choose to have one? I feel so sorry for them as many teens regret what they have done at a later date. You have to be a woman to undestand.
In the 20 years I have been in education, I have never had a young lady run up to me and say that they were glad they had an abortion. Often these girls have one without really thinking or feel they are in a position where they do not necessarily want to have an abortion but, at the moment, it is the best thing to do. Often, 6 months later, they are pregnant again.
I am very anti-Planned parenthood. No bag of goodies that young girls get from Planned Parenthood is going to stop young girls from haveing unprotected sex. If it was, we would not have so many young girls having abortions or having babies. I also am not in favor of putting young girls on birth control. There are often medical complications young 15-16 year olds have from taking birth control.
Teens in high school should be focusing their attention getting an education and learning how to date and build social relations with the opposite sex-not having sex!
Dr. Martin Luther King’s neice calls abortion ‘womb lynching’-There have been 53 million abortions since the ’70′.
So, as McCain is pro-life, in my opinion, it would be fine. Romney would bring a great background in economics and my second issue is who can get me more energy, oil or alternative, now. So Romney would get much support due to this.
God Bless



report abuse
 

Sue

posted August 3, 2008 at 6:57 pm


PLEASE have someone with an understanding of spelling and grammar proof read these articles! The mistakes are so numerous and distracting I can barely focus on the content!



report abuse
 

American-Woman

posted August 4, 2008 at 10:32 am


regarding Sue……….. about grammar….too bad not all of us have talents in grammar. your post shows you are letting the errors get in way of the message.
As for Romney if McCain chooses him, I think he would be an outstanding man for the job.
Huckabee is a jealous man and it shows. We do not need a preacher as a VP.
From what I have seen of Romney he speaks well and tries to see what the people are needing and asking.



report abuse
 

CHINI

posted August 5, 2008 at 5:01 pm


You cant get a more decent individual than Mitt ROmney (who doesnt wear his religion on his sleeve.) He is a highly moral and ethical person. He is pro-life and against gay marriage, contrary to the positions of Barack Hussein, who is even pro third-term abortion rights. Evangelicals better wake up to the fact that if they stay home and not vote for McCain (if ROmney is on the VP ticket), then they are biting off their noses to spite their faces. Obama’s positions on social issues are everything they stand against.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.